Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
well-being

School Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire Test

Take the online School Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take School Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Designed for students, the School Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire Test contains 24 questions and takes about 5 minutes. It explores physical well-being, feelings about school, satisfaction, and relationships with classmates and teachers, helping you reflect on your school experience and identify areas that may deserve attention.
Questions: 245 minutes
School Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire Test: sample question card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
32,624 views
2,032 completions
1,673 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,673 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Physical Well-BeingPWB
Assesses how a student subjectively rates their physical comfort and well-being while at school.
example score47/100
47/100Low well-beingexample score
0 – 49Low well-being
50 – 74Moderate well-being
75 – 100High well-being
A score of 47 falls in the Low well-being range, suggesting the student may feel physically uncomfortable at school or notice physical complaints more often than peers.
Hostility Toward ClassmatesHTC
Measures how hostile or conflict-prone a student’s relationships with classmates are, with higher scores reflecting more positive peer relations.
example score71/100
71/100Low hostilityexample score
0 – 33High hostility
34 – 66Mixed/variable relations
67 – 100Low hostility
A score of 71 falls in the Low hostility range, suggesting generally positive and non-confrontational relationships with classmates.
Cooperation With ClassmatesCWC
Measures how much students cooperate, help each other, and maintain supportive interactions with classmates.
example score53/100
53/100Moderate collaborationexample score
0 – 39Low collaboration
40 – 69Moderate collaboration
70 – 100High collaboration
A score of 53 indicates a moderate level of collaboration, suggesting some supportive peer interaction alongside room to strengthen teamwork and mutual help in the class.
Affect Toward SchoolATS
Assesses the student’s overall emotional attitude toward school, reflecting the balance of positive versus negative feelings about school experiences.
example score52/100
52/100Mixedexample score
0 – 39Mostly negative
40 – 69Mixed
70 – 100Mostly positive
A score of 52 falls in the Mixed range, suggesting the student experiences a blend of positive and negative emotions toward school rather than a clearly positive or negative overall attitude.
School SatisfactionSS
Measures how satisfied a student feels with the school environment, learning conditions, and relationships with teachers.
example score7/100
7/100Low satisfactionexample score
0 – 33Low satisfaction
34 – 66Moderate satisfaction
67 – 100High satisfaction
A score of 7 indicates low satisfaction with school, suggesting the student may currently feel unhappy with aspects of the school environment or teacher relationships.
Subjective Well-BeingSWB
This scale measures a student’s overall satisfaction with school life, including emotional comfort and social relationships at school.
example score71/100
71/100Moderate well-beingexample score
0 – 49Low well-being
50 – 74Moderate well-being
75 – 100High well-being
A score of 71 indicates generally positive school well-being with some areas that may still feel less comfortable or satisfying.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Classroom teachers and homeroom leads
46%OF USERS
They use it to quickly check how students feel in class, spot worries early, and plan supportive classroom actions.
School psychologists and counselors
34%OF USERS
They administer it to screen for stress, conflict, or low well-being and decide who may need follow-up support.
School administrators and coordinators
20%OF USERS
They run it for grade-level monitoring to identify patterns across classes and guide school-wide well-being initiatives.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Physical well-beingPw
You?
Average37.4
Typical rangeTypical24.7 – 50
Possible0 – 100
Hostility with classmatesHwc
You?
Average40.3
Typical rangeTypical23.5 – 57.2
Possible0 – 100
Collaboration with classmatesCwc
You?
Average60.3
Typical rangeTypical45.8 – 74.7
Possible0 – 100
Affect Toward SchoolATS
You?
Average69.4
Typical rangeTypical56.3 – 82.5
Possible0 – 100
Satisfaction with SchoolSwS
You?
Average61.7
Typical rangeTypical49.4 – 74.1
Possible0 – 100
Subjective Well-Being ScaleSWS
You?
Average51.1
Typical rangeTypical34.3 – 67.9
Possible0 – 100
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

Dear student, You are asked to provide information about yourself and your life at school by answering the questions in this questionnaire. This is not a test of knowledge, and there are no right or wrong answers. No one you know will be able to find out how you answered any individual question. Please read each item carefully and answer every question without skipping any. If anything is unclear, ask the teacher or the adult administering the survey.
    • No
    • Probably no
    • Probably yes
    • Yes
    • No
    • Probably no
    • Probably yes
    • Yes
    • No
    • Probably not
    • Probably yes
    • Yes
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

School Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test

well-being

Students who want a clearer picture of how school feels day to day can use this questionnaire to reflect on health, emotions, learning conditions, and peer relationships. The School Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire Test is suited to a student considering whether school life feels supportive, stressful, satisfying, or mixed. As a school well-being questionnaire, it offers a profile rather than a single global judgment, making patterns easier to notice and discuss.

What This Questionnaire Measures

The questionnaire treats school well-being as multidimensional, combining physical condition, school satisfaction, emotional reactions, and peer relationships. This student well-being assessment can reveal uneven experiences, such as feeling satisfied with lessons while finding class relationships difficult.

The profile reports six dimensions, each on a 0-100 scale:

  • Physical Well-Being (0-100) rates physical condition: Low well-being (0-49), Moderate well-being (50-74), High well-being (75-100).
  • Cooperation With Classmates (0-100) rates mutual support: Low collaboration (0-39), Moderate collaboration (40-69), High collaboration (70-100).
  • Hostility Toward Classmates (0-100) reads higher with less hostility: High hostility (0-33), Mixed/variable relations (34-66), Low hostility (67-100).
  • Affect Toward School (0-100) captures emotional tone: Mostly negative (0-39), Mixed (40-69), Mostly positive (70-100).
  • School Satisfaction (0-100) rates school approval: Low satisfaction (0-33), Moderate satisfaction (34-66), High satisfaction (67-100).
  • Subjective Well-Being (0-100) summarizes school life: Low well-being (0-49), Moderate well-being (50-74), High well-being (75-100).

Methodology and Evidence Base

Items use short self-report judgments. School and relationship statements use four-point agreement or frequency options, while the energy and health items use five-point responses. The format captures both appraisals and recent experiences without relying on one response style.

Scoring presents responses as displayed scale scores, with higher values generally representing more favorable school experiences; the hostility dimension follows the direction stated in its result definition. The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Multicomponent school well-being model (Kanonire et al., 2020), not a direct adaptation of it. That model distinguishes school satisfaction, affect, peer communication, and physical well-being while allowing for an overall factor. The questionnaire also relates to the BASWBSS, the Classmates’ Friendship Relationships Questionnaire, and Ryff’s account of positive functioning.

These sources support the questionnaire’s conceptual coverage, but the displayed result should not be read as the published instruments’ norms or psychometric statistics. The result is a structured snapshot of subjective well-being at school. Mood, memory, interpretation, and willingness to disclose can affect self-report, so scores are most useful alongside context and changes over time.

Author: Carol D. Ryff, Ed Diener, Michael Argyle
Literature:
  • Kanonire, T., Federiakin, D. A., & Uglanova, I. L. (2020). Multicomponent framework for students’ subjective well-being in elementary school. School Psychology, 35(5), 321-331. 10.1037/spq0000397
  • Tian, L., Wang, D., & Huebner, E. (2015). Development and Validation of the Brief Adolescents’ Subjective Well-Being in School Scale (BASWBSS). Social Indicators Research, 120(2), 615-634. 10.1007/s11205-014-0603-0
  • Turilova-Miščenko, T., & Raščevska, M. (2008). Psychometric Properties of Classmates’ Friendship Relationships Questionnaire. Baltic Journal of Psychology, 9(1-2), 129-140.
  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081. 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment