Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
psychopathology

Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) Test

Take the online Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Designed for a quick snapshot of functioning, the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) Test contains 4 questions and takes about 1 minute. It helps you reflect on socially useful activities, relationships, self-care, and aggressive behavior, revealing lower or higher functional impairment and lower or higher aggression-related difficulty.
Questions: 41 minute
Personal and Social Performance: situation and reply bubbles
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
27,448 views
2,572 completions
2,062 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,062 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Socially Useful ActivitiesSUA
Assesses the degree of impairment in socially beneficial activity such as work, study, and fulfilling daily responsibilities.
example score4/6
4/6Moderate impairmentexample score
1 – 2Low impairment
3 – 4Moderate impairment
5 – 6High impairment
A score of 4 indicates moderate impairment, suggesting noticeable difficulties in maintaining socially useful activities while some functioning may still be present.
Social RelationshipsSR
Assesses the degree of impairment in maintaining social relationships with family, friends, and colleagues.
example score3/6
3/6Moderate impairmentexample score
1 – 2Low impairment
3 – 4Moderate impairment
5 – 6High impairment
A score of 3 indicates a moderate level of difficulty in establishing or maintaining social contacts.
Self-CareSC
Assesses impairment in the ability to carry out basic self-care tasks such as hygiene, feeding, and daily self-maintenance.
example score3/6
3/6Moderate difficultyexample score
1 – 2Low difficulty
3 – 4Moderate difficulty
5 – 6High difficulty
A score of 3 indicates moderate difficulty with self-care, suggesting some challenges with routine hygiene or daily self-maintenance while retaining partial independence.
Aggressive BehaviorAB
Measures the intensity of verbal and physical aggressive behavior and related difficulty controlling aggression.
example score5/6
5/6Highexample score
1 – 2Low
3 – 4Moderate
5 – 6High
A score of 5 falls in the High range, indicating frequent or intense aggressive behavior with marked difficulty regulating it.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Clinicians monitoring schizophrenia care
46%OF USERS
Psychiatrists and mental health clinicians use it to quickly rate everyday functioning and track changes to guide treatment decisions.
Researchers and trial coordinators
34%OF USERS
Clinical researchers use it as a brief outcome measure to compare personal and social functioning across time or study groups.
Community support case managers
20%OF USERS
Social workers and rehabilitation staff use it to pinpoint practical support needs in work, self-care, and social participation.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
a) socially beneficial activityasba
You?
Average2.4
Typical rangeTypical1.6 – 3.1
Possible1 – 6
b) social relationshipsbsr
You?
Average4.6
Typical rangeTypical3.7 – 5.4
Possible1 – 6
c) self-carecs
You?
Average3.7
Typical rangeTypical3 – 4.5
Possible1 – 6
d) aggressive behaviordab
You?
Average2.9
Typical rangeTypical2.2 – 3.7
Possible1 – 6
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

Rate the patient according to the level of functional impairment observed over the past 7 days. This scale assesses impairment in four primary domains of functioning. To determine the degree of difficulty, follow the specified operational rating criteria.
    • Absent
    • Mild: known only to very close people
    • Marked: difficulties are evident to anyone around the patient, but do not substantially and negatively affect the patient’s ability to perform functions in this domain, taking into account the patient’s sociocultural status, age, sex, and level of education
    • Severe: difficulties greatly interfere with functioning in this domain; however, the patient is still able to function without professional or social assistance, even if not always adequately and/or only episodically; with assistance, he/she can reach the previous level of functioning
    • Very severe: difficulties make functioning in this domain impossible without professional assistance, or lead to destructive behavior, but there is no danger to life
    • Extremely severe: impairments and difficulties are so severe that the patient’s life is in danger
    • Absent
    • Mild: known only to very close people
    • Manifest: difficulties are obvious to anyone in the patient’s environment, but do not have a substantial negative impact on the patient’s ability to carry out functions in this area, taking into account the patient’s sociocultural status, age, sex, and level of education
    • Marked: difficulties greatly interfere with functioning in this area; however, the patient is still able to function without professional or social assistance, although not always adequately and/or only intermittently; with help from others, he/she can reach the previous level of functioning
    • Severe: difficulties make it impossible to function in this area without professional assistance, or lead to destructive behavior, but there is no threat to life
    • Very severe: impairments and difficulties are so pronounced that the patient’s life is in danger
    • Absent
    • Mild: known only to very close people
    • Moderate: difficulties are obvious to anyone around the patient, but do not have a substantial negative impact on the patient’s ability to carry out functions in this area, taking into account the patient’s sociocultural status, age, sex, and educational level
    • Marked: difficulties greatly interfere with functioning in this area; nevertheless, the patient is still able to function without professional or social assistance, although not always adequately and/or intermittently; with assistance from others, he/she is able to achieve the previous level of functioning
    • Severe: difficulties make functioning in this area impossible without professional help, or lead to destructive behavior; however, there is no threat to life
    • Very severe: impairments and difficulties are so pronounced that the patient’s life is in danger
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) Test - Description and methodology of the test

psychopathology
schizophrenia

For readers who want to understand how psychological difficulties may affect responsibilities and relationships, the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) Test provides a structured way to interpret their practical effects in ordinary roles. A PSP assessment can show how reported difficulties shape participation and contact with others. Its profile helps connect psychological strain with everyday functioning without reducing the result to a single overall judgment.

What This Assessment Explores

The questionnaire examines difficulties affecting participation, relationships, basic care, and behavioral control. It suits anyone seeking structured reflection on everyday functioning. Results indicate where functional impairment is lower or higher and where aggression-related difficulty is lower or higher, according to the selected description.

The four result dimensions are:

  • Socially Useful Activities (1-6) indicates impairment in work, study, and daily responsibilities: Low impairment 1-2; Moderate impairment 3-4; High impairment 5-6.
  • Social Relationships (1-6) indicates difficulty maintaining contact with family, friends, and colleagues: Low impairment 1-2; Moderate impairment 3-4; High impairment 5-6.
  • Self-Care (1-6) indicates difficulty with hygiene, eating, and basic self-care: Low difficulty 1-2; Moderate difficulty 3-4; High difficulty 5-6.
  • Aggressive Behavior (1-6) indicates verbal or physical aggression severity and difficulty controlling it: Low 1-2; Moderate 3-4; High 5-6.

Together, the PSP scale shows where functioning is preserved and difficulties are disruptive.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each question presents one domain with six ordered options, from absent or mild difficulty through increasingly severe descriptions. Descriptions cover visibility, functional interference, need for assistance, and possible harm from aggression. Respondents choose the best-matching description rather than rate agreement.

For this PSP questionnaire, each description produces an ordered rating, and the displayed band gives its plain-language level. The four ratings are read separately; the format provides no basis for inventing a weighted total or overall score.

The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP), a published clinician-rated measure of social functioning. Morosini and colleagues established its four-domain structure; Nasrallah, Morosini, and Gagnon examined its reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change in people with stable schizophrenia. No norms or standardization are provided for this online self-report questionnaire; the cited reliability and validity findings apply to the published clinician-rated PSP instrument.

Interpretation depends on honest self-report and context, so stress, self-awareness, or fear of judgment may influence the selected option. Use the profile to identify patterns for reflection; it is a snapshot of reported functioning, not a diagnosis.

Author: Morosini, P.
Literature:
  • Morosini PL, Magliano L, Brambilla L, Ugolini S, Pioli R. Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social functioning. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2000;101(4):323-329. 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.101004323.x
  • Nasrallah H, Morosini PL, Gagnon DD. Reliability, validity and ability to detect change of the Personal and Social Performance scale in patients with stable schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research. 2008;161(2):213-224. 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.11.012

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment