Personal Egogram Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Not at all
- To some extent
- To a considerable extent
- Absolutely true
- Not at all true
- True to some extent
- True to a considerable extent
- Completely true
- Not at all
- To some extent
- To a considerable extent
- Completely true
Personal Egogram Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want a clearer picture of their habitual reactions can use this assessment to explore how different ego states shape communication, decisions, and relationships. The Personal Egogram Test suits anyone seeking a structured way to reflect on recurring interpersonal patterns. An egogram personality test can show which modes appear more readily in everyday situations. The profile offers a starting point for noticing flexibility and areas for change.
What This Assessment Explores
Transactional analysis frames the questionnaire around five ego-state patterns. Items address rules, criticism, care, spontaneity, planning, reasoning, cooperation, boundaries, and responses to mistakes. It suits anyone examining interpersonal habits.
The result dimensions are:
- Adapted Child (AC), 1-12, measures compliance and adjustment: Low adaptation (1-4), Balanced adaptation (5-8), High adaptation (9-12).
- Natural Child (NC), 1-12, measures spontaneity, emotional expression, and creativity: Low (1-4), Moderate (5-8), High (9-12).
- Adult (A), 1-12, measures objective analysis, planning, and fact-based decisions: Low (1-4), Moderate (5-8), High (9-12).
- Nurturing Parent (NP), 1-12, measures empathy, encouragement, and care: Low (1-4), Moderate (5-8), High (9-12).
- Critical Parent (CP), 1-12, measures evaluation, control, order, and correction: Low (1-4), Moderate (5-8), High (9-12).
Together, scores form a profile rather than a good-or-bad judgment. A personal egogram shows which modes are available and where flexibility may help.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement offers four choices from not at all to completely true. Respondents rate how well everyday preferences, reactions, and interpersonal actions fit; there is no correct answer. Responses produce five separate ego-state scores, creating a relative profile rather than one overall rating.
The questionnaire functions as an ego state assessment consistent with Egograms (Dusay, 1972), which applies transactional analysis to Parent, Adult, and Child functioning. Berne’s model provides the framework, while Heyer (1979) and Doelker and Griffiths (1984) show how related ego-state functions can be measured. This online questionnaire is not a direct reproduction or validated adaptation of those instruments.
Interpretation is comparative: a higher score means that a style is more prominent in this profile, not that it is always desirable. The displayed bands organize feedback, but they are not population norms or clinical cutoffs.
Because the online version has no published norms, self-report scores may shift with current mood, self-awareness, and the wish to present oneself favorably. Use the pattern as a reflection prompt, checking it against repeated examples from real interactions before drawing broad conclusions.
- Dusay, John M. (1972). Egograms and the “Constancy Hypothesis.” Transactional Analysis Journal, 2(3), 37-41. 10.1177/036215377200200313
- Heyer, N. Robert (1979). Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Ego States with Some Applications to Social and Comparative Psychiatry. Transactional Analysis Journal, 9(1), 9-19. 10.1177/036215377900900103
- Doelker, Richard E., Jr., and John Griffiths (1984). Development of an Instrument to Measure Ego State Functions and Its Application to Practice. Transactional Analysis Journal, 14(2), 149-152. 10.1177/036215378401400210
- Berne, Eric (1961). Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy: A Systematic Individual and Social Psychiatry. New York: Grove Press. 10.1037/11495-000
Updated: