Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
well-being

Well being test

Well-Being Test - Free Wellness Quiz Online - FreudlyTake a free Well-Being Test and find out your wellness level. Online quiz with accurate results and interpretation - quick, no sign-up needed.en
The well-being test is a multi-dimensional self-report instrument built on Seligman's PERMA model and extended with four additional domains — physical health, economic stability, loneliness, and negative emotions — to produce a comprehensive profile of how employees are flourishing at work. Each domain yields an independent score, revealing precisely where subjective well-being is strong and where it is being undermined by specific workplace or personal factors
Start Online Test
Questions: 92 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
18,999 views
1,209 completions
1,014 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
4/5
Economic Security (ES)
Measures an employee’s perceived financial stability and sense of protection from material risks at work and in the near future.
Low security
Moderate security
High security
12.4: Low security | 2.53.4: Moderate security | 3.55: High security
A score of 4 indicates a high sense of economic security, reflecting generally confident expectations about financial stability with minimal perceived material threats.
example score
3/5
Physical Environment (PE)
Assesses how comfortable, safe, and well-equipped the employee’s physical workspace feels.
Needs improvement
Adequate
Favorable
01: Needs improvement | 23: Adequate | 45: Favorable
A score of 3 indicates the physical workspace is generally adequate, with some aspects that could be improved to better support comfort, safety, or equipment needs.
example score
2/5
Growth Orientation (GO)
Measures an employee’s orientation toward learning, development, and openness to change at work.
Low
Moderate
High
01: Low | 23: Moderate | 45: High
A score of 2 suggests a moderate growth orientation, with some openness to learning and change but not consistently across situations.
example score
2/5
Health (H)
Assesses the employee’s subjective physical and mental well-being in the work context.
Low
Moderate
High
01: Low | 23: Moderate | 45: High
A score of 2 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting mixed or variable well-being with some signs of strain at times.
example score
2/5
Accomplishment (A)
Assesses how successful and accomplished a person feels in meeting their work goals and completing tasks.
Low
Moderate
High
01: Low | 23: Moderate | 45: High
A score of 2 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a mixed sense of accomplishment with some goals met but overall satisfaction with results not consistently strong.
example score
3/5
Work Meaningfulness (WM)
Measures how meaningful and important an employee perceives their work to be in their life.
Low meaning
Moderate meaning
High meaning
01: Low meaning | 23: Moderate meaning | 45: High meaning
A score of 3 indicates a moderate sense of work importance, suggesting the job feels somewhat meaningful but not consistently central or strongly significant.
example score
2/5
Relationships (R)
Measures how supported and valued an employee feels through connections with colleagues and management at work.
Low support
Moderate support
Strong support
02: Low support | 34: Moderate support | 5: Strong support
A score of 2 suggests limited perceived support and fewer strong workplace connections compared with higher scores.
example score
2/5
Engagement (E)
Measures how absorbed and interested an employee feels in their work activities, reflecting motivation and flow-like engagement.
Low
Moderate
High
01: Low | 23: Moderate | 45: High
A score of 2 indicates moderate engagement, suggesting some interest in work tasks but limited sustained absorption or flow.
example score
12/20
Externally Comparable (EC)
This scale measures how objective conditions (e.g., health, physical environment, and economic security) influence perceived job satisfaction.
Low
Moderate
High
49: Low | 1014: Moderate | 1520: High
A score of 12 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting objective conditions are generally adequate but may include some areas that limit overall satisfaction.
example score
10/15
Internal Social and Need Fulfillment Well-Being (ISaNFWB)
Measures perceived support, sense of purpose, and progress toward goals at work as reflected in relationships, meaning, and achievement.
Low
Moderate
High
37: Low | 811: Moderate | 1215: High
A score of 10 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting generally adequate relationships, meaning, and goal progress with some areas that may benefit from additional support or clarity.
example score
7/10
Internal Affective-Needs Well-Being (IANWB)
Measures the intensity of positive emotions and engagement an employee experiences in their work activities.
Low
Moderate
High
24: Low | 57: Moderate | 810: High
A score of 7 indicates a moderate level of affective-need internal well-being, suggesting generally positive emotions and interest at work with some room to increase engagement.
example score
30/45
Overall Employee Subjective Well-Being Index (OESWBI)
Measures an employee’s overall subjective well-being at work, combining satisfaction, positive functioning, and workplace-related emotional experience.
Low well-being
Moderate well-being
High well-being
920: Low well-being | 2133: Moderate well-being | 3445: High well-being
A score of 30 indicates moderate subjective well-being, suggesting generally stable functioning at work with some areas that may still benefit from support or improvement.
example score
3/5
Positive Emotions (PE)
Measures how often an employee experiences joy, pleasure, and other positive feelings in everyday work life.
Low
Moderate
High
01: Low | 23: Moderate | 45: High
A score of 3 indicates a moderate level of positive emotions at work, suggesting a generally positive mood with room to strengthen day-to-day enjoyment.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

HR and People Ops
41%OF USERS
They use it to quickly gauge employee well-being, spot stress hotspots, and track the impact of new HR initiatives.
Team Leaders and Managers
34%OF USERS
They take it to understand morale and engagement in their teams and decide where support or workload changes are needed.
Employees in pulse checks
25%OF USERS
They complete it during workplace surveys to reflect how they feel at work and signal what helps or hurts their day-to-day experience.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Economic Security (ES)
Economic Security (ES)
Average
3.4
Normal range
2.93.9
min.
1
max.
5
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Physical Environment (PE)
Physical Environment (PE)
Average
2.3
Normal range
1.62.9
min.
0
max.
5
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Growth Mindset (GM)
Growth Mindset (GM)
Average
2.9
Normal range
23.8
min.
0
max.
5
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Health (H)
Health (H)
Average
2.2
Normal range
1.33.1
min.
0
max.
5
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Achievement (A)
Achievement (A)
Average
1.6
Normal range
0.82.4
min.
0
max.
5
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
The importance of work (Tiow)
The importance of work (Tiow)
Average
3.3
Normal range
2.73.9
min.
0
max.
5
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Relationships (R)
Relationships (R)
Average
2.2
Normal range
1.43
min.
0
max.
5
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Engagement (E)
Engagement (E)
Average
3.4
Normal range
2.74
min.
0
max.
5
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Visually comparable (Vc)
Visually comparable (Vc)
Average
9.1
Normal range
6.711.4
min.
4
max.
20
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Social and needs-related internal (Sani)
Social and needs-related internal (Sani)
Average
11.3
Normal range
9.613
min.
3
max.
15
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Affective-need internal (Ai)
Affective-need internal (Ai)
Average
5.6
Normal range
4.17
min.
2
max.
10
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Composite Indicator of an Employee's Subjective Well-Being (CIoaESW)
Composite Indicator of an Employee's Subjective Well-Being (CIoaESW)
Average
27.1
Normal range
22.531.7
min.
9
max.
45
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Positive emotions (Pe)
Positive emotions (Pe)
Average
3.4
Normal range
2.64.2
min.
0
max.
5
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Employee Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire, PERMA+4 Test
well-being
arrange
positive psychology
job satisfaction

The well-being test is a multi-dimensional self-report instrument built on Seligman's PERMA model and extended with four additional domains — physical health, economic stability, loneliness, and negative emotions — to produce a comprehensive profile of how employees are flourishing at work. Each domain yields an independent score, revealing precisely where subjective well-being is strong and where it is being undermined by specific workplace or personal factors.

Why Take a Well-Being Test

Workplace wellness programs often rely on broad satisfaction scores that cannot identify which specific domain — meaning, engagement, relationships, or physical health — is driving distress or disengagement. A structured well-being assessment based on the PERMA model gives organizations and individuals actionable, domain-specific data rather than a single number that obscures the real picture.

A well-being questionnaire like this one is used by HR teams, occupational psychologists, and coaches to benchmark employee well-being, identify at-risk groups, and track the impact of workplace interventions over time. For individuals, results provide a clear starting point for understanding what is draining energy and what is already supporting flourishing in their work life.

What the Assessment Measures

  • Positive Emotions (P) — the frequency of positive emotions such as joy, gratitude, and contentment experienced in the work context, a core indicator of subjective well-being.
  • Engagement (E) — the degree of absorption and involvement in work tasks, including experiences of flow and intrinsic motivation.
  • Relationships (R) — the quality of social connections at work, including perceived support, trust, and belonging within teams.
  • Meaning (M) — the extent to which work is experienced as purposeful and aligned with personal values, a key driver of long-term psychological well-being.
  • Accomplishment (A) — perceived progress toward meaningful goals and a sense of achievement in one's professional role.
  • Physical Health, Economic Stability, Loneliness, Negative Emotions (+4) — four additional domains that extend the original PERMA model to capture material and physical factors known to significantly influence employee flourishing and life satisfaction.

Who This Assessment Is For

The well-being test is appropriate for employees, managers, and HR professionals who want a structured, evidence-based snapshot of how individuals or teams are thriving at work. Organizations use it to measure the impact of wellness initiatives, identify disengagement risk, and prioritize where to direct support resources. Coaches and occupational psychologists use the PERMA+4 well-being assessment during intake to map the specific domains driving burnout, low motivation, or reduced performance. The questionnaire is straightforward to complete — respondents simply rate how often they experience each described state — and requires no prior knowledge of positive psychology.

Clinical Validity and Use in Practice

The PERMA+4 framework extends Seligman's validated PERMA model with four empirically supported additional domains, producing a richer and more ecologically valid measure of employee well-being than single-dimension scales. Research using PERMA-based instruments consistently shows strong associations between domain scores and outcomes including job performance, absenteeism, burnout, and life satisfaction. Results should be interpreted as indicators of current subjective well-being and are most useful when reviewed alongside job role context, recent life events, and organizational data. Repeated administration using consistent instructions allows the instrument to track meaningful change over time, making it a practical tool for evaluating the effectiveness of workplace wellness programs.

Author: Ed Diener, Martin E. P. Seligman
Literature: Seligman, M. E. P. Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press. 2011.; Donaldson, S. I., & Donaldson, S. I. The positive functioning at work scale: Psychometric assessment, validation, and measurement invariance. Journal of Well-Being Assessment. 2021.; Donaldson, S. I., Donaldson, S. I., McQuaid, M., & Kern, M. L. The PERMA+4 short scale: A cross-cultural empirical validation using item response theory. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology. 2023.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment