Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
reflection

Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ) Test

Take the online Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Designed for parents, the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ) Test takes about three minutes and contains 16 questions. Your results highlight how you understand your child’s feelings, thoughts, and behaviour, including confidence, curiosity, and possible misunderstandings, offering a focused starting point for self-reflection in everyday parenting.
Questions: 163 minutes
Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire: situation and reply bubbles
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
20,999 views
2,309 completions
1,956 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,956 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Pre-MentalizingPM
Measures the degree to which a parent struggles to understand a child’s inner experiences and may misattribute negative or hostile intentions to the child.
example score3/7
3/7Moderateexample score
1 – 2Low
3 – 5Moderate
6 – 7High
A score of 3 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting occasional difficulty making sense of the child’s feelings and motives, with some risk of misreading intentions in challenging moments.
CertaintyC
Measures how certain a parent feels that their interpretations of the child’s inner thoughts and feelings are accurate while still allowing for some uncertainty.
example score5/7
5/7Moderate confidenceexample score
1 – 3Low confidence
4 – 5Moderate confidence
6 – 7High confidence
A score of 5 suggests moderate confidence, indicating you generally trust your reading of your child’s mental state while still leaving room for doubt and curiosity.
Interest and CuriosityIaC
Measures how genuinely a parent is interested in and curious about the thoughts and feelings that may underlie their child’s behavior.
example score4/7
4/7Moderate curiosityexample score
1 – 2Low curiosity
3 – 5Moderate curiosity
6 – 7High curiosity
A score of 4 suggests a moderate level of curiosity, with some active interest in the child’s inner experience while there may still be room to explore it more consistently.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Curious, growth-minded parents
41%OF USERS
Parents who want quick insight into how well they understand their child’s feelings and their own reactions to everyday situations.
Parents in a tough phase
34%OF USERS
Caregivers dealing with frequent tantrums, conflict, anxiety, or big transitions who want clues about what might be driving the child’s behavior.
Clinicians and researchers
25%OF USERS
Professionals who use a brief measure to screen parent–child emotional attunement and inform support or study outcomes.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
PrereflectionP
You?
Average3.4
Typical rangeTypical2.6 – 4.2
Possible1 – 7
ConfidenceC
You?
Average3.8
Typical rangeTypical2.7 – 4.9
Possible1 – 7
Interest and CuriosityIaC
You?
Average5.1
Typical rangeTypical4.2 – 6.1
Possible1 – 7
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ) Test - Description and methodology of the test

reflection
parental attitude

Parents who want to understand how they interpret a child’s inner experience can use this questionnaire as a focused self-reflection exercise. The Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ) Test considers how caregivers make sense of feelings, thoughts, intentions, and behaviour during interactions. Its purpose is to make interpretations easier to notice. The results provide a parental mentalization assessment of patterns that may shape responses when a child seems hard to read.

What This Assessment Explores

The assessment examines how parents interpret a child’s inner world. Items address curiosity, perspective-taking, certainty, confusion, and perceived motives during interactions. As a reflective parenting questionnaire, it focuses on interpreting behaviour rather than whether the child is difficult.

The reported dimensions are:

  • Pre-Mentalizing (1-7) measures difficulty understanding the child’s subjective inner world and a tendency to attribute inaccurate and hostile intentions to the child; Low 1-2, Moderate 3-5, High 6-7.
  • Certainty (1-7) measures confidence in reading the child’s mental state while allowing doubt; Low confidence 1-3, Moderate confidence 4-5, High confidence 6-7.
  • Interest and Curiosity (1-7) measures genuine interest in the mental states behind behaviour; Low curiosity 1-2, Moderate curiosity 3-5, High curiosity 6-7.

Together, the profile shows how curiosity, certainty, and attribution of inaccurate and hostile intentions to the child appear in the respondent’s parenting perspective.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each statement uses seven response points from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree. Items cover perspective-taking, interest in feelings, confidence in reading the child, and explanations of behaviour that may embarrass, control, or provoke the parent.

Responses are grouped into displayed dimensions and interpreted separately. A parental reflective functioning profile can show curiosity with certainty or confusion with hostile interpretations; it is a pattern across situations, not a parent-or-child label.

The published Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ) is a self-report measure of how parents think about mental states. This online self-report profile is conceptually consistent with the published PRFQ, not a standardized, normed, or validated edition.

Luyten et al. (2017) developed the PRFQ and reported preliminary validation evidence. Carlone et al. (2023) later reported reliability and validity in three samples with varying clinical risk. Steele et al. (2008) linked childhood and parenting representations in adoption, supporting the mentalization framework. These studies do not validate this online profile or establish norms or diagnostic cutoffs for it. Self-report answers can shift with stress, self-awareness, and impression management, so results are best used for reflection rather than diagnosis.

Author: Miriam Steele, Peter Fonagy
Literature:
  • Luyten P, Mayes LC, Nijssens L, Fonagy P. (2017). The parental reflective functioning questionnaire: Development and preliminary validation. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0176218. 10.1371/journal.pone.0176218
  • Carlone C, Milan S, DeCoste C, Borelli JL, McMahon TJ, Suchman NE. (2023). Self-report measure of parental reflective functioning: A study of reliability and validity across three samples of varying clinical risk. Infant Mental Health Journal, 44(2), 240-254. 10.1002/imhj.22046
  • Steele M, Kaniuk J, Hodges J, Asquith K, Hillman S, Steele H. (2008). Measuring mentalization across contexts: Links between representations of childhood and representations of parenting in an adoption sample. In: Jurist EL, Slade A, Bergner S, editors. Mind to Mind: Infant Research, Neuroscience, and Psychoanalysis. New York: Other Press; 2008. p. 115-138.

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment