Partner Role Expectations Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Completely agree
- Generally true
- Not quite true
- Not true
- Completely agree
- Generally true
- This is not entirely true
- This is not true
- Completely agree
- Generally true
- Not really true
- Not true
Partner Role Expectations Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
People considering marriage, discussing household responsibilities, or reflecting on an established relationship can use the Partner Role Expectations Questionnaire Test to examine assumptions about partnership. It is especially useful when two people want language for comparing priorities rather than judging whose model is correct. The profile shows which family roles, relationship functions, and personal values receive greater or lesser emphasis. It can support a focused conversation about marital role expectations.
What This Assessment Explores
The questions address practical duties, emotional exchange, intimacy, appearance, work, and spousal identification. A family role questionnaire does not reduce compatibility to one trait; it separates areas in which respondents may claim responsibility, expect a partner’s contribution, or assign importance to marriage.
The profile combines these result dimensions:
- Parental Responsibilities (0-9) shows the value placed on parenthood and childrearing.
- Household and Domestic Functions (0-9) reflects home management, domestic skills, and shared tasks.
- Importance of Physical Appearance (0-9) captures emphasis on attractiveness and current presentation.
- Emotional and Psychotherapeutic Function (0-9) concerns listening, moral support, and emotional leadership.
- External Social Activity (0-9) reflects professional, public, and social engagement.
- Personal Identification (0-9) shows whether shared interests and values outweigh autonomy.
- Sexual Relations (0-9) indicates the perceived importance of sexual harmony.
The catalogue presents lower or low, moderate, and high bands for most dimensions; Personal Identification uses Autonomy-oriented, Balanced identification, and Strong identification.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Most items use four ordered choices, from complete agreement or a generally true statement to rejection. They address beliefs, preferences, abilities, and expectations in family situations. Responses form separate domain scores, allowing personal role aspirations to be read alongside expectations of a partner.
Scores are displayed from 0 to 9 for each dimension. The display does not specify item weights, reverse-scoring instructions, or points assigned to each response, so those details cannot be inferred from the ranges. As a marriage role questionnaire, it presents patterned priorities rather than a compatibility verdict.
Its thematic structure is conceptually consistent with Role Expectations and Claims in Marriage (Volkova, 1979). Volkova and Trapeznikova (1985) provide methodological context for marital assessment, while Sazonova (2018) connects family values with role settings in married couples. These sources clarify the constructs but do not establish this online version as a standardized adaptation of one published instrument.
Without supplied norms, reliability coefficients, or diagnostic cutoffs, results are best read as a self-report of current beliefs and priorities. Relationship experience, culture, social expectations, and self-awareness may shape responses.
- Volkova, A. N. (1979). Socio-Psychological Factors of Marital Compatibility: Dissertation for the Degree of Candidate of Psychological Sciences. Leningrad, 181 pp.
- Volkova, A. N., & Trapeznikova, T. M. (1985). Methodological Techniques for Diagnosing Marital Relationships. Questions of Psychology, 5, 110-116.
- Sazonova, O. V. (2018). Family Values and Role Settings of Married Couples. Problems of Modern Psychology, 39, 272-295. 10.32626/2227-6246.2018-39.272-295
Updated: