Investment Attitudes Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Not sure / neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Not sure / neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Completely agree
Investment Attitudes Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
For readers reflecting on money, risk, and long-term financial choices, the Investment Attitudes Questionnaire Test offers a structured way to examine beliefs that may influence investing. As an investment questionnaire, it is suitable for people who are new to investing as well as those with experience. The result highlights patterns in confidence, perceived opportunity, uncertainty, and willingness to commit money over time.
What This Assessment Explores
This investor attitude test examines whether investing feels accessible or threatening. Items address confidence, capacity, opportunity, and preferences for spending or growth. Results indicate investment inclination.
These dimensions are:
- Propensity to Invest (1-7) measures readiness, interest, and long-term orientation; higher scores are associated with greater investment activity and willingness to take risks when knowledge and analysis are adequate. Bands: Low inclination 1-3.7, Moderate inclination 3.8-5.9, High inclination 6-7.
- Investment Pessimism (1-7) measures perceived financial capacity and context; higher scores suggest preferring to hold or spend rather than invest. Bands: Low pessimism 1-3.3, Moderate pessimism 3.4-5.8, High pessimism 5.9-7.
- Investment Anxiety (1-7) measures low confidence, fear, and complexity; higher scores suggest risk aversion and reluctance to engage with information. Bands: Low anxiety 1-3, Moderate anxiety 3.1-6, High anxiety 6.1-7.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Responses use seven-point options from strong disagreement to strong agreement, with a neutral or unsure midpoint. Statements cover confidence, complexity, fear, uncertainty, available money, timing, returns, and spending or growth preferences. This self-report investment-attitudes questionnaire records viewpoints, not observed financial decisions.
The questionnaire reports results across three dimensions. Their displayed ranges and bands show how results are grouped; they do not reveal how many points an answer contributes, so reverse-scoring and weighting should not be inferred.
Evidence is closest to Investment Attitudes Questionnaire (Boyarkin & Deyneka, 2023), whose focus on investment attitudes is conceptually consistent with this questionnaire without making it a direct adaptation. Grable and Lytton’s instrument offers related context for the risk-taking items, not evidence that this questionnaire measures financial risk tolerance; Kahneman, Slovic, and Tversky’s framework explains how judgment under uncertainty and bias can shape beliefs. The online questionnaire has no established population norms or documented standardization sample. Self-report may vary with current finances, knowledge, confidence, and response style; results are descriptive and best read alongside personal circumstances and actual financial behavior.
- Boyarkin, K. E., & Deyneka, O. S. (2023). Results of the Development of a Methodology for Studying Investment Attitudes. Social and Economic Psychology, 8(2)(30), 165-186.
- Grable, J., & Lytton, R. H. (1999). Financial Risk Tolerance Revisited: The Development of a Risk Assessment Instrument. Financial Services Review, 8(3), 163-181. 10.1016/S1057-0810(99)00041-4
- Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511809477
Updated: