How Do You Feel at Work? Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Completely agree
- Almost agree
- Not quite agree
- Rather disagree
- Almost disagree
- Completely disagree
- Strongly agree
- Almost agree
- Not quite agree
- Rather disagree
- Nearly disagree
- Strongly disagree
- Completely agree
- Almost agree
- Not entirely agree
- Somewhat disagree
- Almost disagree
- Completely disagree
How Do You Feel at Work? Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to identify perceived satisfaction and workplace conditions can use the How Do You Feel at Work? Questionnaire Test as a structured starting point. It is intended for people reflecting on their own professional setting, especially relationships with supervisors and coworkers, organizational clarity, and everyday conditions that shape their experience. A workplace questionnaire like this can produce an overall result about the organizational environment.
What This Assessment Explores
It examines satisfaction with the organizational environment rather than a single mood. Items address responsibilities, demands, feedback, pay, working conditions, meaningful tasks, relationships, management, supervision, conflict, and the usefulness of work.
The result uses Satisfaction With the Organizational Environment (14-84). It measures satisfaction with the professional organizational environment: higher scores indicate well-being at work, while lower scores indicate dissatisfaction with working conditions and organizational arrangements. The bands are Dissatisfied / issues present (14-42) and Satisfied / positive attitude (43-84).
The main themes are:
- Work organization shows whether responsibilities and demands feel clear and manageable.
- Supervision and recognition show how evaluation, expectations, support, and appreciation are experienced.
- Conditions and relationships show whether work feels fair, useful, interesting, and socially workable.
As a work satisfaction test, it helps focus reflection on the conditions behind the result.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item presents a workplace statement with six ordered agreement options, from complete agreement to complete disagreement. The sample includes both favorable descriptions and statements about strain or restrictive management, presenting workplace experience from contrasting angles. The questionnaire produces one organizational-environment result, but the online format does not specify how the six options are converted into points or whether any items are reverse-scored.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Alexander Grachev's work on organizational environment, employee life orientations, and motivational potential, while the 2009 and 2020 publications extend that perspective. This online version is not identified as the published instrument or as a documented direct adaptation of that work.
Interpret the outcome as a snapshot of perceived working conditions. A result can show a generally positive or problematic orientation, but it cannot explain causes or identify a specific organizational remedy. Responses may shift with workload, recent events, expectations, and willingness to disclose dissatisfaction. Used as a work environment assessment, it is best read alongside context because the online questionnaire's standardization and interpretation procedures are not specified for this version.
- Grachev, Alexander A. (2008). Psychological Design of a Production Organization. St. Petersburg: Institute of Practical Psychology and Psychoanalysis.
- Grachev, Alexander A. (2009). Organizational Environment and Realization of Employee's Life Orientations. Psychological Journal, 30(3), 28-38.
- Grachev, Alexander A. (2020). Assessment and Design of the Motivational Potential of Work. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Organizational Psychology and Psychology of Labor, 5(2), 68-84. 10.38098/ipran.opwp.2020.15.2.003
Updated: