Depression Symptom and Severity Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- True, I agree
- False, I disagree
- True; I agree
- Not true; I disagree
- True
- False
Depression Symptom and Severity Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want a structured view of current experiences associated with depression may use the Depression Symptom and Severity Questionnaire Test to organize concerns into a symptom profile. It is suited to self-reflection when mood, sleep, energy, concentration, guilt, outlook, interest, appetite, or safety-related thoughts feel relevant. A depression symptoms questionnaire can make patterns easier to notice and discuss.
What the Test Measures
For readers, a depression severity questionnaire separates emotional, cognitive, physical, motivational, and response-style features. Dimensions are:
- Emotional/self-evaluative scales include Depressed Mood 0-6 [Minimal 0-4/Significant 5-6]; Bleak View of the Future 0-6 [Low 0-3/Moderate 4-4/Significant 5-6]; Guilt Ideation 0-6 [Low 0-3/Moderate 4-4/High 5-6]; Low Self-Esteem 0-6 [Within typical range 0-4/Clinically significant 5-6].
- Physical/motivational scales include Decreased Appetite 0-6 [None to mild 0-4/Clinically significant 5-6]; Sleep Disturbance 0-6 [None to mild 0-4/Significant 5-6]; Decreased Energy 0-6 [Low/none 0-4/Significant 5-6]; Loss of Interest 0-6 [Low 0-3/Elevated 4-6].
- Attention/safety/validity scales include Reduced Attention 0-6 [None/minimal 0-4/Symptom present 5-6]; Self-Harm Ideation 0-6 [None/Low 0-4/Clinically significant 5-6]; Defensiveness/Dissimulation 0-6 [Low dissimulation 0-3/Elevated dissimulation 4-6]; Symptom Exaggeration/Malingering 0-6 [Typical responding 0-3/Elevated exaggeration risk 4-4/High simulation risk 5-6].
Methodology and Evidence Base
Within a depression symptom assessment, each statement uses a binary response-typically true/agree or false/disagree, sometimes displayed as 1 or 2. Responses are combined into separate symptom and validity scores, so the result is a pattern across dimensions rather than a single total. Honest, current appraisal matters because recall, ambiguity, and response style can alter the profile.
OSGD (Raspopin, 2011) is the closest conceptual source, linking depressive symptom content with response-credibility checks. The themes also align with depressive symptom descriptions in ICD-10. Beck Depression Inventory research provides context for self-report measurement, but this questionnaire is not the BDI or a validated adaptation of it.
Interpretation should follow the stated definitions and displayed bands: higher symptom scores indicate greater prominence where stated, while elevated validity scores can make results less reliable. This online version is best treated as a structured self-report profile rather than a standardized diagnostic instrument. Current mood, stress, self-awareness, and disclosure style can influence answers, so context is needed before broader conclusions.
- Raspopin, Evgeny V. (2011). Questionnaire of Symptoms and Depth of Depression (OSGD). Psychological Diagnostics, No. 3, pp. 58-74.
- World Health Organization. (1992). The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization.
- Beck, Aaron T., Steer, Robert A., & Carbin, Margery G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8(1), 77-100. 10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5
Updated: