Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
ocd

Moral Scrupulosity OCD Test

Moral Scrupulosity OCD Test: Do I Have Moral OCD? - FreudlyMoral Scrupulosity OCD Test based on religious OCD symptoms. Free screening with analysis. Not diagnostic – consult mental health professional.en
With 82 questions taking about 10 minutes, the moral scrupulosity ocd test explores recurring moral doubts, compulsive reassurance, distress, and disruption in daily life. Your result can clarify the pattern and intensity of these experiences, offering a structured starting point for self-reflection and more informed conversations about support.
Questions: 8210 minutes
Moral Scrupulosity OCD Test: sample question card
March 25, 2026March 25, 2026Material has been updatedMarch 25, 2026Material has been published
8,525 views
2,828 completions
704 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
704 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Compulsions & ReassuranceC&R
Assesses how often and how strongly you use compulsions or reassurance-seeking to reduce moral doubt and guilt.
example score16/20
16/20Highexample score
0 – 6Low
7 – 13Moderate
14 – 20High
A score of 16 falls in the High range, suggesting frequent or hard-to-resist compulsive checking, mental reviewing, confessing, or reassurance-seeking when you feel morally uncertain.
Distress & Life ImpactD&LI
Assesses how much moral scrupulosity-related guilt, anxiety, or shame disrupts daily functioning such as work, relationships, decisions, and time use.
example score15/20
15/20High impactexample score
0 – 6Low impact
7 – 13Moderate impact
14 – 20High impact
A score of 15 indicates high distress and life interference, suggesting moral concerns are frequently upsetting and meaningfully disrupting daily activities.
Moral Obsessions FrequencyMOF
Measures how often moral or ethical intrusive thoughts, doubts, and fears occur.
example score6/20
6/20Lowexample score
0 – 6Low
7 – 13Moderate
14 – 20High
A score of 6 falls in the Low range, suggesting moral-obsession thoughts are occurring infrequently or are generally not persistent.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Guilt and self-doubt spirals
41%OF USERS
People who get stuck replaying everyday choices, fearing they were unfair, dishonest, or harmful, and seek certainty that they are a good person.
Reassurance and confessing loop
34%OF USERS
People who repeatedly ask others if they did the right thing, over-explain or confess minor issues, and feel temporary relief that quickly returns.
Avoiding moral “mistakes”
25%OF USERS
People who steer clear of situations, decisions, or relationships because they worry they might do something wrong, offend someone, or cause harm.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Compulsions & ReassuranceC&R
You?
Average12
Typical rangeTypical9.1 – 14.8
Possible0 – 20
Distress & Life ImpactD&LI
You?
Average12.9
Typical rangeTypical9.2 – 16.7
Possible0 – 20
Moral Obsessions FrequencyMOF
You?
Average6.6
Typical rangeTypical4.1 – 9
Possible0 – 20
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Never
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Almost always
    • Never
    • Rarely
    • Frequently
    • Nearly constantly
    • Not at all
    • A little
    • A lot
    • Extremely
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Moral Scrupulosity OCD Test - Description and methodology of the test

ocd
guilt

For readers facing persistent moral doubt, guilt, or fear of being ethically harmful, the Moral Scrupulosity OCD Test offers a structured way to organize these experiences. It is designed for self-reflection by people who notice intrusive ethical concerns and repeated attempts to obtain certainty. For readers whose fears involve faith, sin, honesty, or personal values, its religious OCD test focus may feel especially relevant. The result highlights patterns that may deserve attention.

What This Assessment Measures

Items examine intrusive doubts about being bad, dishonest, selfish, harmful, or morally responsible, alongside responses used to settle them. They ask about reviewing interactions, checking intentions, confessing, reassurance, researching rules, avoidance, delayed choices, guilt, shame, sleep, and interference with daily tasks.

As a scrupulosity OCD test, it separates moral obsessions, certainty-seeking responses, and their effects. The displayed dimensions are:

  • Compulsions & Reassurance (0-20) shows reliance on reviewing, rumination, confessing, intention-checking, reassurance, or avoidance; Low 0-6, Moderate 7-13, High 14-20.
  • Distress & Life Impact (0-20) shows emotional distress and disruption in work, relationships, decisions, or time; Low impact 0-6, Moderate impact 7-13, High impact 14-20.
  • Moral Obsessions Frequency (0-20) shows how often intrusive moral doubts, fears, and self-questioning occur; Low 0-6, Moderate 7-13, High 14-20.

Together, the profile shows whether thoughts, coping responses, or daily consequences are most prominent.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each item offers four response choices, but anchors vary: some assess frequency, while others rate truth, distress, or disruption. The format therefore captures graded self-report rather than correct or incorrect moral answers.

Responses feed three displayed scores. Interpret each range alongside its catalogue definition; the range does not show how many points every answer contributes, so the profile should not be reduced to one invented total.

Its conceptual reference is Scrupulosity Obsessions and Compulsions Scale (Borgogna et al., 2024), which frames scrupulosity within OCD. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that instrument, not an adaptation of it. The Scrupulosity Inventory (Miller et al., 2024) and Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity (Olatunji et al., 2007) offer related evidence on obsessional doubt and compulsive responses.

As a moral scrupulosity questionnaire, it is an online self-reflection measure rather than a standardized clinical assessment. Those studies do not establish norms, reliability, validity, or diagnostic cutoffs for this version. Current anxiety, memory, self-awareness, and response pressure may also influence self-report, so results describe experiences reported at completion.

Literature:
  • Johnson, David A. L., Nicholas C. Borgogna, Paul B. Ingram, Craig Warlick, Samuel D. Spencer, Callie E. Mims, Kiana L. Bunnell, and Jared A. Nielsen. “The Scrupulosity Obsessions and Compulsions Scale: A Measurement of Scrupulosity Within an OCD Framework.” Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders 43 (2024): 100918. 10.1016/j.jocrd.2024.100918
  • Miller, Chris H., Dawson W. Hedges, Bruce Brown, Joseph Olsen, and Elijah C. Baughan. “Development of the Scrupulosity Inventory: A Factor Analysis and Construct Validity Study.” Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 83 (2024): 101926. 10.1016/j.jbtep.2023.101926
  • Olatunji, Bunmi O., Jonathan S. Abramowitz, Nathan L. Williams, Kevin M. Connolly, and Jeffrey M. Lohr. “Scrupulosity and Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms: Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Validity of the Penn Inventory of Scrupulosity.” Journal of Anxiety Disorders 21, no. 6 (2007): 771-787. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.12.002

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment