Manager and Transformations Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- True
- False
- True
- False
- True
- False
Manager and Transformations Test - Description and methodology of the test
Managers, team leaders, and learners who want to examine how change is handled can use the Manager and Transformations Test to reflect on practical decisions around communication, participation, planning, and resistance. It is especially useful for someone reviewing their organizational change management skills before leading a reorganization or comparing current understanding with a structured framework. The result describes knowledge and competence in implementing transformations, not personal worth.
What This Assessment Explores
The questions examine how managers diagnose situations, explain decisions, involve staff, handle resistance, and balance technical planning with human concerns. It examines the skills involved in managing organizational transformations, focusing on whether reforms are communicated, paced, and supported in ways that encourage cooperation.
The result is organized around two scales:
- Number of Correct Answers (0-80) indicates knowledge of effective approaches to organizational change. Higher values reflect greater accurate knowledge and understanding. Bands: Limited knowledge (0-39), Solid knowledge (40-59), Advanced knowledge (60-80).
- Standard Score (5-95) reflects competence in implementing transformations. Higher values indicate greater effectiveness relative to a large manager sample. Bands: Low (5-25), Moderate (26-74), High (75-95).
Together, they separate accurate knowledge from the broader competence profile, helping the respondent identify recognized practices and development priorities.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each statement presents a claim about organizational change and requires a True-or-False judgment. Themes include diagnosis, communication, participation, resistance, planning, timing, productivity, and technical-human balance. This format checks management principles rather than a personal narrative.
Scoring displays an accuracy count for knowledge of effective approaches to organizational change. A second score reflects competence in implementing transformations and is derived by comparison with a large sample of managers. Together, the results from this true-or-false assessment distinguish knowledge from a manager’s competence in implementing transformations without establishing clinical status.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Reddin’s managerial-effectiveness framework. That conceptual relationship does not make Reddin the author or validator of this online test.
Interpret the profile alongside experience, current context, and honest self-report: knowing recommended practices may not ensure behavior under pressure, and true-or-false answers can be shaped by uncertainty or social desirability. Use the result to select areas for reflection and development.
- Reddin, William J. Tests for Managers. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix, 1997. 288 pp. ISBN 5-222-00083-4.
- Reddin, William J. Tests for the Output Oriented Manager: A Self-Assessment Guide. London: Kogan Page, 1990. ISBN 0-7494-0250-4.
- Reddin, William J. Managerial Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970. ISBN 0-07-051358-9.
- Cruz-Martínez, Luz María, Alejandro Serralde Solórzano, and Lucía Rivera. Psychometric Analysis of Reddin's Managerial Effectiveness Diagnosis. Acta de Investigación Psicológica, 5(3), 2015, 2211-2223. 10.1016/S2007-4719(16)30011-4
Updated: