Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
analyticity

Comparative Value Indices Test

Take the online Comparative Value Indices Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Comparative Value Indices Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand how someone prefers to think and process information in about 5 minutes. Fast, practical insights help tailor teaching and communication to detail focused or big picture learners.
Start Online Test
Questions: 255 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
22,790 views
2,502 completions
2,150 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
80/125
Cognitive Style (CS)
Measures preference in information processing from detail-focused analytical (ectenic) to big-picture holistic (synoptic), including an intermediate situational style.
Ectenic (Detail-focused)
Situational (Balanced)
Synoptic (Big-picture)
2565: Ectenic (Detail-focused) | 6685: Situational (Balanced) | 86125: Synoptic (Big-picture)
A score of 80 falls in the Situational (Balanced) range, suggesting flexible use of both detailed analysis and holistic understanding depending on the context.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Teachers and Trainers
41%OF USERS
They take it to quickly see whether learners prefer details or big-picture explanations so they can adjust how they teach.
School Psychologists
34%OF USERS
They use it to support learning assessments and improve communication strategies with students and educators.
Curious Learners
25%OF USERS
They take it to understand their own thinking style and choose study methods that fit how they process information.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Cognitive Style (CS)
Cognitive Style (CS)
Average
51.9
Normal range
35.368.5
min.
25
max.
125
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

Select the response that most accurately describes you. If more than one response applies, choose the one that best reflects your behavior recently, under stress, or when you are under time pressure. If you have experience with a specific situation described in an item, indicate your most likely reaction.
    • find them easily
    • find them after some searching
    • rarely find them
    • find them after someone points out one or several of them to you
    • positive tension
    • joy
    • upset
    • anger
    • only the differences between them
    • only their similarities
    • differences first, then similarities
    • similarities first, then differences
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Comparative Value Indices Liver, ISCL Test

Comparative Value Indices Test - Symptoms and Signs

analyticity
cognitive style

This brief self-report measure is used to characterize relative patterns in personal values and preferences. Comparative Value Indices can support clinical formulation, psychoeducational consultation, or research by providing a structured snapshot of value priorities and their comparative salience (Rokeach; Schwartz).

The instrument includes 25 items and typically requires about 5 minutes to complete. Comparative Value Indices results are interpreted in context of the referral question and other assessment data, and they are not intended to serve as a stand-alone diagnostic indicator.

Author: Milton Rokeach, Shalom H. Schwartz
Literature: Riding, R. J., & Cheema, I. Cognitive styles—An overview and integration. Educational Psychology. 1991.; Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L.-F. Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2001.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment