Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
sense of humor

Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ) Test

Take the online Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
In about six minutes, you can complete the Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ) Test, which uses 32 statements to explore how you use humor with yourself and others. Your result outlines patterns linked to coping, social connection, and self-reflection, offering a concise profile of your everyday responses.
Questions: 326 minutes
Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ) Test: agreement scale card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
30,713 views
3,460 completions
2,939 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,939 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Self-Defeating HumorSDH
Measures how often a person uses self-deprecating jokes to gain others’ approval, sometimes at the expense of self-respect.
example score26/56
26/56Moderateexample score
8 – 18Low
19 – 39Moderate
40 – 56High
A score of 26 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting you sometimes use self-deprecating humor to fit in or ease social situations, but it is not a dominant style.
Aggressive HumorAH
Measures how often a person uses sarcasm, ridicule, or teasing that can assert dominance or manipulate others in social interactions.
example score26/56
26/56Moderateexample score
8 – 23Low
24 – 42Moderate
43 – 56High
A score of 26 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting occasional use of sarcastic or teasing humor that may sometimes be felt as sharp or confrontational by others.
Self-Enhancing HumorSEH
Measures how often a person uses humor to stay optimistic and regulate emotions when facing stress or difficulties.
example score29/56
29/56Moderateexample score
8 – 25Low
26 – 44Moderate
45 – 56High
A score of 29 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting you sometimes use humor to maintain a positive outlook and cope with stress, though it may not be your most consistent strategy.
Affiliative HumorAH
Measures how often a person uses warm, inclusive humor to build rapport, ease social interaction, and strengthen relationships.
example score26/56
26/56Lowexample score
8 – 28Low
29 – 46Moderate
47 – 56High
A score of 26 falls in the Low range, suggesting affiliative humor is used less frequently than average for creating a friendly, bonding atmosphere.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Relationship and communication improvers
41%OF USERS
People who want to understand how their jokes affect closeness, conflict, and everyday conversations with partners, friends, or family.
Stress coping and resilience seekers
34%OF USERS
Those using humor to get through tough periods and who want to see whether their style supports well-being or masks problems.
Psychologists, coaches, and trainers
25%OF USERS
Professionals who use the results to tailor counseling, team training, or personal development work around adaptive and risky humor habits.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Self-deprecating humorSh
You?
Average43.4
Typical rangeTypical36.5 – 50.3
Possible8 – 56
Aggressive humorAh
You?
Average38.2
Typical rangeTypical31.8 – 44.7
Possible8 – 56
Self-Supporting HumorSH
You?
Average41.5
Typical rangeTypical34.7 – 48.4
Possible8 – 56
Affiliative humorAh
You?
Average35.8
Typical rangeTypical27.6 – 44.1
Possible8 – 56
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

People express and perceive humor in different ways. Below is a list of statements describing various ways of expressing humor. Please read each statement carefully and indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with it using a seven-point scale.
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Slightly disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Slightly agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ) Test - Description and methodology of the test

sense of humor
communication style

People who want to understand how humor operates in relationships, self-talk, and difficult moments can use this self-report profile for focused reflection. The Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ) Test describes recurring tendencies rather than fixed personality judgments. As a humor style assessment, it helps readers consider whether their humor supports connection, eases stress, involves seeking approval through self-directed humor, or creates interpersonal strain.

What This Assessment Explores

Across social situations and difficult moods, the items examine humor as interpersonal behavior and as a response to discomfort. They cover joking, self-directed criticism, teasing, sensitivity to offense, and finding amusement while upset. This humor style questionnaire offers a structured profile of everyday tendencies rather than a complete personality description.

The four displayed dimensions are:

  • Self-Defeating Humor (8-56) measures self-directed joking for approval; Low 8-18, Moderate 19-39, High 40-56.
  • Aggressive Humor (8-56) measures sarcasm, ridicule, or teasing that may strain relationships; Low 8-23, Moderate 24-42, High 43-56.
  • Self-Enhancing Humor (8-56) measures optimism and humor-based coping with stress; Low 8-25, Moderate 26-44, High 45-56.
  • Affiliative Humor (8-56) measures warm, tolerant joking that supports connection; Low 8-28, Moderate 29-46, High 47-56.

Different levels reflect tendencies toward approval-seeking self-directed humor, potentially hurtful humor, stress-coping humor, and relationship-enhancing humor.

Methodology and Evidence Base

A seven-point agreement format runs from strongly disagree to strongly agree, with a neutral midpoint. Items address social joking, self-criticism used for amusement, concern about offending others, and finding humor during low or stressful moods. Together, they examine humor’s function rather than simply perceived funniness.

Displayed scoring combines responses into four dimension scores. The displayed bands are descriptive categories for the scores reported here. Together, the four scores summarize how strongly the respondent endorses the corresponding humor tendencies.

The relevant published framework is the Humor Styles Questionnaire (Martin et al., 2003), and this questionnaire is conceptually consistent with it rather than a direct adaptation. Ruch and Heintz (2016) examined a German version, and their 2017 experimental study reported limited construct and criterion validity. Those studies concern the published HSQ and a German version, not this online humor questionnaire.

Current mood, memory, self-awareness, and the wish to appear considerate can shift self-reports. Read the result as a structured snapshot of reported tendencies, alongside the situations and relationships behind particular answers.

Author: Rod A. Martin
Literature:
  • Martin, Rod A., Patricia Puhlik-Doris, Gwen Larsen, Jeanette Gray, and Kelly Weir. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48-75. 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2
  • Ruch, Willibald, and Sonja Heintz. (2016). The German Version of the Humor Styles Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties and Overlap With Other Styles of Humor. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 12(3), 434-455. 10.5964/ejop.v12i3.1116
  • Ruch, Willibald, and Sonja Heintz. (2017). Experimentally Manipulating Items Informs on the (Limited) Construct and Criterion Validity of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 616. 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00616

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment