Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
psychotherapy

Working Alliance Inventory–Short Form (WAI-S) Test

Take the online Working Alliance Inventory–Short Form (WAI-S) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Working Alliance Inventory–Short Form (WAI-S) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
In two minutes, the Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form (WAI-S) Test uses 10 questions to explore how a client and therapist experience their shared goals, tasks, understanding, and bond. The result can support reflection on the therapeutic relationship and highlight areas for discussion in ongoing psychotherapy.
Questions: 102 minutes
Working Alliance Inventory–Short Form (WAI-S): agreement scale card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
29,547 views
2,960 completions
2,403 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,403 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Therapeutic AllianceTA
Measures the strength of the working relationship between client and therapist, including agreement on goals and tasks and the emotional bond.
example score45/70
45/70Moderate allianceexample score
10 – 34Low alliance
35 – 54Moderate alliance
55 – 70High alliance
A score of 45 indicates a moderate therapeutic alliance, suggesting a generally workable connection with some areas that may benefit from further alignment or discussion.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Practicing psychotherapists
46%OF USERS
Therapists use it to quickly check how aligned they are with a client on goals, tasks, and emotional connection, especially when progress stalls.
Clients in ongoing therapy
34%OF USERS
Clients take it to express whether they feel understood, supported, and working toward shared goals with their therapist.
Supervisors and trainees
20%OF USERS
Supervisors and early-career clinicians use it to track alliance quality over time and spot relationship issues that need discussion.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Therapeutic Alliance ScaleTAS
You?
Average45.4
Typical rangeTypical34.3 – 56.5
Possible10 – 70
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

This questionnaire consists of a set of statements that describe, in various ways, thoughts and feelings that may arise in relation to your client. As you read each statement, mentally insert your client’s name in place of the underline in the text. Beneath each statement is a scale with seven response options. Respond quickly and without overthinking. Select the first response that comes to mind. The goal is to capture your initial reaction.
    • Never
    • Very rarely
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often
    • Always
    • Never
    • Very rarely
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often
    • Always
    • Never
    • Very rarely
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often
    • Always
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Working Alliance Inventory–Short Form (WAI-S) Test - Description and methodology of the test

psychotherapy

Clients and therapists seeking a clearer view of their work can use this questionnaire to reflect on cooperation, direction, and trust. The Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form (WAI-S) Test is intended for those considering an ongoing therapeutic relationship. It reflects the respondent’s experience at completion and should be interpreted within the broader relationship. As a working alliance assessment, it clarifies perceptions of shared goals, therapy tasks, mutual understanding, and bond.

What This Assessment Explores

The questionnaire functions as a therapeutic alliance measure by focusing on whether the client and therapist understand one another, agree on what to work on, and feel confident in their shared approach. The items also address trust, appreciation, liking, and the sense that therapy is moving toward useful change.

The displayed result uses one Therapeutic Alliance scale, ranging from 10-70. The visitor sees these bands:

  • Low alliance (10-34) suggests that trust, shared direction, or mutual understanding may be difficult to establish.
  • Moderate alliance (35-54) is an intermediate reported level of alliance.
  • High alliance (55-70) reflects strong reported agreement, understanding, and emotional connection in the therapeutic work.

The bands describe the reported level of alliance at the time of responding; they do not explain why the relationship feels that way.

Methodology and Evidence Base

The WAI-S questionnaire in this assessment is a ten-item online form using relational statements about shared goals, therapy tasks, confidence, trust, and personal understanding. Its response scale runs from Never to Always through seven ordered options, showing how consistently each statement fits the therapeutic relationship.

This ten-item questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the WAI/WAI-S model of goals, tasks, and bond, but it is not identical to the published WAI-S, which contains twelve items.

This online version has no stated standardization, norms, or documented scoring algorithm. Read the result using the displayed catalogue bands rather than as a validated norm-referenced score.

Tracey and Kokotovic (1989) describe the published short form; Horvath and Greenberg (1989) provide broader WAI validation context, and Bordin (1979) supplies the goals-tasks-bond theory. These sources support the construct and theory, not validation of this specific online form.

Use the result as a focused snapshot alongside the broader course of therapy; self-report can be shaped by current mood, expectations, openness, and whether the respondent answers as a client or therapist.

Author: Adam O. Horvath, Edward S. Bordin, Leslie S. Greenberg
Literature:
  • Tracey, Terence J., & Kokotovic, Anna M. (1989). Factor structure of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1(3), 207–210. 10.1037/1040-3590.1.3.207
  • Horvath, Adam O., & Greenberg, Leslie S. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(2), 223–233. 10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223
  • Bordin, Edward S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16(3), 252–260. 10.1037/h0085885

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment