Is My Dad a Narcissist Quiz
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- He makes a genuine effort to remember and respect it.
- He sometimes forgets or questions it but adjusts when reminded.
- He repeatedly argues that I have no right to that boundary or keeps testing it.
- He retaliates, threatens me, or forcibly crosses the boundary because I stated it.
- I am not assigned responsibility for regulating his emotions.
- This has happened occasionally, but it is not a continuing expectation.
- I regularly change my behavior to avoid blame, rage, withdrawal, or family disruption.
- I have been threatened, forced, or hurt because I did not manage his mood as demanded.
- He supports choices that fit me, even when they are not what he would choose.
- He sometimes seeks credit or expresses disappointment but still allows the choice to be mine.
- He repeatedly pressures me to choose what makes him look successful or important.
- He sabotages opportunities or punishes me for pursuing a path that does not serve his image.
Is My Dad a Narcissist Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People confused by a father's reactions may use the Is My Dad a Narcissist Quiz to examine recurring interactions around respect, control, emotional responsiveness, and safety. Readers concerned about controlling father behavior can use its structure to identify recurring patterns in boundaries, conflict, and emotional responsiveness. It is designed for personal reflection while evaluating a father-child relationship.
What This Assessment Explores
These questions examine responses to boundaries, hurt, independence, outside relationships, and repair. The result maps interaction patterns rather than confirming a personality label. The questionnaire is most useful when you compare its signals with lived experiences and consider emotional invalidation by a parent alongside control, boundary pressure, and safety concerns.
The three displayed dimensions are:
- Accountability and Conflict Safety (0-15) reflects repair, conflict responsibility, intimidation, and safety; bands: No points recorded (0), Concern noticed (1-2), Support signal (3-15).
- Autonomy and Boundary Respect (0-15) reflects privacy, choices, relationships, and saying no; bands: No points recorded (0), Concern noticed (1-2), Support signal (3-15).
- Emotional Attunement and Regard (0-15) reflects regard for feelings and identity; bands: No points recorded (0), Concern noticed (1-2), Support signal (3-15).
A zero means no listed indicator was endorsed; it does not prove that every interaction is safe or respectful.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item offers four ordered responses, moving from respectful behavior through occasional difficulty, repeated control or invalidation, and serious coercion or harm. Answers are grouped by theme, with a separate total for each dimension. The displayed bands are unvalidated reflection signals rather than standardized severity scores; they prompt examination of specific experiences rather than ranking harm.
The content is conceptually consistent with REACH, which examines emotional-abuse experiences. The Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales offer a comparison point for conflict behavior; the parental psychological control framework addresses pressure on independence, and research on self-focused, controlling parenting adds context for image-driven interactions. This questionnaire is not an adaptation of those measures or studies, so their psychometric findings cannot be transferred to it.
Self-report can be shaped by memory, current stress, family context, and willingness to disclose. The result may help you examine parental control patterns such as pressure around independence, dismissal of feelings, or retaliation after a boundary. Any threat, forced contact, injury, or serious coercion matters independently of the total; if immediate danger is possible, prioritize safety and contact local emergency or specialist services.
- Goodall, Karen, and Vilas Sawrikar. (2023). The Rating of Emotional Abuse in Childhood (REACH) Questionnaire: A new self-report measure assessing history of childhood emotional abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 146, 106498. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106498
- Straus, Murray A., Sherry L. Hamby, David Finkelhor, David W. Moore, and Richard Runyan. (1998). Identification of Child Maltreatment With the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales: Development and Psychometric Data for a National Sample of American Parents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22(4), 249-270. 10.1016/S0145-2134(97)00174-9
- Hart, Claire M., Reece D. Bush-Evans, Erica G. Hepper, and Hannah M. Hickman. (2017). The Children of Narcissus: Insights into Narcissists' Parenting Styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 249-254. 10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.019
- Barber, Brian K. (1996). Parental Psychological Control: Revisiting a Neglected Construct. Child Development, 67(6), 3296-3319. 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01915.x
Updated: