Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
psychotherapy

Working Alliance Inventory – Short Form (WAI-S) Test

Take the online Working Alliance Inventory – Short Form (WAI-S) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Working Alliance Inventory – Short Form (WAI-S) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
After three minutes and 11 questions, the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Form (WAI-S) Test offers a snapshot of how you and your therapist align on goals, tasks, trust, and understanding. The result can support focused reflection on the therapeutic relationship and help identify areas to discuss in therapy.
Questions: 113 minutes
Working Alliance Inventory – Short: agreement scale card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
29,074 views
2,225 completions
1,855 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,855 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Therapeutic AllianceTA
Assesses the quality of the client–therapist working relationship across agreement on goals, collaboration on tasks, and emotional bond.
example score25/77
25/77Low allianceexample score
11 – 33Low alliance
34 – 55Moderate alliance
56 – 77Strong alliance
A score of 25 falls in the Low alliance range, suggesting weaker agreement on goals/tasks or a less established bond at this time.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Practicing psychotherapists
44%OF USERS
Therapists use it to quickly check how aligned they are with a client on goals, tasks, and trust and to spot issues early.
Therapy clients
33%OF USERS
Clients take it to express how understood and supported they feel and whether the work in sessions matches their expectations.
Supervisors and clinic leads
23%OF USERS
Supervisors or team leads use it to monitor alliance quality across cases and guide corrective feedback or treatment planning.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Therapeutic Alliance ScaleTAS
You?
Average40
Typical rangeTypical29.7 – 50.3
Possible11 – 77
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

This questionnaire consists of a set of statements that describe, in various ways, thoughts and feelings that may arise in relation to a psychotherapist (counselor). When reading each statement, mentally insert the name of the therapist (counselor) in place of the underlined blank. Below each statement is a response scale with seven options. Respond quickly, without overthinking. Select the first response that comes to mind. The goal is to capture the initial reaction.
    • Never
    • Very rarely
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often
    • Always
    • Never
    • Very rarely
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often
    • Always
    • Never
    • Very rarely
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often
    • Always
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Working Alliance Inventory – Short Form (WAI-S) Test - Description and methodology of the test

psychotherapy

For people who want to understand how therapy is progressing, the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Form (WAI-S) Test focuses attention on the working relationship rather than symptoms alone. This working alliance inventory test can help a client reflect on whether therapist and client share a direction, understand the work similarly, and feel enough trust to engage productively. The result offers a focused starting point for discussion.

What This Assessment Explores

The questionnaire examines the alliance as a practical part of psychotherapy: whether therapist and client agree on goals, understand the tasks, and experience a supportive bond. It also touches on confidence in the therapist, mutual trust, insight, and agreement about what deserves attention. The WAI-S assessment captures the client's current experience of the therapy relationship, so its result describes perceived alignment in this phase of treatment.

These are the three dimensions reflected in the items:

  • Goal agreement shows whether both people are aligned about the changes therapy is meant to support.
  • Task agreement indicates whether session activities seem understandable, relevant, and appropriate.
  • Bond reflects trust, appreciation, understanding, and confidence within the relationship.

The Therapeutic Alliance scale runs from 11-77. Its bands are Low alliance (11-33), Moderate alliance (34-55), and Strong alliance (56-77), representing the overall quality of connection and alignment.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each statement asks how often a therapy experience is true, using seven ordered choices from Never to Always, including Very rarely, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, and Very often; one item uses equivalent Very seldom wording. The online result reflects overall alliance strength: higher scores indicate a stronger alliance, with agreement, trust, and collaboration contributing to that interpretation. The displayed bands describe the level represented by the result.

The online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the published Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form associated with Tracey and Kokotovic; it is presented as an online form, not as a separately validated adaptation or shortened version of that instrument. Bordin’s working-alliance model provides the theoretical basis, while Horvath and Greenberg reported the broader instrument’s development and validation. This therapeutic alliance questionnaire applies that framework as a structured self-report measure, while its meaning remains tied to the respondent’s perspective.

Current mood, recent sessions, expectations, and self-awareness may influence responses, so the result is best treated as focused reflection rather than a clinical diagnosis or standalone measure of treatment outcome.

Author: Adam O. Horvath, Leslie S. Greenberg
Literature:
  • Tracey, Terence J., & Kokotovic, Anna M. (1989). Factor Structure of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 1(3), 207–210. 10.1037/1040-3590.1.3.207
  • Horvath, Adam O., & Greenberg, Leslie S. (1989). Development and Validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(2), 223–233. 10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223
  • Bordin, Edward S. (1979). The Generalizability of the Psychoanalytic Concept of the Working Alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16(3), 252–260. 10.1037/h0085885

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment