Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
management

Manager and Human Relations Test

Take the online Manager and Human Relations Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Manager and Human Relations Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand your workplace attitude toward coworkers and direct reports in about 15 minutes. 80 quick items reveal strengths and blind spots so you can lead and collaborate more effectively.
Start Online Test
Questions: 8015 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
31,638 views
3,869 completions
3,376 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
55/80
Number of Correct Responses (NoCR)
Measures how many items were answered in line with the test key, reflecting accuracy in understanding human-relations statements.
Low
Moderate
High
026: Low | 2753: Moderate | 5480: High
A score of 55 falls in the High range, indicating a relatively strong number of key-aligned responses on this test.
example score
50/95
Standard Score (SS)
Measures a manager’s interpersonal competence and effectiveness in working with others compared with a large managerial norm group.
Needs development
Typical range
Strong
525: Needs development | 2674: Typical range | 7595: Strong
A score of 50 falls in the Typical range, suggesting interpersonal effectiveness that is broadly in line with most managers, with room for targeted refinement.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

New and aspiring managers
41%OF USERS
People stepping into leadership use it to check how their attitude toward others affects trust, motivation, and day-to-day team interactions.
HR and L&D specialists
34%OF USERS
People in talent and development use it to spot interpersonal strengths and blind spots that may impact collaboration, coaching, or culture.
Team members in conflict
25%OF USERS
Employees facing tension with colleagues or supervisors take it to understand their own communication style and where it may come across as critical or closed off.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Number of correct answers (Noca)
Number of correct answers (Noca)
Average
38.4
Normal range
26.949.9
min.
0
max.
80
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Standard assessment (Sa)
Standard assessment (Sa)
Average
67.9
Normal range
53.382.5
min.
5
max.
95
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • True
    • False
    • True
    • False
    • True
    • False
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Manager and Human Relations Test

Manager and Human Relations Test - Symptoms and Signs

management

This instrument is designed to assess interpersonal attitudes relevant to workplace relationships, including how an individual typically views and approaches colleagues, supervisors, and direct reports. Manager and Human Relations focuses on identifying general relational orientations rather than technical knowledge, using self-report responses to statements about communication and interaction.

The measure consists of 80 items and typically requires about 15 minutes to complete. Results are commonly interpreted along a continuum from more positive, open attitudes toward others to more critical or distrustful perspectives, with clinical judgment used to consider situational fit and potential response bias.

Manager and Human Relations may be used in organizational or coaching contexts to support discussion of communication style, relational strengths, and potential barriers to effective collaboration or leadership. Scores should be interpreted in conjunction with other assessment data and the individual’s role demands.

Author: Rensis Likert
Literature: Yukl, G. Leadership in organizations. Prentice Hall. 1998.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment