Need for Dominance Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes, true
- No, not true
- Yes, true
- No, not true
- Yes, true
- No, not true
Need for Dominance Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand how they take charge, influence decisions, or respond when others resist them may find the Need for Dominance Scale Test useful. The result is a dominance assessment of recurring social patterns, focusing on leadership preferences, assertiveness, and conflict behavior. It is descriptive, helping a respondent reflect on these patterns without reducing personality to one number.
What This Assessment Explores
Dominance here means seeking influence, directing group activity, and persisting during disagreement-not simply being loud or confident.
The items present initiative, public participation, blunt criticism, decision-making, embarrassment, reserve, stubbornness, and conflict as situations in which the tendency may appear. They show one drive across settings, not three separate traits.
One overall result makes this an assessment of leadership dominance, rather than three trait scores:
- Influence and persuasion show how readily you shape others’ opinions or choices.
- Organizing activities and decision-making roles show how the drive may direct groups.
- Criticism, stubbornness, and standing up for yourself show influence-seeking in conflict.
The displayed scale is Need for Dominance (0-20), with Low (0-6), Moderate (7-13), and High (14-20) bands. Higher placement indicates a stronger drive to direct, influence, organize, win disputes, shape opinions, and prefer compliant peers.
Methodology and Evidence Base
The response format is brief binary self-report. Most statements ask the respondent to choose Yes, true or No, not true; one item uses Yes or No. The questions move across preferences, interpersonal behavior, emotional reactions, and self-perception, so the score reflects a pattern across situations rather than one isolated answer.
The V4 online version is attributed to David M. Buss and Jerry M. Burger. A related published measure is Orlov’s Need for Dominance Questionnaire, whose need-motivational approach addresses the drive toward influence, while Medcof’s 1990 study examined the corresponding scale in the Manifest Needs Questionnaire. These sources offer comparison for the construct and related reliability evidence, but they do not establish psychometric properties for this online form.
Scoring produces the displayed total, yet item weights, reverse-keyed items, scoring conversion, and norms are not supplied for this version, so none should be inferred from the score range. Findings from a related published scale do not establish independent norms or clinical validation for this online form. Because answers depend on current context, self-awareness, and candor, its bands are descriptive rather than diagnostic.
- Orlov, Yu. M. (1976). The Need for Dominance in Educational Activity. In Yu. M. Orlov (Ed.), Needs and Motives of Educational Activity among Medical University Students (pp. 64-80). Moscow: First Moscow Medical Institute Press.
- Medcof, J. W. (1990). The Need for Dominance Scale of the Manifest Needs Questionnaire: Its Reliability and Validity. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 39(3), 307-322. 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1990.tb01056.x
- Orlov, Yu. M. (1984). Need-Motivational Factors in the Effectiveness of Educational Activity of University Students: Doctoral Dissertation in Psychology. Moscow.
- Orlov, Yu. M., & Babin, B. A. (1978). Forecasting the Social Needs of Youth. Moscow: Nauka.
Updated: