Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly

Am I Dangerous Quiz

Am I Dangerous Quiz - Free Murderous Obsessed Test - FreudlyTake a free am i dangerous quiz to explore whether you are dangerous and understand what it means. Quick, no sign-up needed. Start now!en
With 15 questions completed in about 10 minutes, the Am I Dangerous Quiz examines recent violent thoughts, escalating anger, threats, boundary violations, planning, and access to means. Your result can highlight patterns requiring attention, helping you reflect on current safety, create distance, and involve trusted support.
Questions: 1510 minutes
Am I Dangerous Quiz: situation and reply bubbles
July 22, 2026July 22, 2026Material has been updatedJuly 22, 2026Material has been published
8,490 views
740 completions
676 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
676 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Behavioral Escalation and Boundary ViolationsBEaBV
Measures recent behavioral escalation and boundary-violating actions such as monitoring, confrontation, intimidation, pursuit, threats, or use of force.
example score7/15
7/15Prompt support warrantedexample score
0No current endorsement
1 – 2Concern to review
3 – 15Prompt support warranted
A score of 7 falls in the 'Prompt support warranted' range, reflecting endorsement of recent escalation or boundary violations that may indicate elevated concern even if the total is only a rough summary.
Intent, Planning, and AccessIPaA
Assesses indications of intent, planning, preparation, and access to means related to harming someone.
example score6/15
6/15Prompt support warrantedexample score
0No current endorsement
1 – 2Concern to review
3 – 15Prompt support warranted
A score of 6 falls in the “Prompt support warranted” range, reflecting reported specificity in intent, planning, preparation, target focus, and/or access that may be more immediate and actionable than vague thoughts.
Violent Thoughts and UrgesVTaU
Assesses the presence and intensity of violent thoughts, fantasies, or urges over the recent period.
example score8/15
8/15Prompt support warrantedexample score
0No current endorsement
1 – 2Concern to review
3 – 15Prompt support warranted
A score of 8 falls in the “Prompt support warranted” range, suggesting stronger or more persistent violent thoughts or urges were endorsed on this scale.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Intrusive thoughts worriers
41%OF USERS
People with unwanted violent thoughts or images who fear what they might mean and want a reality check without being judged.
Anger and escalation checkers
34%OF USERS
People noticing rising anger, fixation on someone, or recent boundary-crossing behavior who want to gauge risk factors and what to do next.
Friends and family concerned
25%OF USERS
People worried about someone close to them and looking for a structured way to think through warning signs and safety steps.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Behavioral Escalation and Boundary ViolationsBEaBV
You?
Average8
Typical rangeTypical5.4 – 10.6
Possible0 – 15
Intent, Planning, and AccessIPaA
You?
Average10.8
Typical rangeTypical8.7 – 12.8
Possible0 – 15
Violent Thoughts and UrgesVTaU
You?
Average9.1
Typical rangeTypical6.6 – 11.7
Possible0 – 15
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • I have not identified anyone as a target.
    • A person has briefly come to mind, without sustained focus or intent.
    • I repeatedly focus on a specific person or imagine confronting them, but have not decided to harm them.
    • I have selected a person and intend to approach, trap, attack, or kill them.
    • I have not experienced a concerning anger or fixation pattern.
    • It has been present but limited, without becoming more intense or behaviorally disruptive.
    • It has become more frequent, consuming, confrontational, or difficult to interrupt.
    • It is escalating rapidly, and I or someone else fears I may act violently soon.
    • I have not directed hostile or threatening communication at anyone.
    • I sent or said something harsh, then stopped without threatening harm.
    • I repeatedly used intimidating language or implied that something bad might happen.
    • I made a direct threat to injure or kill someone, even if I later withdrew it.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Am I Dangerous Quiz - Description and methodology of the test

Current risk-related experiences matter more here than a permanent label. For someone wondering whether anger, fixation, or violent urges are becoming harder to control, the Am I Dangerous Quiz offers a practical snapshot. It helps answer the concern behind a how dangerous am i quiz: how dangerous current thoughts or behavior may be, and when distance, trusted support, or urgent protective action deserves priority.

What This Assessment Explores

As a self-report assessment, it addresses the concern raised by a how dangerous are you quiz, examining recent anger, fixation, threats, monitoring, boundary violations, force, preparation, timing, and access to means. It supports self-reflection about current experiences, while its three dimensions summarize recent endorsed experiences rather than a generalized dangerousness or safety rating.

It shows three dimensions:

  • Behavioral Escalation and Boundary Violations (0-15) shows intimidation, pursuit, force, injury, or loss of control. Bands: No current endorsement (0); Concern to review (1-2); Prompt support warranted (3-15).
  • Intent, Planning, and Access (0-15) shows target focus, preparation, timing, and accessible means. Bands: No current endorsement (0); Concern to review (1-2); Prompt support warranted (3-15).
  • Violent Thoughts and Urges (0-15) captures unwanted or welcome thoughts, fantasies, and urges that may be difficult to resist. Bands: No current endorsement (0); Concern to review (1-2); Prompt support warranted (3-15).

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each item offers four ordered choices from no current endorsement through increasing concern, loss of control, or urgency. The wording concerns recent situations, making the result a current snapshot.

Three scale scores appear in this am i dangerous test; individual answer allocation and weighting are unspecified. They do not establish whether I am dangerous. The bands are unvalidated reflective summaries, not clinical, legal, severity, or violence-prediction cutoffs. Any concerning response matters independently; a red-flag response can override the total.

Past Feelings and Acts of Violence Scale (PFAV) is the closest comparison for self-reported violence risk; the Violent Ideations Scale (VIS) covers violent thoughts and urges. Related 1999 targeted-violence work by Borum and 2002 stalking work by Kropp, Hart, and Lyon address focus, intent, planning, escalation, and pursuit. These works are conceptually consistent with this questionnaire, not evidence of adaptation or revalidation.

Self-report depends on honest recall, self-awareness, and context. Specific intent, preparation, accessible means, or imminent loss of control call for distance, trusted support; if harm may occur soon or a plan could be carried out, contact emergency services or a crisis line.

Literature:
  • Plutchik, R., & van Praag, H. M. (1990). A self-report measure of violence risk, II. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 31(5), 450-456. 10.1016/0010-440X(90)90031-M
  • Murray, A. L., Eisner, M., & Ribeaud, D. (2018). Development and validation of a brief measure of violent thoughts: The Violent Ideations Scale (VIS). Assessment, 25(7), 942-955. 10.1177/1073191116667213
  • Borum, R., Fein, R., Vossekuil, B., & Berglund, J. (1999). Threat assessment: Defining an approach for evaluating risk of targeted violence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 17(3), 323-337. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199907/09)17:3<323::AID-BSL349>3.0.CO;2-G
  • Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., & Lyon, D. R. (2002). Risk assessment of stalkers: Some problems and possible solutions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(5), 590-616. 10.1177/009385402236734

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment