Self-Esteem Questionnaire Test

In five minutes, 24 questions in the Self-Esteem Questionnaire Test explore how you relate to yourself, your abilities, feelings, boundaries, and relationships. Your result highlights patterns in self-confidence, self-acceptance, communication, and personal influence, offering a practical starting point for reflection and understanding your overall profile.

Questions: 245 minutes

Self-Esteem Questionnaire Test: test ticket with numbers

October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published

26,779 views

2,951 completion

2,593 likes

Daniel Hall Psychologist · Test reviewer

2,593 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

ConsistencyC

Measures how consistently you maintain stable self-esteem and steady behavior when facing stress or change.

example score15/24

15/24Developing Consistencyexample score

6 – 12Needs More Stability

13 – 18Developing Consistency

19 – 24Strong Consistency

A score of 15 falls in the Developing Consistency range, suggesting generally steady self-regard with some variability under pressure.

Ability to InfluenceAtI

Measures how effectively you can influence situations and other people to shape outcomes in your life.

example score10/24

10/24Low influenceexample score

6 – 11Low influence

12 – 18Moderate influence

19 – 24High influence

A score of 10 falls in the Low influence range, suggesting you may feel less able to direct situations or impact others consistently.

Ability to Accept OneselfAtAO

Measures how well you acknowledge, respect, and accept yourself, including your feelings and differences from others.

example score15/24

15/24Moderate self-acceptanceexample score

6 – 12Low self-acceptance

13 – 18Moderate self-acceptance

19 – 24High self-acceptance

A score of 15 indicates a moderate level of self-acceptance, suggesting a generally respectful view of yourself with some areas that may feel harder to embrace consistently.

Ability to Establish ContactAtEC

Measures how easily and effectively a person initiates and maintains rapport in interactions with themselves and others.

example score16/24

16/24Adequateexample score

6 – 12Developing

13 – 18Adequate

19 – 24Strong

A score of 16 falls in the Adequate range, suggesting generally effective rapport-building with occasional situations where initiating or sustaining contact may feel less natural.

Self-EsteemSE

Measures overall self-esteem, reflecting how positively and confidently a person evaluates themselves and their abilities across life areas.

example score33/96

33/96Lowexample score

24 – 48Low

49 – 72Moderate

73 – 96High

A score of 33 falls in the Low range, suggesting a more self-critical or uncertain self-view in several areas of life.

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Relationship boundary seekers

41%OF USERS

People who feel stuck in unhealthy relationship patterns and want a quick read on how their self-worth affects boundaries and closeness.

Self-doubt and confidence builders

34%OF USERS

Those who often criticize themselves or feel not good enough and want to understand their self-acceptance and stability.

Personal growth and therapy starters

25%OF USERS

People beginning counseling or a self-improvement phase who want a clear baseline across relationships, influence, and consistency.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.

Shaded area — where most people score

Dot — the average

You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test

The Art of ConsistencyTAoC

You?

Average10.7

Typical rangeTypical8.5 – 12.9

Possible6 – 24

The Ability to InfluenceTAtI

You?

Average16.7

Typical rangeTypical13.8 – 19.6

Possible6 – 24

The Art of Accepting YourselfTAoAY

You?

Average12

Typical rangeTypical8.7 – 15.2

Possible6 – 24

The Ability to Establish RapportTAtER

You?

Average17.9

Typical rangeTypical15.1 – 20.7

Possible6 – 24

Self-Esteem ScaleSS

You?

Average52

Typical rangeTypical38.7 – 65.2

Possible24 – 96

Featured On

SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

- I can hardly do this.
- Sometimes I can do this, but I still very much need to develop my ability in situations like this.
- I can do this fairly often, but I feel I could improve in this area.
- I can do this often and am satisfied with it.
- I can hardly do this.
- Sometimes I can do this, but I still very much need to develop my ability in situations like this.
- I can do this quite often, but I feel I could improve in this area.
- I can do this often and I am satisfied with it.
- I can hardly do this.
- Sometimes I can do this, but I still very much need to develop my skills in situations like this.
- I can do this fairly often, but I feel I could improve in this area.
- I can do this often and am satisfied with it.

These are 3 of the 24 real questions — the rest appear in the test. No sign-up needed to start.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Self-Esteem Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test

self-esteem

self-acceptance

Readers who want to examine confidence, feelings, and relationships can use the Self-Esteem Questionnaire Test as a structured self-reflection exercise. It is intended for readers considering everyday confidence, boundaries, communication, and personal agency. This self-esteem assessment offers a multidimensional picture of self-regard, showing which patterns appear steadier and which may deserve further reflection.

What This Assessment Explores

Rather than reducing self-worth to one feeling, the profile examines self-regard in relationships, decisions, emotional awareness, boundaries, and setbacks. Its five displayed dimensions form a self-esteem profile:

Consistency (6-24) measures stable self-regard in difficulty: Needs More Stability 6-12; Developing Consistency 13-18; Strong Consistency 19-24.
Ability to Influence (6-24) reflects perceived control and leadership: Low influence 6-11; Moderate influence 12-18; High influence 19-24.
Ability to Accept Oneself (6-24) reflects respect for personal traits, feelings, and differences: Low self-acceptance 6-12; Moderate self-acceptance 13-18; High self-acceptance 19-24.
Ability to Establish Contact (6-24) reflects effective interaction with self and others: Developing 6-12; Adequate 13-18; Strong 19-24.
Self-Esteem (24-96) summarizes self-attitudes and confidence: Low 24-48; Moderate 49-72; High 73-96.

Together, these dimensions show where self-regard is steady, developing, or more difficult to access.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each statement uses a four-point self-report format, moving from hardly being able to do something to doing it often and feeling satisfied. Middle choices describe occasional or fairly frequent ability with room for improvement, so respondents rate perceived functioning rather than simple agreement.

The questionnaire reports a score for each displayed dimension and an overall Self-Esteem score. These self-esteem results indicate more of the relevant tendency at higher scores within the stated bands, rather than defining a fixed personality type.

The content is conceptually consistent with the Weinhold Self-Esteem Questionnaire, which connects self-regard with agency, boundaries, emotional expression, and contact with others. Kolenova and colleagues (2024) used the Weinhold and Weinhold measure alongside other tools in a study of women with codependency-related patterns. This was a related application of the published Weinhold measure, not a validation of this online version.

The online version presents descriptive score bands rather than established population norms, reliability estimates, or diagnostic cutoffs, and its scores should not be treated as a validated equivalent of the source instrument. Self-awareness, honesty, and current circumstances can also shape answers.

Author: Morris Rosenberg

Literature:

Weinhold, Barry K., and Janae B. Weinhold. Breaking Free of the Co-Dependency Trap. Stillpoint, 1989.
Kolenova, Anastasya S., Anna M. Kukulyar, Ekaterina G. Denisova, and Pavel N. Ermakov. “Self-Attitude and Reflection in Codependent Women: A Comparative Study.” Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 17(1), 116-132, 2024. DOI 10.11621/pir.2024.0107

Updated: 2025-10-02