Career Self-Efficacy Sources Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Very often
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Very often
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Very often
Career Self-Efficacy Sources Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
People considering a new role, entering the workforce, or reviewing their approach to job seeking may use the Career Self-Efficacy Sources Scale Test to understand what strengthens or restrains their confidence. As a career confidence assessment, it maps emotional, experiential, social, and observational influences on engagement in job-search and career-development activity, helping respondents recognize which experiences and social inputs are associated with participation or self-inhibition.
What the Test Measures
Career self-efficacy means confidence in job-search activity. It maps sources of career self-efficacy to engagement or self-inhibition, not one global judgment.
These five scales describe the dimensions:
- Negative Emotional State (4-20) shows emotional inhibition of activity: Low inhibition 4-9, Moderate inhibition 10-15, High inhibition 16-20.
- Positive Emotional State (4-20) shows positive mood and self-motivation driving activity: Low positive state 4-9, Moderate positive state 10-15, High positive state 16-20.
- Mastery Experiences (4-20) shows reliance on past successes and strategies: Low reliance 4-9, Moderate reliance 10-15, High reliance 16-20.
- Verbal Persuasion (4-20) shows confidence from others’ encouragement: Low 4-9, Moderate 10-15, High 16-20.
- Vicarious Learning (4-20) shows reliance on successful models and strategies: Low 4-9, Moderate 10-15, High 16-20.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement uses a five-point frequency format-Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, or Very often-and addresses peer models, past achievements, encouragement, emotional reactions, or confidence in ability. Responses are grouped by source; higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of the tendency represented by a scale.
The questionnaire is a career self-efficacy scale conceptually consistent with Nasta’s 2007 work and Bandura’s model, but it should not be described as a reproduction or adaptation of Nasta’s instrument. Its structure reflects Bandura’s routes to efficacy: mastery, persuasion, emotional states, and vicarious experience.
Lent, Brown, and Hackett’s social cognitive career framework, together with later work by Lent and colleagues on career exploration, explains how personal experience and social context can jointly shape confidence. The result bands are descriptive levels for this questionnaire rather than norm-referenced cutoffs.
Scores remain sensitive to current job-search circumstances, mood, memory, self-awareness, and socially favorable responding. Interpret the profile as a reflection aid for identifying supports and barriers, not a fixed measure of future career success.
- Nasta, Kristen A. (2007). Influence of career self-efficacy beliefs on career exploration behaviors. Unpublished master's thesis, State University of New York at New Paltz.
- Lent, Robert W., Ireland, Glenn W., Penn, Lee T., Morris, Taylor R., and Sappington, Ryan. (2017). Sources of self-efficacy and outcome expectations for career exploration and decision-making: A test of the social cognitive model of career self-management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 107-117. 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.01.002
- Lent, Robert W., Brown, Steven D., and Hackett, Gail. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122. 10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
- Bandura, Albert. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
Updated: