Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly

Diane Poole Heller Attachment Quiz

Diane Poole Heller Attachment Quiz - FreudlyTake a free diane poole heller attachment quiz to discover your attachment style and understand how it. Quick, no sign-up needed. Start now!en
In about 10 minutes, the Diane Poole Heller Attachment Quiz guides you through 16 questions about closeness, reassurance, independence, and conflict. Your result identifies your strongest current attachment affinity, including blended patterns, offering a concise starting point for self-reflection and more thoughtful understanding of relationship responses.
Questions: 1610 minutes
Diane Poole Heller Attachment: situation and reply bubbles
July 22, 2026July 22, 2026Material has been updatedJuly 22, 2026Material has been published
7,986 views
716 completions
632 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
632 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment AffinityAAA
Measures how strongly uncertainty or perceived distance in close relationships tends to trigger a need for reassurance, closeness, or fear of disconnection.
example score3/12
3/12Limited signalexample score
0 – 4Limited signal
5 – 8Context-dependent signal
9 – 12Strong affinity
A score of 3 falls in the Limited signal range, suggesting anxious/ambivalent responses show up infrequently for you in these situations.
Avoidant Attachment AffinityAAA
Measures how strongly you tend to use emotional distance and self-reliance to manage closeness in relationships.
example score5/12
5/12Selective distanceexample score
0 – 4Limited signal
5 – 8Selective distance
9 – 12Strong affinity
A score of 5 suggests selective distance, meaning you may protect independence or reduce emotional contact in certain situations, especially as closeness increases.
Disorganized Attachment AffinityDAA
Measures how often closeness in relationships brings conflicting approach-and-withdraw impulses, confusion, or abrupt shifts in connection.
example score4/12
4/12Limited signalexample score
0 – 4Limited signal
5 – 8Situational conflict
9 – 12Strong affinity
A score of 4 suggests limited signal for disorganized attachment patterns, with conflicted approach-and-withdraw responses not prominent in your answers.
Secure Attachment AffinitySAA
Measures the extent to which you tend to show secure attachment patterns such as trust, direct communication, and balanced closeness in close relationships.
example score6/12
6/12Situational accessexample score
0 – 4Less prominent
5 – 8Situational access
9 – 12Strong affinity
A score of 6 suggests you can access secure behaviors in some contexts, while certain stressors or relationship dynamics may make them harder to maintain consistently.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Relationship pattern seekers
41%OF USERS
People noticing repeating conflict, distance, or clinginess in dating or long-term partnerships who want a clearer picture of their attachment tendencies.
Healing and self-growth focused
34%OF USERS
People in therapy, recovery, or personal development who want a gentle reflection tool to name strengths and triggers in closeness.
Curious learners and friends
25%OF USERS
People exploring psychology content or comparing results with friends to better understand how different attachment styles can show up in relationships.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment AffinityAAA
You?
Average6.7
Typical rangeTypical4.6 – 8.9
Possible0 – 12
Avoidant Attachment AffinityAAA
You?
Average5
Typical rangeTypical3.5 – 6.5
Possible0 – 12
Disorganized Attachment AffinityDAA
You?
Average4
Typical rangeTypical2.5 – 5.5
Possible0 – 12
Secure Attachment AffinitySAA
You?
Average4.1
Typical rangeTypical2.2 – 5.9
Possible0 – 12
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Stay present and let the supportive moment continue.
    • Appreciate it, then steer toward a less personal subject fairly soon.
    • Feel exposed and create distance through humor, distraction, or ending the interaction.
    • Accept some warmth but keep part of the experience to myself.
    • It generally lasts unless something meaningful changes between us.
    • It helps, but small ambiguous cues can bring back some concern.
    • It offers temporary relief, yet I soon need new signs that everything is still okay.
    • It settles me for a while, although prolonged distance may revive the question.
    • Comforting overall, even though trust continues to grow gradually.
    • Welcome but unfamiliar, so I occasionally question whether it will last.
    • Both deeply wanted and strangely threatening, which can make my behavior shift abruptly.
    • Hard to absorb; I may test the connection or retreat when it starts to feel important.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Diane Poole Heller Attachment Quiz - Description and methodology of the test

For readers examining recurring reactions in close relationships, the diane poole heller attachment quiz offers a structured way to consider how reassurance, independence, vulnerability, and conflict influence behavior. As an attachment style quiz Diane Poole Heller supports conceptually, it helps readers notice patterns in the profile without treating any result as a permanent identity.

What This Assessment Explores

The items cover relationship situations involving disclosure, reassurance, ambiguity, support, separation, and conflict. They capture responses.

Four dimensions are:

  • Anxious/Ambivalent Attachment Affinity (0-12) shows a pull toward reassurance under uncertainty: Limited signal (0-4), Context-dependent signal (5-8), Strong affinity (9-12).
  • Avoidant Attachment Affinity (0-12) shows self-containment or distance as closeness increases: Limited signal (0-4), Selective distance (5-8), Strong affinity (9-12).
  • Disorganized Attachment Affinity (0-12) shows competing impulses toward connection and withdrawal: Limited signal (0-4), Situational conflict (5-8), Strong affinity (9-12).
  • Secure Attachment Affinity (0-12) shows access to trust, direct communication, and balanced closeness: Less prominent (0-4), Situational access (5-8), Strong affinity (9-12).

On this Diane Heller attachment quiz, the highest score is the strongest current affinity; scores within one point form a blended pattern.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each question presents a brief relational scenario with four response options. The choices describe reactions such as pursuing reassurance, protecting independence, setting limits while staying engaged, or shifting between approach and withdrawal. The result display presents four outcome scores.

The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Heller’s 2014 mini-questionnaire but is not an adaptation or digital reproduction of that source. Its four-way organization also aligns conceptually with Bartholomew and Horowitz’s 1991 model, while Heller’s 2019 book offers related discussion of attachment and relational regulation rather than psychometric evidence for this online version.

Across the four displayed outcomes, the highest score is the strongest current affinity, and scores within one point are read together as a blended result. The questionnaire does not state point contributions, so read the result from displayed scores and bands rather than an invented calculation. As a Dr Diane Poole Heller quiz related to her framework, this online questionnaire is an unvalidated self-report reflection: stress, context, memory, self-awareness, and response bias can affect it. It can organize reflection but cannot establish trauma, diagnosis, or complete relationship functioning.

Literature:
  • Heller, Diane Poole. 2014. Know Your Adult Attachment Style Mini-Questionnaire. Somatic Attachment Trainings and DARe Workshops.
  • Bartholomew, Kim, and Leonard M. Horowitz. 1991. Attachment Styles Among Young Adults: A Test of a Four-Category Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226-244. 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226
  • Heller, Diane Poole. 2019. The Power of Attachment: How to Create Deep and Lasting Intimate Relationships. Sounds True.

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment