Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
leadership

Inclusive Leadership Analysis Instrument Test

Take the online Inclusive Leadership Analysis Instrument Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Inclusive Leadership Analysis Instrument Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
See how inclusive your leadership really is in just 6 minutes. This 29-item check pinpoints strengths and gaps so you can build a clear plan to help every team member feel heard.
Start Online Test
Questions: 296 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
24,168 views
2,111 completions
1,722 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
2/3
Mentor–Mentee (MM)
Measures how consistently you use inclusive mentoring behaviors that support others’ growth while considering individual differences.
Developing
Consistent
01: Developing | 23: Consistent
A score of 2 suggests you generally provide inclusive mentoring support and often adapt your guidance to others’ individual needs, with some room to increase consistency.
example score
1/3
Team Member (TM)
Measures how consistently you show inclusive behaviors as a team member by supporting others and encouraging open exchange of ideas.
Low
High
01: Low | 23: High
A score of 1 suggests inclusive team-member behaviors are present at times but are not yet consistently expressed across situations.
example score
3/7
Team (Moderator) (T)
Measures how effectively you facilitate team processes to ensure all members have an equal opportunity to participate.
Developing
Emerging
Strong
02: Developing | 35: Emerging | 67: Strong
A score of 3 suggests you sometimes create inclusive conditions for participation, with room to more consistently draw in quieter or less-represented voices.
example score
2/7
Team (Leader) (T)
Measures how consistently you use inclusive behaviors as a team leader to engage all members and support diverse viewpoints.
Developing inclusion
Emerging inclusion
Strong inclusion
02: Developing inclusion | 35: Emerging inclusion | 67: Strong inclusion
A score of 2 suggests inclusive leadership behaviors are used infrequently, with significant opportunity to more actively engage quieter members and invite diverse perspectives.
example score
7/9
One-on-One (OoO)
Measures how consistently you use inclusive behaviors in one-to-one conversations by tailoring your approach to the other person’s unique needs and perspective.
Developing
Consistent
Strong
03: Developing | 46: Consistent | 79: Strong
A score of 7 indicates strong inclusivity in one-on-one interactions, suggesting you usually adapt your communication to the individual and actively make space for their input.
example score
17/29
Total Score (TS)
This scale measures your overall level of inclusive leadership behaviors in day-to-day interactions with team members.
High inclusiveness
Moderate inclusiveness
Needs strengthening
09: High inclusiveness | 1019: Moderate inclusiveness | 2029: Needs strengthening
A score of 17 falls in the Moderate inclusiveness range, suggesting you use several inclusive practices consistently while some behaviors may benefit from more deliberate focus.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

People Team Managers
41%OF USERS
Managers of cross-functional teams take it to see how consistently they create psychological safety, invite diverse input, and act on what they hear.
New and Aspiring Leads
34%OF USERS
First-time leaders use it to benchmark their inclusive habits early and get clear, practical next steps for day-to-day interactions.
HR and L&D Facilitators
25%OF USERS
HR, DEI, and training professionals use it in workshops or coaching to spark reflection and guide targeted development plans.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Mentor-Apprentice (M)
Mentor-Apprentice (M)
Average
1.1
Normal range
0.61.6
min.
0
max.
3
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Team (member) (T()
Team (member) (T()
Average
2.1
Normal range
1.62.6
min.
0
max.
3
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Team (Moderator) (T()
Team (Moderator) (T()
Average
2.7
Normal range
1.54
min.
0
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Team (leader) (T()
Team (leader) (T()
Average
2.2
Normal range
1.23.2
min.
0
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
One on One (OoO)
One on One (OoO)
Average
3.5
Normal range
2.24.7
min.
0
max.
9
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Overall score (Os)
Overall score (Os)
Average
9.8
Normal range
514.6
min.
0
max.
29
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Yes
    • No
    • Yes
    • No
    • Yes
    • No
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Inclusive Leadership Assessment Tool Test

Inclusive Leadership Analysis Instrument Test - Symptoms and Signs

leadership

This measure assesses self-reported inclusive leadership behaviors in everyday work interactions. The Inclusive Leadership Analysis Instrument is intended to help identify areas of relative strength and areas for development related to engaging and valuing diverse team members. David A. Waldman is cited as the author.

The questionnaire includes 29 items and typically takes about 6 minutes to complete. Respondents rate the frequency of specific behaviors (e.g., inviting input, fostering psychological safety, and ensuring participation from less-heard members), yielding an overview of current practices and potential targets for skill building. Results from the Inclusive Leadership Analysis Instrument may be used to support reflection, coaching, or leadership development planning in organizational settings.

Author: Bernard M. Bass, David A. Waldman
Literature: Northouse, P. G. Leadership: Theory and practice. SAGE Publications. 2021.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment