Home1
Psychological tests2
Irrational Beliefs Diagnostic Method (SPB)3

Irrational Beliefs Diagnostic Method (SPB) Test

In 10 minutes, understand the irrational beliefs behind stress, anxiety, and low mood. Get clear, actionable insights to guide therapy, coaching, or personal change fast.

Start Online Test

Questions: 5010 minutes

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

18,563 views

1,923 completions

1,531 likes

Verified by Daniel Hall

Psychologist with 25 years of experience

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

31/60

Evaluative Attitude (EA)

Evaluative Attitude measures the tendency to judge oneself and others globally versus focusing on specific behaviors or traits.

Global judgments

Mixed style

Nuanced evaluation

10 – 29: Global judgments | 30 – 45: Mixed style | 46 – 60: Nuanced evaluation

A score of 31 falls in the Mixed style range, suggesting you sometimes make overall judgments but can also shift to more specific, nuanced evaluations depending on the situation.

example score

45/60

Frustration Tolerance (FT)

Frustration tolerance reflects how well a person can endure stress and setbacks without becoming overwhelmed.

Low

Moderate

High

10 – 29: Low | 30 – 45: Moderate | 46 – 60: High

A score of 45 indicates a moderate ability to tolerate frustration, suggesting generally adequate coping with obstacles that may still feel taxing under sustained stress.

example score

33/60

Demandingness Toward Others (DTO)

Measures how strongly a person feels others must meet high expectations versus allowing flexibility in what they demand from others.

Strong obligation

Balanced expectations

Flexible expectations

10 – 29: Strong obligation | 30 – 45: Balanced expectations | 46 – 60: Flexible expectations

A score of 33 falls in the Balanced expectations range, suggesting generally realistic demands on others with some tendency to expect certain standards in stressful situations.

example score

19/60

Self-Demandingness (SD)

Assesses how rigidly a person demands obligation and high standards from themselves versus holding a more balanced view of personal responsibilities.

Low

Moderate

High

10 – 29: Low | 30 – 45: Moderate | 46 – 60: High

A score of 19 falls in the Low range, suggesting stronger self-criticism and more unrealistic expectations toward oneself compared with a balanced sense of personal obligations.

example score

39/60

Catastrophizing (C)

Assesses the tendency to interpret difficulties as extreme, unbearable events versus responding to them in a more rational, proportionate way.

Pronounced catastrophizing

Moderate catastrophizing

Rational appraisal

10 – 29: Pronounced catastrophizing | 30 – 45: Moderate catastrophizing | 46 – 60: Rational appraisal

A score of 39 falls in the Moderate catastrophizing range, suggesting a mixed pattern where stressors may sometimes be viewed as more severe than they are, but not consistently.

example score

267/300

Rationality of Thinking (RoT)

Assesses the overall degree to which a person’s thinking is guided by rational attitudes versus irrational beliefs.

Low rationality

Moderate rationality

High rationality

50 – 149: Low rationality | 150 – 229: Moderate rationality | 230 – 300: High rationality

A score of 267 falls in the High rationality range, suggesting a predominance of rational attitudes and a relatively lower influence of persistent irrational beliefs.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Anxious self-reflectors

41%OF USERS

People dealing with anxiety, low mood, or stress who want to understand which thinking patterns are intensifying their emotions.

Therapy and coaching clients

34%OF USERS

People already in counseling, therapy, or coaching who need a clear starting point for what beliefs to work on first.

Psychology professionals

25%OF USERS

Therapists, psychologists, and trainers who use a quick questionnaire to identify irrational beliefs and plan targeted interventions.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.

Evaluative Attitude (EA)

Average

25.3

Normal range

18.4 — 32.1

min.

max.

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Frustration Tolerance (FT)

Average

30.5

Normal range

23.2 — 37.9

min.

max.

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Obligation Towards Others (OTO)

Average

30.8

Normal range

21.5 — 40.2

min.

max.

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Obligation Toward Oneself (OTO)

Average

34.4

Normal range

26.2 — 42.6

min.

max.

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Catastrophizing (C)

Average

46.5

Normal range

39.2 — 53.7

min.

max.

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Degree of Rational Thinking (DoRT)

Average

222.9

Normal range

188.9 — 256.9

min.

max.

300

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Start Online Test

Featured On

SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

People hold different beliefs. We are interested in your opinion regarding the statements below. Please select the response option that best reflects your level of agreement with each statement.

- Completely agree
- Mostly agree
- Slightly agree
- Slightly disagree
- Mostly disagree
- Completely disagree
- Completely agree
- Mostly agree
- Slightly agree
- Slightly disagree
- Mostly disagree
- Completely disagree
- Completely agree
- Mostly agree
- Slightly agree
- Slightly disagree
- Mostly disagree
- Completely disagree

These are 3 of the 50 real questions — the rest appear in the test. No sign-up needed to start.

Start Online Test

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Irrational Beliefs Diagnostic Method (SPB) Test - Symptoms and Signs

irrational beliefs

cognitive distortions

cbt

rational-emotional therapy

This self-report measure is designed to identify patterns of maladaptive, rigid belief structures that may contribute to emotional distress. The Irrational Beliefs Diagnostic Method (SPB) is commonly used to support case conceptualization by clarifying cognitive themes associated with negative affect and stress reactivity.

The instrument includes 50 items and typically requires about 10 minutes to complete. Item content focuses on identifying absolutistic or inflexible evaluations, cognitive distortions (e.g., catastrophizing and overgeneralization), and belief patterns that may be associated with anxiety and depressive symptoms. Results are generally interpreted as indicators of clinically relevant cognitive targets for further assessment and intervention planning rather than as a stand-alone diagnosis.

The Irrational Beliefs Diagnostic Method (SPB) is often considered within the framework of rational emotive behavior therapy concepts (Ellis). It may be used in clinical and applied settings to guide treatment focus, monitor belief change over time, and facilitate discussion of cognitive and emotional processes during therapy.

Author: Aaron T. Beck, Albert Ellis

Literature: Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer. 1984.; Demaria, T. P., Kassinove, H., & Dill, C. A. Psychometric properties of the Survey of Personal Beliefs: a rational-emotive measure of irrational thinking. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1989.