Home1
Psychological tests2
Leadership Effectiveness Scale3

Leadership Effectiveness Scale Test

Understand the behavior patterns that drive your leadership impact in about 11 minutes. Get clear strengths and growth areas to refine your style and improve results.

Start Online Test

Questions: 6011 minutes

08:30

October 2, 2025

October 2, 2025
Material has been updated

October 2, 2025
Material has been published

24,014 views

1,576 completions

1,281 likes

Verified by Daniel Hall

Psychologist with 25 years of experience

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score

8/20

Ineffective Leadership (IL)

Measures the extent of managerial mistakes and ineffective organization or team-interaction behaviors that can reduce leadership effectiveness.

Low risk

Moderate risk

High risk

0 – 6: Low risk | 7 – 14: Moderate risk | 15 – 20: High risk

A score of 8 falls in the Moderate risk range, suggesting some ineffective leadership patterns are present and may occasionally hinder team coordination and results.

example score

21/40

Effective Leadership (EL)

Measures a leader’s effectiveness in achieving goals, motivating employees, and sustaining a productive team environment.

Needs development

Developing

Strong

0 – 15: Needs development | 16 – 30: Developing | 31 – 40: Strong

A score of 21 falls in the Developing range, suggesting emerging leadership strengths with clear opportunities to build more consistent goal-setting, motivation, and team management behaviors.

Start Online Test

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

People Managers

46%OF USERS

Current team leads and managers use it to spot leadership habits that help or hinder day-to-day effectiveness.

Senior Leaders

31%OF USERS

Department heads and executives take it to reflect on their leadership style and fine-tune how they influence others.

Aspiring Leaders

23%OF USERS

High-potential employees and students preparing for management roles use it to understand their emerging leadership tendencies.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.

Ineffective Leadership (IL)

Average

6.4

Normal range

3.4 — 9.5

min.

max.

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Effective Leadership (EL)

Average

15.4

Normal range

9.7 — 21.1

min.

max.

This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.

Start Online Test

Featured On

SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No

These are 3 of the 60 real questions — the rest appear in the test. No sign-up needed to start.

Start Online Test

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

About This Assessment

Leadership Effectiveness Scale Test - Symptoms and Signs

business

The measure is designed to support evaluation of leadership-related behavioral tendencies relevant to effectiveness. Leadership Effectiveness Scale provides a structured self-report format for reflecting on common patterns that may facilitate or hinder performance in supervisory or managerial roles.

The instrument consists of 60 items and typically requires about 11 minutes to complete. It can be used in organizational, coaching, or training contexts to help identify perceived strengths and areas for development, and to inform discussion of leadership style and skill-building targets.

Authorship is listed as Author not specified. Results from the Leadership Effectiveness Scale should be interpreted within the broader clinical or organizational context and integrated with collateral information when used for decision-making.

Author: Author not specified

Literature: Yukl, G. Leadership in organizations. Prentice Hall. 1998.