Cultural Trends Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Very weak tendency
- Weak tendency
- Moderate tendency
- Strong tendency
- Very strong tendency
- Very low degree to which this is carried out
- Low degree to which this is carried out
- Moderate degree to which this is carried out
- High degree to which this is carried out
- Very high degree to which this is carried out
- Very weak tendency
- Weak tendency
- Moderate tendency
- Strong tendency
- Very strong tendency
Cultural Trends Test - Description and methodology of the test
People deciding whether to examine the fit between personal ideals and conduct may find the Cultural Trends Test useful. It suits readers who want to compare what they value with recurring choices and habits before deciding which tendencies deserve closer attention. A cultural trends assessment offers a structured starting point for that comparison.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire compares cultural and acultural tendencies in health, self-regulation, communication, creativity, aesthetics, and morality; a cultural values assessment links orientation with expression and strength.
These dimensions are:
- Predominance of Cultural Over Acultural Manifestations (0-9) and Predominance of Cultural Over Acultural Tendencies (0-9) compare cultural direction across Acultural, Mixed / balanced, and Cultural bands.
- Harmony of Cultural Trend Expression (1-5) and Balance of Cultural Trend Strength (1-5) show congruence and equilibrium across Low, Moderate, and High harmony bands.
- Harmonizing (Expression) (1-5), Cultural-Physical (Implementation) (1-5), Cultural and Psychological (Expression) (1-5), Creative (Implementation) (1-5), Aesthetic (Expression) (1-5), and Moral (Behavioral Expression) (1-5) cover enacted qualities.
- Harmonizing (1-5), Cultural-Physical (1-5), Cultural and Psychological (1-5), Creative (1-5), Aesthetic (1-5), and Moral (1-5) cover underlying orientations.
- Inconsistency Index (-4-4) reflects expression gaps through Low contradiction, Balanced, and Elevated contradiction bands.
Methodology and Evidence Base
The questions shown use five ordered response choices, while prompts vary: some ask about a tendency, others about enactment, implementation, follow-through, or behavioral expression. This wording distinguishes an inclination from how fully it enters daily life.
Results are reported across multiple scales with ranges of 0-9, 1-5, and -4-4. The Inconsistency Index compares average trend strength with everyday expression; its discrepancy may signal a development opportunity or inner conflict. The bands are descriptive classifications, not a diagnosis.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Motkov’s 1998 Culturological Tendencies formulation and with the framework discussed by Ivanov et al. (2014) and Mokaeva et al. (2019). It is not claimed to be a direct adaptation or validation of those publications.
Read alongside the situations that shaped the answers, a cultural trends profile is most useful for understanding the response pattern. Scores have no established population norms and may vary with self-perception and current context, so they do not provide a fixed psychological conclusion.
- Motkov, Oleg Ivanovich. Culturological Tendencies: Methodology. Moscow, 1998-2013.
- Ivanov, Sergey A., Mikhail A. Frantsuzov, Anastasia V. Izmailova, and Oleg S. Ilyin. Development of Students’ Psychological Culture Through Active Social-Psychological Training Methods. In Psychological Culture in the Educational Space: Proceedings of the 10th All-Russian Student Olympiad on Psychological and Pedagogical Education. Yekaterinburg, 2014, pp. 63-68.
- Motkov, Oleg Ivanovich. Nature of Personality: Essence, Structure, and Development. Moscow: Voskresensk Printing House, 2007. 248 pp.
- Mokaeva, M. A., A. V. Kerzhentseva, F. V. Musukaeva, G. V. Raitskaya, and S. K. Tivikova. Modernizing Psychological And Pedagogical Culture Of Participants Of Educational Process. In Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Modern Globalism, vol. 58, pp. 2344-2350. Future Academy, 2019. DOI 10.15405/epsbs.2019.03.02.270
Updated: