Professional Self-Attitude Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Completely untrue
- Probably untrue
- Probably true
- Completely true
- Completely untrue
- Probably untrue
- Probably true
- Completely true
- Completely untrue
- Probably untrue
- Probably true
- Completely true
Professional Self-Attitude Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
People reassessing a role, facing a career decision, or trying to understand persistent work-related reactions can use the Professional Self-Attitude Questionnaire Test to examine how they view themselves at work. The questions offer a structured pause when professional experiences feel confusing, discouraging, or difficult to interpret. As a professional self-assessment questionnaire, it gives respondents a language for reflecting on their relationship with work.
What This Assessment Explores
At its core, the questionnaire examines how a person evaluates the self at work: competence, fit, responsibility, growth, confidence, and reactions to difficulty. The statements move between affirming and troubling situations, including feeling suited to a profession, handling demanding tasks, trusting one’s qualities, regretting a career choice, and blaming oneself for setbacks. Viewed as a professional self-attitude profile, the result presents a pattern of self-evaluations in the professional domain rather than a single label.
A result is a profile rather than a single verdict. Confidence may coexist with self-blame, while attachment to a professional self-image may limit openness to change. Read together, the dimensions can help respondents consider how dissatisfaction relates to perceived capability, occupational demands, and professional development. This makes the assessment relevant to people reflecting on work or career change.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Four choices range from completely untrue to completely true. Karpinski and Kolyshko (2010) provide a conceptual comparison; this is not their instrument or a documented adaptation, and their findings do not validate it.
The result dimensions are:
- Professional Self-Deprecation, Professional Self-Efficacy, Internal Conflict, and Professional Self-Respect each run 0-9: Low 0-3, Moderate 4-6, High 7-9. They cover devaluation, efficacy, mismatch, and satisfaction.
- Self-Rated Personal Growth, Professional Self-Leadership, and Professional Self-Blame each run 0-9: Low growth value/Low self-guidance/Low self-blame 0-3; Moderate growth value/Moderate self-guidance/Moderate self-blame 4-6; High growth value/High self-guidance/High self-blame 7-9. They cover growth, guidance, and self-criticism.
- Professional Self-Attachment, Professional Self-Confidence, and Overall Professional Self-Attitude Positivity each run 0-9: Growth-oriented/Low confidence/Low positivity 0-3; Balanced/Moderate confidence/Moderate positivity 4-6; Highly self-attached/High confidence/High positivity 7-9. They cover self-esteem, competence, and positivity; higher attachment may suggest complacency, while lower attachment may reflect growth.
Displayed bands are defined; scoring rules, weighting, reverse scoring, norms, and standardization are unstated. As a professional self-attitude assessment, self-reports may shift with current work stress, self-awareness, or impression management.
- Karpinski, K. V., & Kolyshko, A. M. (2010). Professional Self-Attitude of the Individual and Methods of Its Psychological Diagnosis. Grodno: Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno, 140 pp.
- Karpinski, K. V., & Kolyshko, A. M. (2010). Professional Self-Attitude of Personality: Theoretical Approaches and Methods of Diagnostics. Psychological Diagnostics, 2010(3), 4-124.
- Kolyshko, A. M., & Karpinski, K. V. (2022). Concept and Questionnaire of Professional Self-Attitude: New Empirical and Psychometric Results. Vesnik of the Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno. Series 3: Philology, Pedagogy, Psychology, 12(3), 150-162.
- Gerasimova, A. S., & Oboznov, A. (2019). Peculiarities of Psychological Well-Being of the Individual Heads of Structural Divisions of the University. Research Result. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 5(1), 70-85. 10.18413/2313-8971-2019-5-1-0-6
Updated: