Home1
Psychological tests2
Brief Meaning-in-Life Crisis Questionnaire3

Brief Meaning-in-Life Crisis Questionnaire Test

In three minutes, the Brief Meaning-in-Life Crisis Questionnaire Test uses 16 statements to explore experiences connected with meaning, direction, personal agency, and inner emptiness. Your result can highlight patterns in how you relate to life goals and values, supporting focused self-reflection and a clearer understanding of your current experience.

Questions: 163 minutes

Brief Meaning-in-Life Crisis Questionnaire: situation and reply bubbles

October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published

19,901 view

1,626 completions

1,338 likes

Daniel Hall Psychologist · Test reviewer

1,338 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Meaning DysregulationMD

Assesses the degree of meaning dysregulation, including inner emptiness, apathy, and anxiety linked to unmet need for life purpose.

example score15/24

15/24Moderateexample score

6 – 11Low

12 – 17Moderate

18 – 24High

A score of 15 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not extreme level of meaning-related emptiness or dissatisfaction with purpose.

Life Activity DisintegrationLAD

Measures how coherent and continuous a person’s life goals and actions feel versus fragmented and disconnected.

example score9/16

9/16Partly fragmentedexample score

4 – 8Coherent

9 – 12Partly fragmented

13 – 16Highly fragmented

A score of 9 falls in the partly fragmented range, suggesting some loss of continuity and unified direction in life goals and day-to-day actions.

DesubjectivizationD

This scale assesses reduced personal agency, weakened clarity of life goals and values, and a tendency toward reactive rather than self-directed behavior.

example score19/24

19/24Highexample score

6 – 11Low

12 – 17Moderate

18 – 24High

A score of 19 falls in the High range, suggesting pronounced difficulties with stable meaningful direction and internally driven motivation, with behavior more often guided by immediate reactions.

Overall Meaning-in-Life CrisisOMiLC

Measures the overall intensity of experiences associated with a meaning-in-life crisis, integrating feelings of lost meaning and existential disorientation.

example score44/64

44/64Moderateexample score

16 – 31Low

32 – 47Moderate

48 – 64High

A score of 44 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not extreme level of meaning-related crisis experiences and internal disorientation.

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Stuck in a life rut

41%OF USERS

People who feel empty or directionless and want a quick snapshot of how strong their loss of meaning and inner tension is.

At a major crossroads

34%OF USERS

Those facing big decisions (career, relationships, relocation) who notice doubt, inner conflict, and trouble choosing a path.

Therapy and counseling clients

25%OF USERS

People already working with a psychologist who use a brief check-in to track crisis symptoms and changes over time.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.

Shaded area — where most people score

Dot — the average

You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test

Semantic DysregulationSD

You?

Average16.6

Typical rangeTypical13.4 – 19.7

Possible6 – 24

Disintegration of Vital ActivityDoVA

You?

Average9

Typical rangeTypical7.2 – 10.7

Possible4 – 16

Desubjectivization of PersonalityDoP

You?

Average10.9

Typical rangeTypical7.7 – 14

Possible6 – 24

Overall Level of Existential CrisisOLoEC

You?

Average41.1

Typical rangeTypical32.3 – 50

Possible16 – 64

Featured On

SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

Below is a list of statements describing different ways a person may relate to their own life. Please read each statement carefully and indicate the extent to which it applies to you. Select the response option that best reflects your opinion. Do not spend too much time thinking about your answers. Provide the response that comes to mind first. Do not skip any statements, and remember that there are no right or wrong, good or bad answers.

- Completely untrue
- Probably not true
- Probably true
- Completely true
- Completely untrue
- Probably untrue
- Probably true
- Completely true
- Completely untrue
- Probably untrue
- Probably true
- Completely true

These are 3 of the 16 real questions — the rest appear in the test. No sign-up needed to start.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Brief Meaning-in-Life Crisis Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test

existential psychology

meaningfulness

life crisis

For readers deciding whether a difficult period merits closer self-examination, the Brief Meaning-in-Life Crisis Questionnaire Test offers a structured way to organize personal observations. The questionnaire functions as a meaning-in-life crisis test by helping someone identify which experiences deserve attention, rather than reducing a complex life situation to a single label. It may suit people considering changes in priorities or seeking language for a difficult transition.

What This Assessment Explores

The purpose of this meaning in life questionnaire is to examine purpose when familiar goals, values, or routines no longer provide structure. Statements address emptiness, purposeless activity, uncertainty about values, fragmented action, reactive decisions, and difficulty maintaining direction. Three component scales and the overall crisis index are:

Meaning Dysregulation (6-24) reflects inner emptiness, apathy, and unmet need for meaning; higher scores may be associated with existential frustration and anxiety during that search; Low 6-11, Moderate 12-17, High 18-24.
Life Activity Disintegration (4-16) describes weakened continuity between goals and actions; Coherent 4-8, Partly fragmented 9-12, Highly fragmented 13-16.
Desubjectivization (6-24) indicates reduced agency, awareness of personal goals and values, and reactive patterns; Low 6-11, Moderate 12-17, High 18-24.
Overall Meaning-in-Life Crisis (16-64) integrates meaning-related difficulties into a broad crisis index; Low 16-31, Moderate 32-47, High 48-64.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each item is a first-person statement answered on a four-point scale from complete untruth or falsity to complete truth. The statements cover meaning, long-term aims, daily activity, decisions, agency, and continuity between actions and values. Responses are organized into component scales and combined in the overall index; stronger totals indicate greater endorsement of crisis-related experiences, while bands show the assigned result level.

Methodologically, the questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Meaning-in-Life Crisis Questionnaire published in 2008. That 2008 work links disintegration of life meaning with crisis in personality development, explaining the focus on coherence, agency, and purposeful action. Steger's work supplies broader context for meaning in life as a psychological concern involving purpose and significance, but this online version is not presented as an adaptation or direct replication of it.

The questionnaire reports the displayed bands as result categories. Because this life meaning assessment relies on self-report, its result can vary with current stress, mood, recent transitions, and candor. It can highlight patterns for reflection, but it is not a diagnosis and should be interpreted alongside the person's wider circumstances.

Author: Michael F. Steger

Literature:

Karpinsky, K. V. (2019). Psychology of Meaning-in-Life Crisis. Grodno: Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno.
Karpinsky, K. V. (2008). Meaning-in-Life Crisis Questionnaire. Grodno: Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno.
Karpinsky, K. V. (2011). Disintegration of Life Meaning as a Prerequisite for Crisis in Personality Development. Human. Community. Management, 2011(2), 4-16.
Steger, M. F. (2009). Meaning in Life. In S. J. Lopez and C. R. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 679-688). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195187243.013.0064

Updated: 2025-10-02