Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
attitude towards illness

Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) Test

Take the online Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
With eight questions and a typical completion time of two minutes, the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) Test helps you reflect on how you view your condition, including its impact, controllability, symptoms, emotional effects, and perceived threat. Your result can support clearer self-reflection about coping and treatment expectations.
Questions: 82 minutes
Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire: situation and reply bubbles
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
21,532 views
2,035 completions
1,771 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,771 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Perceived Illness and Treatment ControlPIaTC
Assesses how strongly a person believes they can understand and control their illness and that treatment can effectively manage it.
example score13/30
13/30Moderate controllabilityexample score
0 – 10Low controllability
11 – 20Moderate controllability
21 – 30High controllability
A score of 13 indicates a moderate sense of controllability, suggesting some confidence in understanding and managing the condition and its treatment, alongside notable uncertainty.
Perceived Life-Threatening Nature of IllnessPLTNoI
Measures how strongly a person perceives their illness as life-threatening, including perceived consequences, duration, symptoms, concern, and emotional impact.
example score27/50
27/50Moderate threatexample score
0 – 16Low threat
17 – 33Moderate threat
34 – 50High threat
A score of 27 falls in the Moderate threat range, suggesting a noticeable but not extreme sense of illness-related danger and emotional strain.
Overall Illness ThreatOIT
Measures the overall perceived threat and emotional burden associated with the illness as a cumulative indicator.
example score54/80
54/80High threatexample score
0 – 26Low threat
27 – 53Moderate threat
54 – 80High threat
A score of 54 falls in the High threat range, suggesting a heightened perception of danger and worry related to the illness.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

People with chronic conditions
44%OF USERS
They take it to understand how their illness affects daily life, emotions, and sense of control.
Patients starting new treatment
31%OF USERS
They use it to quickly gauge worry, perceived threat, and expectations before or during a change in care.
Researchers and clinicians
25%OF USERS
They administer it as a fast snapshot of illness perceptions to guide support and track outcomes over time.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Perceived controllability of the illness and treatmentPcotiat
You?
Average18
Typical rangeTypical14.3 – 21.8
Possible0 – 30
Perception of Life-Threatening IllnessPoLI
You?
Average27.9
Typical rangeTypical21.7 – 34.2
Possible0 – 50
Overall Disease Threat LevelODTL
You?
Average23.1
Typical rangeTypical8.2 – 38
Possible0 – 80
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • 0: does not affect my life at all
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
    • 9
    • 10: affects my life extremely
    • 0: a very short time
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
    • 9
    • 10: forever
    • 0: I have absolutely no control
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
    • 9
    • 10: I have complete control
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) Test - Description and methodology of the test

attitude towards illness

People living with a health condition, or trying to understand their reactions to one, may use an illness perception questionnaire to organize thoughts about symptoms, consequences, control, and emotional impact. The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) Test offers a structured snapshot of these beliefs, helping respondents see whether their current view is centred more on manageability or perceived threat.

What This Assessment Explores

These questions examine the personal model of illness: what it changes, how long it may last, how symptoms feel, and how strongly it affects emotions. Control, treatment expectations, understanding, concern, and danger remain related but distinct appraisals.

For someone considering a BIPQ test, the result separates confidence in management from perceived threat. The three displayed dimensions are:

  • Perceived Illness and Treatment Control (0–30) shows confidence that the condition can be managed, treatment can help, and its course can be understood; Low controllability 0–10, Moderate controllability 11–20, High controllability 21–30.
  • Perceived Life-Threatening Nature of Illness (0–50) reflects perceived life threat, including consequences, timeline, identity, concern, and emotional response; Low threat 0–16, Moderate threat 17–33, High threat 34–50.
  • Overall Illness Threat (0–80) summarizes perceived illness-related danger, concern, and anxiety; Low threat 0–26, Moderate threat 27–53, High threat 54–80.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Every prompt uses a 0–10 response line with verbal anchors at both ends. The eight topics cover consequences, timeline, control, treatment, symptoms, concern, understanding, and emotional response, capturing both cognitive judgments and feelings.

The result reports the three displayed scores and their bands; each band describes current appraisal rather than medical severity. The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Brief IPQ (Broadbent et al., 2006), while the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (Leventhal, Phillips, and Burns, 2016) explains how illness beliefs and emotions can shape self-management.

Broadbent et al. (2015) reviewed the Brief IPQ across health contexts. The revised instrument (Moss-Morris et al., 2002) provides related background, but this online presentation should not be assumed to have identical reliability, norms, or validity to every published version.

As an illness perception test, it is a snapshot that may shift with symptoms, information, treatment, and support. Self-report also leaves scores open to current distress, recall, and response style; they do not determine prognosis or establish a diagnosis.

Author: Elaine A. Wethington, Howard Leventhal
Literature:
  • Broadbent, E., Petrie, K. J., Main, J., & Weinman, J. (2006). The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 60(6), 631–637. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020
  • Broadbent, E., Wilkes, C., Koschwanez, H., Weinman, J., Norton, S., & Petrie, K. J. (2015). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. Psychology & Health, 30(11), 1361–1385. 10.1080/08870446.2015.1070851
  • Moss-Morris, R., Weinman, J., Petrie, K. J., Horne, R., Cameron, L. D., & Buick, D. (2002). The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychology and Health, 17(1), 1–16. 10.1080/08870440290001494
  • Leventhal, H., Phillips, L. A., & Burns, E. (2016). The Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM): A dynamic framework for understanding illness self-management. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 39(6), 935–946. 10.1007/s10865-016-9782-2

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment