Religious Activity Assessment Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Never
- Once (one time)
- Sometimes
- Very often
- Never
- Once (one time)
- Sometimes
- Very often
- Never
- Once (one time)
- Sometimes
- Very often
Religious Activity Assessment Test - Description and methodology of the test
For people examining how faith operates in daily life, this assessment offers a structured way to reflect on practice, conviction, motivation, and spiritual experience. The Religious Activity Assessment Test is useful for respondents curious about their relationship with worship, divine belief, transcendence, or scientific explanations. A religious activity questionnaire can reveal how these aspects coexist without reducing the result to one label.
What This Assessment Measures
Religious behavior assessment maps faith.
Dimensions:
- Religious Behaviors (0-10) measures practice: Low practice (0-3), Moderate practice (4-7), High practice (8-10); Religious vs. Natural Science Worldview (0-10) shows worldview: Natural-scientific lean (0-4), Mixed / balanced (5-7), Religious (theistic) lean (8-10); Intrinsic and Extrinsic Religious Motivation Scale (0-10): External-leaning (0-3), Mixed motivation (4-7), Internal-leaning (8-10).
- Prereligious Experiences (0-10) measures transcendence: Low (0-3), Moderate (4-7), High (8-10); Sthenic (0-10): Low (0-4), Moderate (5-7), High (8-10).
- Asthenic Experiences (0-10) measures guilt and shame: Low (0-3), Moderate (4-7), High (8-10); Overall Religious Experience (0-10) summarizes experience: Limited (0-4), Moderate (5-7), Diverse (8-10); Religious Activity Scale (0-10) summarizes religiosity: Low (0-3), Moderate (4-7), High (8-10).
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Responses use frequency choices from Never to Very often, paired A/B statements with graded preference, and ordered behavior options such as Regularly, Irregularly, Sometimes, and Never. A religious experience questionnaire covers both recurring conduct and personal interpretations of belief.
Scores combine component and composite results on 0-10 scales. Because no response-by-response point key is stated, the profile should be read as the calculated result rather than reconstructed manually.
Conceptually, the questionnaire is consistent with Methods of Investigation of Religious Activity (MIRA), the standardized psychometric methodology described by D. O. Smirnov in 1999, but it is not an adaptation of that method. Smirnov’s 2001 work examines religious activity within integral individuality, while Koteneva, Berezina, and Rybtsov’s 2021 study examines related religiosity and spirituality indicators. These sources situate the constructs but do not validate this online version.
Interpretation is personal and contextual. Memory, social desirability, self-awareness, and current circumstances can affect self-report, and the standardized source method does not automatically provide norms for this questionnaire. Treat the profile as a description of tendencies, not a clinical classification.
- Smirnov, D. O. (1999). Description of Procedure of the Psychometric Methodology “Questionnaire of Religious Activity” Standardization. Scientific Psychological Journal, 1-2, 159-172.
- Smirnov, D. O. (2001). Religious Activity in the Structure of Integral Individuality. Extended abstract of a candidate dissertation in psychology, Perm State Pedagogical University, Perm, 20 pp.
- Koteneva, A. V., Berezina, T. N., & Rybtsov, S. A. (2021). Religiosity, Spirituality and Biopsychological Age of Professionals in Russia. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(4), 1221-1238. 10.3390/ejihpe11040089
Updated: