Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Moderately disagree
- Slightly disagree
- Slightly agree
- Moderately agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Moderately disagree
- Slightly disagree
- Slightly agree
- Moderately agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Moderately disagree
- Slightly disagree
- Slightly agree
- Moderately agree
- Strongly agree
Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to examine recurring patterns of over-responsibility, boundary difficulty, or self-neglect can use this questionnaire for a structured moment of self-reflection. The Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test focuses on how a person responds to relationships, conflict, personal needs, and emotional pressure. It is useful for readers seeking a clearer picture of codependent behavior without reducing a complex pattern to one label.
What This Assessment Explores
Questions address decisions, saying no, receiving compliments, solving other people’s problems, painful relationships, and putting personal needs aside. The test suits readers examining whether such patterns recur in relationships and emotional life.
The result is reported on Codependency, 0-100, with Low 0-33, Moderate 34-66, and High 67-100 bands. The catalogue defines this codependency scale as measuring excessive involvement in others’ problems, difficulty with personal boundaries, and self-sacrifice, and uses it to indicate the apparent severity of these tendencies.
The items group into these practical themes:
- Boundaries show whether saying no and protecting personal limits feel difficult.
- Self-sacrifice shows how readily personal needs move behind other people’s needs.
- Relationship involvement reflects painful attachments and overinvestment in solving problems.
- Emotional responses capture hidden feelings, resentment, fear, and conflict avoidance.
The band indicates the apparent severity of these codependency features.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each statement uses six ordered agreement choices, ranging from disagreement to agreement, although the endpoint wording varies slightly between items. This format captures degrees of experience across decisions, boundaries, relationships, and emotional reactions; the scoring formula and any reverse-keying are not documented. Several items address reliance on others.
The questionnaire presents one overall Codependency result. The displayed range does not reveal item weights, answer-point assignments, or the conversion formula.
The closest published reference is the Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale (Fischer, Spann, & Crawford, 1991). The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that instrument, but its online form should not be assumed identical to the original. Lindley, Giordano, and Hammer (1999) discuss psychometric issues in codependency measures, while Marks, Blore, Hine, and Dear (2012) show that revised measures can differ in structure and validation. Beattie provides a complementary self-care perspective on overinvolvement and control.
This codependency questionnaire has research context, but the cited studies do not establish norms, reliability, or validity for this exact online form. As a self-report tool, the result may also shift with current relationships, self-awareness, and willingness to disclose.
- Fischer, Judith L., Lynda Spann, and Duane Crawford. (1991). Measuring Codependency. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 8(1), 87-100. 10.1300/J020V08N01_06
- Lindley, Natasha R., Peter J. Giordano, and Elliott D. Hammer. (1999). Codependency: Predictors and Psychometric Issues. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 59-64. 10.1002/%28SICI%291097-4679%28199901%2955%3A1%3C59%3A%3AAID-JCLP5%3E3.0.CO%3B2-M
- Marks, Anthony D. G., Rebecca L. Blore, Donald W. Hine, and Greg E. Dear. (2012). Development and Validation of a Revised Measure of Codependency. Australian Journal of Psychology, 64(3), 119-127. 10.1111/j.1742-9536.2011.00034.x
- Beattie, Melody. (1987). Codependent No More: How to Stop Controlling Others and Start Caring for Yourself. New York: Harper/Hazelden.
Updated: