Carl Jung Personality Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Carl Jung Personality Test - Description and methodology of the test
For readers considering a jung personality test, this questionnaire offers a way to examine recurring motivations, relationship attitudes, and preferred ways of engaging with life. Viewed as a Jung typology test, it suits people exploring feminine archetypal themes without reducing personality to one permanent label. The profile highlights which symbolic patterns appear more prominent in the respondent’s answers.
What This Assessment Explores
Seven profiles cover archetypal traits. A Jungian personality test shows prominence, not identity.
The scales measure:
- Aphrodite (0-9) measures creativity, openness, pleasure, and autonomy: Low 0-5; Moderate 6-6; High 7-9.
- Persephone (0-8) measures receptivity, imagination, empathy, listening: Low 0-3; Moderate 4-4; High 5-8.
- Demeter (0-8) measures caregiving, generosity, patience, support: Low 0-3; Moderate 4-4; High 5-8.
- Hera (0-8) measures loyalty, duty, partnership: Low 0-4; Moderate 5-5; High 6-8.
- Hestia (0-8) measures inner calm, solitude, spirituality: Low Hestia 0-3; Moderate Hestia 4-4; High Hestia 5-8.
- Athena (0-10) measures competence, rational thinking, strategy: Low 0-4; Moderate 5-5; High 6-10.
- Artemis (0-10) measures independence, confidence, achievement: Low 0-4; Moderate 5-5; High 6-10.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item requires a Yes/No choice about whether a statement fits the respondent. Answers are assigned to seven scales and shown in low, moderate, or high bands; the catalogue gives no universal diagnostic cutoff or item-by-item point rule.
The structure is conceptually consistent with Archetypal Patterns Method (Frolova, 2010), which organizes behavior through archetypal patterns. Its feminine symbolism parallels Jean Shinoda Bolen’s goddess psychology. The questionnaire can be read as a personality test associated with Carl Jung, while the study by de Albuquerque Paiva, Lima, and Giglio (2015) provides a related discussion of feminine archetypal images. These sources clarify the framework, but do not make the online questionnaire a direct adaptation of any one source.
Scores are comparative: a higher band means closer alignment with the tendency described by that scale, not a pure archetype. The displayed format is an online profile rather than a norm-referenced measure, and self-report results may shift with current circumstances, self-presentation, and self-awareness. Used as a Jung test, the profile offers one perspective for broader personal assessment.
- Frolova, Svetlana Vladimirovna. (2010). Method for Identifying Archetypal Patterns in the Behavior of Men and Women. In Consultative Psychology: Theory and Practice. Saratov: Saratov State University.
- Bolen, Jean Shinoda. (1984). Goddesses in Everywoman: A New Psychology of Women. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
- de Albuquerque Paiva, Suzana, Carmen Silvia Passos Lima, and Joel Sales Giglio. (2015). Individuation and the Feminine Soul: Study of Feminine Archetypal Images Carried out on Surgical Patients. Open Journal of Medical Psychology, 4, 99-110. 10.4236/ojmp.2015.44010
Updated: