Crisis Personality Profile Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Crisis Personality Profile Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand how they may react when circumstances become overwhelming can use the Crisis Personality Profile Test as a structured point of self-reflection. To explore this pattern, the test offers a crisis personality assessment focused on emotional strain, physical symptoms, thinking, and coping behavior. Its result indicates possible personal resources and vulnerabilities during demanding events.
What This Assessment Explores
The items cover bodily discomfort, anxiety, sleep and appetite changes, narrowed attention, intrusive memories, self-criticism, numbness, impulsive decisions, withdrawal, and increased alcohol use. These yes-or-no items describe crisis-related reactions and behaviours.
The crisis coping profile is an overall pattern the single scale interprets as personality characteristics that may shape crisis experience and coping, including related resources and vulnerabilities.
The main themes are:
- Physical reactions show how distress may appear through headaches, breathing difficulty, fatigue, nausea, or disturbed sleep.
- Emotional and cognitive strain reflects anxiety, numbness, guilt, self-criticism, hopelessness, and concentration problems.
- Behavioral and perceptual disruption covers narrowed attention, altered self-experience, impulsivity, avoidance, isolation, and trouble with usual responsibilities.
The single Crisis Personality Profile scale runs from 0-100. Results are labelled Lower impact (0-33), Moderate impact (34-66), or Higher impact (67-100); the bands indicate how the overall pattern may affect crisis experience and coping, not a permanent personality type.
Methodology and Evidence Base
As a crisis personality questionnaire, it uses yes-or-no responses to ask whether a described reaction applies, not how intensely it occurs. The result is presented on one 0-100 scale, but the questionnaire does not specify how individual responses contribute. Interpret the displayed score through its result bands; it represents a broad pattern, not a definitive label.
Conceptually, the questionnaire is consistent with Halpern's 1973 work on crisis theory and definition, which organizes crisis reactions across psychological and physical domains. His 1975 publication on the Crisis Scale, its factor analysis, and revision supports a multidimensional view. These works support conceptual interpretation but do not establish norms or standardization for this online version.
Hobfoll's 1998 framework places coping in social and cultural context, while Everly and Lating's 2013 guide distinguishes stress responses from coping. Together, they add context for interpreting the profile.
Current mood, memory, self-awareness, willingness to disclose, and binary choices can affect self-report. Read the result alongside the event and coping resources that prompted completion; it cannot alone establish a diagnosis or determine needed support.
- Halpern, Howard A. (1973). Crisis theory: A definitional study. Community Mental Health Journal, 9(4), 342-349. 10.1007/BF01410870
- Halpern, Howard A. (1975). The crisis scale: A factor analysis and revision. Community Mental Health Journal, 11(3), 295-300. 10.1007/BF01424810
- Hobfoll, Stevan E. (1998). Stress, Culture, and Community: The Psychology and Philosophy of Stress. Plenum Press. 10.1007/978-1-4899-0115-6
- Everly, George S., Jr., and Jeffrey M. Lating. (2013). A Clinical Guide to the Treatment of the Human Stress Response (3rd ed.). Springer. 10.1007/978-1-4614-5538-7
Updated: