Overall Job Satisfaction Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- Partly
- No
- Yes
- Partly true
- No
- Yes
- Not with everyone
- No
Overall Job Satisfaction Test - Description and methodology of the test
For employees reflecting on workplace experience, the Overall Job Satisfaction Test offers a structured profile of working conditions, relationships, motivation, achievement, and responsibility. It is useful when you want to examine relationships, motivation, achievement, and responsibility rather than reduce experience to one impression. This overall job satisfaction assessment can support focused self-reflection or a constructive workplace conversation.
What This Assessment Explores
This job satisfaction questionnaire covers:
- Satisfaction With Working Conditions (0-8) measures fit with expectations/needs; Satisfaction With Management (0-8) measures trust/support: Low satisfaction 0-2; Moderate satisfaction 3-5; High satisfaction 6-8.
- Satisfaction With Colleagues (0-8) measures group relations; Satisfaction With Achievements (0-8) measures satisfaction with professional success: Low 0-2; Moderate 3-5; High 6-8.
- Interest in Work (0-8) measures task engagement: Low interest 0-2; Moderate interest 3-5; High interest 6-8.
- Work Preference (0-8) values work over pay: Earnings-first 0-2; Balanced 3-5; Meaning-first 6-8.
- Level of Aspiration (0-8) measures ambition; Professional Responsibility (0-8) measures conscientiousness: Low 0-2; Moderate 3-5; High 6-8. Overall Job Satisfaction (0-100) integrates work-group well-being: Low 0-44; Average 45-55; High 56-100.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item is a first-person statement about work, answered with three graded choices such as Yes, Partly, or No. The questionnaire reports domain scores alongside an overall score, and the displayed bands provide the available interpretation. This format separates broad workplace impressions from more specific patterns, so a single overall result can be read alongside the domains that contribute to it.
The closest source is Integral Job Satisfaction (Batarshev, 2002), an instrument that brings conditions, management, colleagues, achievement, interest, aspiration, and responsibility into one profile. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that work, not a direct adaptation. The source offers a comparison for the grouped workplace dimensions but does not establish the online questionnaire's measurement properties.
The online questionnaire is a workplace satisfaction test with unstandardized scoring: its displayed scores have no population norms or clinical cutoffs. Current circumstances, self-awareness, and response bias can shape answers, so the profile is best used to identify patterns for reflection and discussion.
- Batarshev, A. V. (2002). Integral Job Satisfaction. In N. P. Fetiskin, V. V. Kozlov, and G. M. Manuilov (Eds.), Socio-Psychological Diagnostics of Personality Development and Small Groups (pp. 470-473). Moscow: Institute of Psychotherapy Publishing House.
- Barysheva, T. A., and Danilova, A. A. (2023). Assessment of Satisfaction with Work in Teams with Different Levels of Staff Turnover. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Education and Healthcare, 22(2), 41-46. 10.47475/2409-4102-2023-22-2-41-46.
- Skripnichenko, L. (2021). Professional Personnel Adaptation: Essence and Features. Management of Personnel and Intellectual Resources in Russia, 10(5), 34-40. 10.12737/2305-7807-2021-10-5-34-40.
Updated: