Group Normative Preference Assessment Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Group Normative Preference Assessment Test - Description and methodology of the test
For readers who want to understand how they approach shared activities, the Group Normative Preference Assessment Test describes the relative value they place on interpersonal connection, cooperation, achievement, and practical group functioning. It suits self-reflection after noticing recurring preferences in classrooms, workplaces, teams, or other organized settings. Your group normative preferences profile can help you consider which expectations guide your participation without reducing a complex social style to one label.
What This Assessment Measures
Rather than measuring one trait, this normative preference assessment examines standards endorsed in group life. Sampled items touch on themes such as praise, criticism, friendship, collegiality, emotional control, self-reliance, rewards, planning, competition, and how relationships affect work. Together, the dimensions concern communication and relationship maintenance, task performance, and shared goals.
The result presents separate levels for communication and relationship-oriented norms, task-oriented norms, and response validity. The displayed scales are:
- Communication Preferences (0-22) assesses the tendency to prioritize norms related to interpersonal communication and maintaining relationships within a group: Lower priority 0-7; Balanced 8-15; High priority 16-22.
- Task-Oriented Preferences (0-22) assesses the tendency to prioritize norms related to task performance and attaining group goals: Low 0-7; Moderate 8-15; High 16-22.
- Lie Scale (0-7) assesses the validity of obtained results; lower scores indicate truthful and sincere responding: Low 0-4; Elevated 5-7.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item is a short Yes-or-No statement about a social expectation or personal reaction. The profile therefore reflects endorsed viewpoints, not observed behavior in a live group. The questionnaire displays scores for the dimensions using the stated ranges and bands; the contribution of each individual Yes-or-No response is not specified.
The theoretical frame is the study of group norms, which distinguishes communication-centred and task-centred orientations in group life. This online questionnaire is not documented as an adaptation, standardized version, or validated version of a named published measure. The displayed categories should therefore be read as this questionnaire’s profile structure, not as established norms from an external instrument.
For interpretation, a group preference questionnaire is best read as a prompt for examining tendencies across situations. Mood, self-presentation, memory, and imagined context can influence yes-or-no answers. An elevated result on the validity scale calls for caution; compare preference patterns with actual behavior rather than treating them as fixed identity.
- Solovyeva, O. V., Dubovskaya, E. M., Komissarova, O. I., et al. Methods of Research into Interpersonal Perception: Special Workshop in Social Psychology. Edited by G. M. Andreeva and V. S. Ageev. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 1984. 103 pp.
- Egorova, A. I., and Makarova, A. P., compilers. Methods of Social Psychology: Methodological Developments for Laboratory and Practical Classes. Yakutsk: Yakutsk State University Press, 2003.
- Postmes, Tom, Russell Spears, and Sezgin Cihangir. “Quality of Decision Making and Group Norms.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80, no. 6 (2001): 918-930. 10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.918
Updated: