Socially Oriented Activity Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Not at all like me
- Unlike me
- Mostly unlike me
- Neither like me nor unlike me
- Mostly like me
- Like me
- Very much like me
- Not at all like me
- Not like me
- Somewhat not like me
- Somewhat in between
- Somewhat like me
- Like me
- Very much like me
- Not at all like me
- Not like me
- Rather unlike me
- Neither like me nor unlike me
- Somewhat like me
- Like me
- Very much like me
Socially Oriented Activity Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
For readers who want to examine their usual functioning in social situations, the Socially Oriented Activity Questionnaire Test offers a structured profile without reducing everyday interaction to a single trait. It may help people reflecting on relationships, group settings, or community roles notice recurring patterns in how they participate and respond. As a social activity questionnaire, it supports focused self-reflection rather than a single label.
What This Assessment Explores
A social engagement assessment groups motives, leadership, and participation.
These dimensions include:
- Motivational (1-7) measures helping and usefulness: Lower motivation 1-3.5; Moderate motivation 3.6-5.7; Higher motivation 5.8-7.
- Emotional and Status (1-7) measures contacts, communication, leadership, and status-oriented interaction: Lower social engagement 1-3.3; Moderate social engagement 3.4-5.6; High social engagement 5.7-7.
- Cognitive (1-7) measures communication rules, social identity, and anticipated outcomes: Low 1-3.9; Moderate 4-6; High 6.1-7.
- Socially Oriented Activity (4-28) measures overall social engagement, cooperation, and community participation; higher scores indicate activity, lower scores suggest withdrawal/passivity: Low 4-15.6; Moderate 15.7-22.5; High 22.6-28.
- Behavioral (1-7) measures interaction effectiveness, perspective-taking, and engagement: Low 1-3; Moderate 4-5; High 6-7.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement is a self-description rated on a seven-point continuum from Not at all like me to Very much like me. The items address communication rules, anticipated outcomes, social identity, contact, leadership, helping, perspective-taking, and interest in other people.
Responses are combined into the displayed profile, but the questionnaire does not document item weights, reverse-keying, norms, or a calculation formula. Its ranges are therefore descriptive outputs rather than validated clinical cutoffs. This social interaction test is most useful when answers represent usual patterns, not a temporary mood.
The themes are conceptually consistent with the Socially-Oriented Activity Components Questionnaire, while Shamionov’s 2018 work provides a broader account of social activity and participation. This questionnaire is not an adaptation of that instrument, so its reliability, validity, standardization, and population norms cannot be assumed from the publications. Self-report remains sensitive to context, self-awareness, and favorable self-presentation; use the profile to guide reflection on concrete experiences.
- Shamionov, Rail M., and Grigoryeva, Marina V. (2019). Technique for Diagnostic Assessment of Socially-Oriented Activity Components. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 74, 26-41.
- Shamionov, Rail M. (2018). Social Activity of Personality and Groups: Definition, Structure and Mechanisms. RUDN Journal of Psychology and Pedagogics, 15(4), 379-394. 10.22363/2313-1683-2018-15-4-379-394
Updated: