Alternative Method Test
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- A) with attractive coloration;
- B) with interesting behavior.
- A) collecting a herbarium of medicinal plants;
- B) collecting plants to make tinctures.
- A) the structure of animals.
- B) how to care for animals.
Alternative Method Test - Description and methodology of the test
People wanting to understand their relationship with living systems can use the Alternative Method Test as a brief self-reflection tool. It is intended for readers curious about whether their interests lean toward observing nature, caring for living things, or applying knowledge. This ecological attitude test gives one overall indication of ecological consciousness, including environmental awareness and responsibility, rather than a personality label.
What This Assessment Explores
Questions place the respondent in nature-related situations that contrast noticing, caring for, cultivating, or using living things.
Readers who prefer concrete choices over broad self-descriptions may find this ecological consciousness questionnaire more engaging.
The questions represent several themes rather than separate scored traits:
- Interest in nature shows how the respondent responds to beauty, structure, behaviour, and seasonal qualities.
- Care for living things reflects preferences for protecting, maintaining, cultivating, or supporting plants and animals.
- Practical knowledge represents interest in applying biological and agricultural understanding to real situations.
- Choices about conservation and use bring together preferences for monitoring, care, cultivation, and productive activity.
The assessment uses one scale, Alternative Method: 0-100, with Low 0-39, Moderate 40-69, and High 70-100. The result gives one overall level of ecological attitude and consciousness, including environmental awareness and responsibility, rather than separate scores or a fixed personality type.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
The questionnaire uses a forced-choice self-report format: each item offers two preferences, such as admiring a plant or wanting to grow it, caring for an animal or using it for protection, and monitoring trees or supervising timber harvesting. This makes the task concrete, but choices may remain situation-specific.
Responses become the displayed score, but the exact contribution of each answer is not specified, so item-level points should not be inferred. When interpreting the environmental attitude score, compare its reported level with the catalogue definition and usual conduct.
The closest conceptual reference is the published Alternative method. This online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that method but is not presented as a direct reproduction or adaptation of that instrument. No standardized norms are stated for this presentation, so the bands offer orientation rather than diagnostic interpretation; current interests, social desirability, and self-awareness may influence this brief self-report, which is best used as structured reflection alongside wider evidence.
- Deryabo, S. D., and Yasvin, V. A. (1995). Methods for Diagnosing and Correcting Attitudes Toward Nature. Moscow: TsKFL RAO, 147 pp.
- Bashkireva, T. V., Bashkireva, A. V., Shatokhina, L. V., Prutzkow, A., and Morozov, A. V. (2023). Ecological Attitude and Motivation as a Factor of Social Health for the Biosphere Values of the Individual. E3S Web of Conferences, 431, 09002. 10.1051/e3sconf/202343109002
- Yasvin, V. A. (2000). Psychology of Attitude to Nature. Moscow: Smysl, 456 pp. ISBN 5-89357-063-4.
Updated: