Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
addiction

Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test

Take the online Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
In about three minutes, the Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test guides you through 14 questions about boundaries, self-sacrifice, relationships, and emotional patterns. Your result indicates how strongly these tendencies may appear, offering a focused starting point for reflecting on your needs, choices, and balance when responding to other people.
Questions: 143 minutes
Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test: agreement scale card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
25,737 views
2,912 completions
2,426 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,426 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

CodependencyC
Measures the degree of codependent tendencies such as overinvolvement in others’ needs, difficulty maintaining boundaries, and self-sacrifice.
example score80/100
80/100Highexample score
0 – 33Low
34 – 66Moderate
67 – 100High
A score of 80 falls in the High range, suggesting pronounced codependent patterns such as prioritizing others’ emotions and responsibilities over one’s own needs.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

People in draining relationships
41%OF USERS
They feel responsible for someone else’s mood or problems and want to understand whether they are losing themselves in the relationship.
Adult children of dysfunctional families
34%OF USERS
They grew up with blurred roles or addiction/chaos at home and want to check how those patterns affect their boundaries today.
Clients in therapy or counseling
25%OF USERS
They take it to get a quick baseline of codependent tendencies to guide discussions and track progress over time.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Spann-Fisher Codependency ScaleSCS
You?
Average54.4
Typical rangeTypical40.8 – 67.9
Possible0 – 100
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Moderately disagree
    • Slightly disagree
    • Slightly agree
    • Moderately agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Moderately disagree
    • Slightly disagree
    • Slightly agree
    • Moderately agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Moderately disagree
    • Slightly disagree
    • Slightly agree
    • Moderately agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test

addiction
codependency

People who want to examine recurring patterns of over-responsibility, boundary difficulty, or self-neglect can use this questionnaire for a structured moment of self-reflection. The Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test focuses on how a person responds to relationships, conflict, personal needs, and emotional pressure. It is useful for readers seeking a clearer picture of codependent behavior without reducing a complex pattern to one label.

What This Assessment Explores

Questions address decisions, saying no, receiving compliments, solving other people’s problems, painful relationships, and putting personal needs aside. The test suits readers examining whether such patterns recur in relationships and emotional life.

The result is reported on Codependency, 0-100, with Low 0-33, Moderate 34-66, and High 67-100 bands. The catalogue defines this codependency scale as measuring excessive involvement in others’ problems, difficulty with personal boundaries, and self-sacrifice, and uses it to indicate the apparent severity of these tendencies.

The items group into these practical themes:

  • Boundaries show whether saying no and protecting personal limits feel difficult.
  • Self-sacrifice shows how readily personal needs move behind other people’s needs.
  • Relationship involvement reflects painful attachments and overinvestment in solving problems.
  • Emotional responses capture hidden feelings, resentment, fear, and conflict avoidance.

The band indicates the apparent severity of these codependency features.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each statement uses six ordered agreement choices, ranging from disagreement to agreement, although the endpoint wording varies slightly between items. This format captures degrees of experience across decisions, boundaries, relationships, and emotional reactions; the scoring formula and any reverse-keying are not documented. Several items address reliance on others.

The questionnaire presents one overall Codependency result. The displayed range does not reveal item weights, answer-point assignments, or the conversion formula.

The closest published reference is the Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale (Fischer, Spann, & Crawford, 1991). The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that instrument, but its online form should not be assumed identical to the original. Lindley, Giordano, and Hammer (1999) discuss psychometric issues in codependency measures, while Marks, Blore, Hine, and Dear (2012) show that revised measures can differ in structure and validation. Beattie provides a complementary self-care perspective on overinvolvement and control.

This codependency questionnaire has research context, but the cited studies do not establish norms, reliability, or validity for this exact online form. As a self-report tool, the result may also shift with current relationships, self-awareness, and willingness to disclose.

Author: Melody Beattie, Timmen L. Cermak
Literature:
  • Fischer, Judith L., Lynda Spann, and Duane Crawford. (1991). Measuring Codependency. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 8(1), 87-100. 10.1300/J020V08N01_06
  • Lindley, Natasha R., Peter J. Giordano, and Elliott D. Hammer. (1999). Codependency: Predictors and Psychometric Issues. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 59-64. 10.1002/%28SICI%291097-4679%28199901%2955%3A1%3C59%3A%3AAID-JCLP5%3E3.0.CO%3B2-M
  • Marks, Anthony D. G., Rebecca L. Blore, Donald W. Hine, and Greg E. Dear. (2012). Development and Validation of a Revised Measure of Codependency. Australian Journal of Psychology, 64(3), 119-127. 10.1111/j.1742-9536.2011.00034.x
  • Beattie, Melody. (1987). Codependent No More: How to Stop Controlling Others and Start Caring for Yourself. New York: Harper/Hazelden.

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment