Short Impulsivity Questionnaire (IMP-15) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Definitely yes
- Probably yes
- Probably not
- No, not always
- Definitely yes
- Probably yes
- Probably no
- Definitely no
- Definitely yes
- Probably yes
- Probably not
- Definitely not
Short Impulsivity Questionnaire (IMP-15) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People wondering why plans change, tasks remain unfinished, or reactions shift under pressure may use this impulsivity questionnaire to examine recurring patterns behind those moments. The Short Impulsivity Questionnaire (IMP-15) Test offers a concise profile rather than a judgment about character. Its result can help connect everyday choices with situations that make consistency difficult.
What This Assessment Measures
At its core, the assessment treats impulsivity as a trait contrasted with goal-directedness and persistence. Items address task completion, pressure, criticism, and interest after novelty fades. One result reflects how impulsive tendencies may appear in planning, emotional regulation, and self-evaluation.
The Impulsivity Index runs from 15-60: Low 15-30, Moderate 31-45, and High 46-60. Higher results indicate less stable interests and plans and lower self-control; lower results indicate perseverance and goal orientation. Through its index, the questionnaire functions as a self-control assessment of recurring tendencies.
The questions cover four themes within that one index:
- Task persistence shows how readily you finish an activity after starting it.
- Emotional control shows how impulsive tendencies may surface in responses to pressure or criticism.
- Interest stability shows whether novelty displaces an earlier task or plan.
- Self-definition shows how settled your views, abilities, and direction feel.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Responses use four ordered choices whose wording follows each statement: options can move from “definitely yes” to “no, not always,” or from “very often” to “almost never.” This captures degree or frequency rather than a simple yes/no.
Evidence is closest to the published Losenkov Imp-15, a short form connected with Losenkov’s 1979 account of impulsivity. Its framework contrasts poorly controlled shifts with persistence, self-regulation, and directed action. The online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that instrument; this version has not itself been validated in the study that evaluated it.
Scoring produces one composite result. Because the online format does not specify item weights or reverse-coding, readers should not infer how many points an answer contributes. Read the composite score as a summary of the tendencies represented across the items, not as an explanation for any single response.
Because it returns one self-report score, this impulsivity test summarizes a broad pattern rather than a cause; self-perception and current circumstances can shape that summary, so read it as structured reflection on the response pattern.
- Sheinov, V. P., & Dziavitsyn, A. S. (2022). Short Version of V. A. Losenkov’s Impulsivity Questionnaire: Development and Validation. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 19(4), 820-838. 10.22363/2313-1683-2022-19-4-820-838
- Losenkov, V. A. (1979). Impulsivity. In V. A. Yadov (Ed.), Self-Regulation and Prediction of Individual Social Behavior: A Dispositional Concept (pp. 230-232). Leningrad: Nauka Publishing House.