Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
cbt

Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS) Test

Take the online Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Designed for brief self-reflection, the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS) Test contains 39 questions and takes about 8 minutes. Your result outlines skills in observing, describing, acting with awareness, and accepting experiences without judgment, helping you recognize current strengths and areas for personal growth.
Questions: 398 minutes
Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills: agreement scale card
September 1, 2026September 1, 2026Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
33,263 views
3,639 completions
3,084 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
3,084 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Accepting Without JudgmentAWJ
Measures how well you can experience thoughts and emotions without judging them or trying to avoid or change them.
example score26/45
26/45Moderateexample score
9 – 23Low
24 – 36Moderate
37 – 45High
A score of 26 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a developing ability to accept inner experiences without strong self-criticism, with some judgment still occurring at times.
Acting With AwarenessAWA
Mindful Action measures how consistently you stay focused on what you are doing in the present moment rather than running on autopilot.
example score31/50
31/50Moderateexample score
10 – 22Low
23 – 34Moderate
35 – 50High
A score of 31 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting you often act with awareness but may still slip into autopilot in some routine or distracting situations.
DescribingD
Measures how well you can identify and put your internal experiences (thoughts, feelings, sensations) into words.
example score12/40
12/40Lowexample score
8 – 21Low
22 – 33Moderate
34 – 40High
A score of 12 falls in the Low range, suggesting less consistent ability to label and describe internal experiences in words.
ObservingO
Observation measures how well you notice and attend to internal experiences (sensations, thoughts, emotions) and external stimuli in the present moment.
example score46/60
46/60Higher observationexample score
12 – 29Lower observation
30 – 43Moderate observation
44 – 60Higher observation
A score of 46 falls in the Higher observation range, suggesting you tend to notice sensations, emotions, and environmental details relatively clearly and often.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Therapy and coaching clients
41%OF USERS
People in counseling or coaching use it to pinpoint which mindfulness skills are strong and which need practice for stress, mood, or emotion regulation.
Mindfulness and meditation learners
34%OF USERS
People building a mindfulness habit take it to get clear feedback on observing, describing, staying present, and self-acceptance.
Psychology students and researchers
25%OF USERS
Students and researchers use it to measure mindfulness components in studies, class projects, or clinical assessments.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Acceptance Without JudgmentAWJ
You?
Average35.3
Typical rangeTypical30.8 – 39.8
Possible9 – 45
Mindful ActionMA
You?
Average26.9
Typical rangeTypical19.8 – 34
Possible10 – 50
DescriptionD
You?
Average25.1
Typical rangeTypical19.1 – 31.2
Possible8 – 40
ObservationO
You?
Average45.2
Typical rangeTypical39 – 51.3
Possible12 – 60
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Never or very rarely
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often or always
    • Never or very rarely
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often or always
    • Never or very rarely
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often or always
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS) Test - Description and methodology of the test

cbt
awareness

People who want a structured look at how they notice, describe, and respond to present-moment experience may find the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS) Test useful. It is intended for personal reflection by people who want a clearer picture of everyday mindfulness habits. As a mindfulness assessment, it highlights relative strengths across several skills rather than producing a single global label.

What This Assessment Explores

Rather than asking whether someone is mindful in general, the items sample moments such as noticing bodily sensations, naming feelings, staying with one task, and recognizing self-judgment or distraction. As a mindfulness skills test, it describes present-moment abilities rather than one overall trait.

The four displayed dimensions are:

  • Accepting Without Judgment measures allowing experiences without evaluative judgment or avoidance; its range is 9–45, with Low 9–23, Moderate 24–36, and High 37–45.
  • Acting With Awareness measures focused, deliberate engagement instead of automatic action; its range is 10–50, with Low 10–22, Moderate 23–34, and High 35–50.
  • Describing measures putting thoughts, feelings, and sensations into words; its range is 8–40, with Low 8–21, Moderate 22–33, and High 34–40.
  • Observing measures noticing internal and external details in the present moment; its range is 12–60, with Lower observation 12–29, Moderate observation 30–43, and Higher observation 44–60.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each statement uses one of five frequency choices, from Never or very rarely to Very often or always. Items cover four groups: some describe direct skills, while others describe distraction, difficulty labeling experience, or judging emotions. Responses are combined within each facet; negatively worded statements are interpreted toward the underlying skill before the result is read. Displayed bands organize interpretation but do not establish universal clinical cutoffs.

The evidence base begins with Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS), the four-facet self-report instrument described by Baer, Smith, and Allen in 2004. A later study by Baum and colleagues examined its psychometric properties in clinical populations. The KIMS questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that work, but should not be described as a direct adaptation or assumed to carry the same norms.

Scores are best read as a current self-report snapshot. Mood, stress, self-awareness, mindfulness experience, and a wish to present oneself favorably can influence answers. Meaningful interpretation should consider personal circumstances and other information rather than treating one result as a complete psychological profile.

Literature:
  • Baer, Ruth A., Gregory T. Smith, and Kristin B. Allen. "Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills." Assessment, 11(3), 191–206 (2004). 10.1177/1073191104268029
  • Baum, Corinna, Willem Kuyken, Martin Bohus, Thomas Heidenreich, Johannes Michalak, and Regina Steil. "The Psychometric Properties of the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills in Clinical Populations." Assessment, 17(2), 220–229 (2010). 10.1177/1073191109356525

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment