Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
career growth

Career Self-Efficacy Sources Scale Test

Take the online Career Self-Efficacy Sources Scale Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Career Self-Efficacy Sources Scale Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
In four minutes, the Career Self-Efficacy Sources Scale Test guides you through 20 questions about the experiences that shape confidence during job seeking and career development. Your result highlights emotional, experiential, social, and observational influences, supporting focused self-reflection about strengths and helpful resources.
Questions: 204 minutes
Career Self-Efficacy Sources Scale Test: agreement scale card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
30,025 views
3,252 completions
2,882 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,882 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Negative Emotional StateNES
Measures the extent to which negative emotions, insecurity, and past failures inhibit job search and career-building activity.
example score12/20
12/20Moderate inhibitionexample score
4 – 9Low inhibition
10 – 15Moderate inhibition
16 – 20High inhibition
A score of 12 falls in the Moderate inhibition range, suggesting negative feelings and self-doubt sometimes slow career actions, but are not consistently blocking progress.
Positive Emotional StatePES
Measures how much a generally positive emotional state, self-motivation, and reliance on positive emotions support active job searching and career building.
example score13/20
13/20Moderate positive stateexample score
4 – 9Low positive state
10 – 15Moderate positive state
16 – 20High positive state
A score of 13 indicates a moderately positive emotional state that generally supports career activity, though it may fluctuate depending on circumstances.
Mastery ExperiencesME
Personal Experience measures how strongly you draw confidence from past successes and apply proven strategies to current and future career tasks.
example score19/20
19/20High relianceexample score
4 – 9Low reliance
10 – 15Moderate reliance
16 – 20High reliance
A score of 19 indicates a high reliance on past achievements as a key source of career confidence and a tendency to carry effective approaches forward.
Verbal PersuasionVP
Measures how much your confidence in starting and developing a career is supported by encouragement and approval from significant others.
example score13/20
13/20Moderateexample score
4 – 9Low
10 – 15Moderate
16 – 20High
A score of 13 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting you generally draw some career-start confidence from others’ verbal support, though it is not consistently strong.
Vicarious LearningVL
Indirect Learning measures how much you build career confidence by observing and applying others’ successful job-search and career-building strategies.
example score17/20
17/20Highexample score
4 – 9Low
10 – 15Moderate
16 – 20High
A score of 17 falls in the High range, suggesting you frequently draw on role models and proven approaches from others to strengthen your career self-efficacy.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Career changers and returners
41%OF USERS
People planning a new direction or coming back after a break use it to understand what fuels their confidence and where they need more support.
Early-career professionals
34%OF USERS
Students, interns, and junior specialists take it to see which experiences and skills most strengthen their belief that they can succeed.
Coaching and HR clients
25%OF USERS
Clients in counseling, training, or development programs use it to pinpoint confidence drivers and prioritize concrete next steps.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Emotional state (neg)
You?
Average8.6
Typical rangeTypical6 – 11.2
Possible4 – 20
Emotional State (Posture)
You?
Average9.6
Typical rangeTypical7.4 – 11.9
Possible4 – 20
Personal ExperiencePE
You?
Average13
Typical rangeTypical10.5 – 15.4
Possible4 – 20
Verbal SuggestionVS
You?
Average14.4
Typical rangeTypical11.5 – 17.3
Possible4 – 20
Indirect LearningIL
You?
Average10.5
Typical rangeTypical7.5 – 13.5
Possible4 – 20
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Never
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often
    • Never
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often
    • Never
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Career Self-Efficacy Sources Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test

career growth
self-efficacy

People considering a new role, entering the workforce, or reviewing their approach to job seeking may use the Career Self-Efficacy Sources Scale Test to understand what strengthens or restrains their confidence. As a career confidence assessment, it maps emotional, experiential, social, and observational influences on engagement in job-search and career-development activity, helping respondents recognize which experiences and social inputs are associated with participation or self-inhibition.

What the Test Measures

Career self-efficacy means confidence in job-search activity. It maps sources of career self-efficacy to engagement or self-inhibition, not one global judgment.

These five scales describe the dimensions:

  • Negative Emotional State (4-20) shows emotional inhibition of activity: Low inhibition 4-9, Moderate inhibition 10-15, High inhibition 16-20.
  • Positive Emotional State (4-20) shows positive mood and self-motivation driving activity: Low positive state 4-9, Moderate positive state 10-15, High positive state 16-20.
  • Mastery Experiences (4-20) shows reliance on past successes and strategies: Low reliance 4-9, Moderate reliance 10-15, High reliance 16-20.
  • Verbal Persuasion (4-20) shows confidence from others’ encouragement: Low 4-9, Moderate 10-15, High 16-20.
  • Vicarious Learning (4-20) shows reliance on successful models and strategies: Low 4-9, Moderate 10-15, High 16-20.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each statement uses a five-point frequency format-Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, or Very often-and addresses peer models, past achievements, encouragement, emotional reactions, or confidence in ability. Responses are grouped by source; higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of the tendency represented by a scale.

The questionnaire is a career self-efficacy scale conceptually consistent with Nasta’s 2007 work and Bandura’s model, but it should not be described as a reproduction or adaptation of Nasta’s instrument. Its structure reflects Bandura’s routes to efficacy: mastery, persuasion, emotional states, and vicarious experience.

Lent, Brown, and Hackett’s social cognitive career framework, together with later work by Lent and colleagues on career exploration, explains how personal experience and social context can jointly shape confidence. The result bands are descriptive levels for this questionnaire rather than norm-referenced cutoffs.

Scores remain sensitive to current job-search circumstances, mood, memory, self-awareness, and socially favorable responding. Interpret the profile as a reflection aid for identifying supports and barriers, not a fixed measure of future career success.

Author: G. Hackett, N. E. Betz
Literature:
  • Nasta, Kristen A. (2007). Influence of career self-efficacy beliefs on career exploration behaviors. Unpublished master's thesis, State University of New York at New Paltz.
  • Lent, Robert W., Ireland, Glenn W., Penn, Lee T., Morris, Taylor R., and Sappington, Ryan. (2017). Sources of self-efficacy and outcome expectations for career exploration and decision-making: A test of the social cognitive model of career self-management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 107-117. 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.01.002
  • Lent, Robert W., Brown, Steven D., and Hackett, Gail. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122. 10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
  • Bandura, Albert. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment