Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
identity

Identity Resilience Index (IRI) Test

Take the online Identity Resilience Index (IRI) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Identity Resilience Index (IRI) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
In about three minutes, the Identity Resilience Index (IRI) Test presents 16 questions about confidence, self-worth, uniqueness, and the coherence and stability of identity as circumstances change. Your result can highlight how you approach difficulties and change, offering a concise profile for self-reflection and a clearer view of personal strengths.
Questions: 163 minutes
Identity Resilience Index (IRI): situation and reply bubbles
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
33,865 views
2,718 completions
2,392 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,392 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

UniquenessU
Uniqueness measures how strongly a person feels distinct and one-of-a-kind compared with others.
example score11/20
11/20Moderateexample score
4 – 9Low
10 – 14Moderate
15 – 20High
A score of 11 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a balanced sense of being different from others without it being a dominant part of self-view.
IntegrityI
Integrity measures how coherent, internally consistent, and stable a person’s sense of self feels across situations.
example score16/20
16/20High integrityexample score
4 – 9Low integrity
10 – 14Moderate integrity
15 – 20High integrity
A score of 16 falls in the High integrity range, indicating a generally coherent and internally consistent identity that tends to remain stable amid change.
Self-EfficacySE
Self-efficacy measures confidence in one’s ability to achieve goals and handle challenges effectively.
example score9/20
9/20Lowexample score
4 – 9Low
10 – 15Moderate
16 – 20High
A score of 9 falls in the Low range, suggesting relatively limited confidence in managing challenges and reaching goals at this time.
Self-EsteemSE
This scale measures how positively a person evaluates their own worth and significance as part of identity stability.
example score14/20
14/20Moderateexample score
4 – 9Low
10 – 15Moderate
16 – 20High
A score of 14 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a generally positive but somewhat variable sense of personal worth that may support identity resilience in many situations.
Identity Resilience IndexIRI
Measures how well a person maintains a coherent, stable sense of self when facing stress or change, integrating self-esteem, self-efficacy, integrity, and uniqueness.
example score57/80
57/80Moderate stabilityexample score
16 – 37Low stability
38 – 58Moderate stability
59 – 80High stability
A score of 57 indicates moderate identity stability, suggesting generally reliable self-coherence with some sensitivity to stress or change.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

People Under Stressful Change
41%OF USERS
They take it during transitions like a new job, breakup, relocation, or burnout to see how stable their self-esteem and sense of self are.
Therapy and Coaching Clients
34%OF USERS
They use it with a psychologist or coach to quickly map strengths and weak spots in self-efficacy, integrity, and uniqueness before planning support.
Students and Early Careers
25%OF USERS
They take it to understand confidence, identity clarity, and resilience while choosing a path and handling academic or career pressure.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
UniquenessU
You?
Average13.5
Typical rangeTypical11.1 – 16
Possible4 – 20
IntegrityI
You?
Average10.2
Typical rangeTypical8 – 12.5
Possible4 – 20
Self-EfficacyS
You?
Average10.4
Typical rangeTypical7.6 – 13.3
Possible4 – 20
Self-EsteemS
You?
Average11.6
Typical rangeTypical9.1 – 14.2
Possible4 – 20
Identity Stability IndexISI
You?
Average57.3
Typical rangeTypical45.4 – 69.1
Possible16 – 80
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Partly agree
    • Agree
    • Completely agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Partly agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Partly agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Identity Resilience Index (IRI) Test - Description and methodology of the test

identity
self-efficacy

People facing a transition, demanding decision, or prolonged uncertainty may use the Identity Resilience Index (IRI) Test to pause and examine how secure and adaptable their sense of self feels. An identity resilience assessment offers a structured starting point for noticing patterns that deserve attention, especially when everyday reactions are difficult to interpret in isolation.

What This Assessment Explores

This questionnaire examines whether a person can maintain a coherent sense of self as circumstances, relationships, or demands change. It is a structured identity resilience questionnaire with a descriptive, dimension-focused profile.

The result reports four component scales and one composite index:

  • Self-Efficacy (4-20) measures confidence in achieving goals and coping with difficulties: Low 4-9, Moderate 10-15, High 16-20.
  • Self-Esteem (4-20) measures perceived personal worth: Low 4-9, Moderate 10-15, High 16-20.
  • Uniqueness (4-20) measures a sense of distinctiveness from others: Low 4-9, Moderate 10-14, High 15-20.
  • Integrity (4-20) measures identity coherence and continuity between past and present: Low integrity 4-9, Moderate integrity 10-14, High integrity 15-20.
  • Identity Resilience Index (16-80) combines the four component scales to indicate identity stability during change: Low stability 16-37, Moderate stability 38-58, High stability 59-80.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Responses use a five-point agreement scale from strong disagreement to strong agreement. The 16 statements address self-evaluation, coping with difficult or unexpected events, continuity between past and present, and uniqueness. This online personal identity questionnaire is a structured self-report exercise, not an interview or performance task.

Scoring is dimensional: responses are summarized within four component areas and combined into the overall index. Displayed ranges describe levels within this questionnaire; they do not show how every response is weighted.

The closest evidence is Identity Resilience Index (Breakwell et al., 2022), a published instrument validated in two UK samples. Breakwell’s framework links identity processes with coping under threat. Vignoles, Chryssochoou, and Breakwell treat self-esteem as one identity motive among several; Simsek and Yalincetin support the relevance of uniqueness. This questionnaire is an online adaptation of that published 16-item measure, not a separate construct.

The online questionnaire has not been standardized against those UK samples. Its displayed bands are questionnaire-specific rather than norms from those samples; interpret them as a structured description. Mood, self-awareness, memory, and socially desirable responding can shape self-report.

Author: Erik H. Erikson, Jack Block
Literature:
  • Breakwell, G. M., Fino, E., & Jaspal, R. (2022). The Identity Resilience Index: Development and Validation in Two UK Samples. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 22(2), 166-182. 10.1080/15283488.2021.1957895
  • Breakwell, G. M. (2021). Identity resilience: Its origins in identity processes and its role in coping with threat. Contemporary Social Science, 16(5), 573-588. 10.1080/21582041.2021.1999488
  • Vignoles, V. L., Chryssochoou, X., & Breakwell, G. M. (2002). Evaluating models of identity motivation: Self-esteem is not the whole story. Self and Identity, 1(3), 201-218. 10.1080/152988602760124847
  • Simsek, O. F., & Yalincetin, B. (2010). I feel unique, therefore I am: The development and preliminary validation of the personal sense of uniqueness (PSU) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6), 576-581. 10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.006

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment