Occupational Anxiety Assessment Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Not at all like me
- Not like me
- Not sure
- Like me
- Very much like me
- Not at all like me
- Not like me
- Unsure
- Like me
- Very much like me
- Not at all like me
- Not like me
- Not sure
- Like me
- Very much like me
Occupational Anxiety Assessment Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to reflect on whether their current experience merits closer attention may find the Occupational Anxiety Assessment Test useful. An assessment of anxiety at work can organize personal observations before someone reviews working conditions, considers a change in routine, or decides what kind of support would be useful.
What This Assessment Explores
An occupational anxiety questionnaire separates anxiety across multiple life areas from anxiety related to work activity, then combines them in an overall index. It describes anxiety as a pattern and level. Themes include workload, interactions, fatigue, mood, irritability, and social connection; references to students, parents, colleagues, and school leaders make it relevant to educators, while other workers may reflect with it.
Three displayed scales are:
- General Anxiety (1-10) measures anxiety across multiple life areas beyond work; Low 1-3, Moderate 4-7, High 8-10.
- Occupational (1-10) measures anxiety related to work activity; Low 1-3 indicates no anxiety, Moderate 4-7 a normal level, and High 8-10 pronounced occupational anxiety.
- Overall Anxiety Level (1-10) combines both components; Low/None 1-2, Normal 3-6, Elevated 7-10, with higher scores potentially indicating risk to psychological well-being.
Typical levels support adaptation; elevated levels may indicate a generalized-anxiety tendency.
Methodology and Evidence Base
The questionnaire is a self-report anxiety assessment: each statement asks how closely it describes the respondent, using five response positions from ‘Not at all like me’ to ‘Very much like me,’ with middle options for uncertainty. The format captures perceived fit or frequency, not an objective count of anxious events.
The questionnaire displays three scores. Its item weighting and score transformation are not specified, so a response number cannot be converted into a known contribution; the result should not be recreated by simply adding response numbers.
The separation between general and occupational anxiety is conceptually consistent with Spielberger’s state-trait framework and the STAI, which distinguishes anxiety as a current condition from a more enduring tendency. In this questionnaire, that framework helps explain the distinction between the general-anxiety component and the occupational component.
Interpretation should account for current workload, mood, exhaustion, and self-awareness, because self-report answers can shift with context. The bands provide a descriptive profile; without stated population norms, they should not be treated as clinical thresholds or a diagnosis.
- Prihozhan, A. M. (2009). Psychology of Anxiety: Preschool and School Age (2nd ed.). Saint Petersburg: Piter. ISBN 978-5-469-01499-7.
- Prihozhan, A. M. (1998). Causes, Prevention and Coping with Anxiety. Psychological Science and Education, 3(2), Article 2, 11-17.
- Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R. E., Vagg, P. R., and Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Spielberger, C. D. (2010). State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. In I. B. Weiner and W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0943.
Updated: