Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Almost always or always
- Most of the time (more than half the time)
- Sometimes (about half the time)
- A few times (less than half the time)
- Almost never or never
- Very high
- High
- Moderate
- Low
- Very low
- No sexual activity
- Almost always or always
- Most times (more than half the time)
- Sometimes (about half the time)
- A few times (less than half the time)
- Almost never or never
- No sexual activity
Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People seeking a structured way to review recent sexual experiences can use the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) Test to organize concerns that may be difficult to describe. A female sexual function assessment can show how desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain fit together. The result offers a focused profile for self-reflection and identifying topics worth discussing more closely.
What This Assessment Explores
Sexual functioning is organized into related domains; FSFI score interpretation compares them.
The result reports these scales:
- Female Sexual Function Index Total Score (0–36) combines domains: Low functioning 0–14.4; Moderate functioning 14.5–21.6; Higher functioning 21.7–36.
- Desire (0–6) reflects sexual interest: Low desire 0–2; Moderate desire 3–4; High desire 5–6.
- Arousal (0–6) reflects arousal ability: Low arousal 0–2; Moderate arousal 3–4; High arousal 5–6.
- Lubrication (0–6) reflects physiological lubrication: Low lubrication 0–2; Moderate lubrication 3–4; Adequate lubrication 5–6.
- Orgasm (0–6) reflects orgasmic ability: More difficulty 0–2; Some difficulty 3–4; Few or no difficulties 5–6.
- Satisfaction (0–6) reflects sexual-life evaluation: Low satisfaction 0–2; Moderate satisfaction 3–4; High satisfaction 5–6.
- Pain (0–6) reflects pain during or after sexual activity: Minimal or no pain 0–2; Moderate pain 3–4; Marked pain 5–6.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Questions refer to the previous four weeks and use response styles covering frequency, intensity, difficulty, and satisfaction. Options such as “No sexual activity” and “No attempts at intercourse” distinguish non-occurrence from difficulty.
The female sexual function questionnaire turns these answers into domain results and a composite total. Because formats differ, interpretation should follow the displayed ranges rather than assume identical point values. A profile may reveal a specific difficulty even when the total is less pronounced.
The published FSFI instrument supplies the six-domain reference. Rosen and colleagues introduced that instrument; Meston’s 2003 validation study examined women with orgasmic disorder and hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Wiegel, Meston, and Rosen (2005) reported cross-validation and clinical cutoff work. This online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with those studies, not a documented adaptation of them.
These studies support the domain structure but do not standardize this online version for every population. Scores alone are not diagnostic: recall, current circumstances, self-awareness, and response bias can affect self-report, so persistent concerns need broader clinical context.
- Rosen, R., Brown, C., Heiman, J., Leiblum, S., Meston, C., Shabsigh, R., Ferguson, D., & D’Agostino, R., Jr. (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): A multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 26(2), 191–208. 10.1080/009262300278597
- Wiegel, M., Meston, C., & Rosen, R. (2005). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): Cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 31(1), 1–20. 10.1080/00926230590475206
- Meston, C. M. (2003). Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with female orgasmic disorder and in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 29(1), 39–46. 10.1080/713847100
Updated: