Well being test

The well-being test is a multi-dimensional self-report instrument built on Seligman's PERMA model and extended with four additional domains — physical health, economic stability, loneliness, and negative emotions — to produce a comprehensive profile of how employees are flourishing at work. Each domain yields an independent score, revealing precisely where subjective well-being is strong and where it is being undermined by specific workplace or personal factors
Start Online Test
Questions92 minutes
Hi! My name is Freudly, i am an AI therapist, I will give you an interpretation of the test after you complete it.
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
15,855 views
927 completions
778 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
4/5
Economic Security (ES)
Measures an employee’s perceived financial stability and sense of protection from material risks at work and in the near future.
Low security
Moderate security
High security
12.4Low security2.53.4Moderate security3.55High security
A score of 4 indicates a high sense of economic security, reflecting generally confident expectations about financial stability with minimal perceived material threats.
example score
3/5
Physical Environment (PE)
Assesses how comfortable, safe, and well-equipped the employee’s physical workspace feels.
Needs improvement
Adequate
Favorable
01Needs improvement23Adequate45Favorable
A score of 3 indicates the physical workspace is generally adequate, with some aspects that could be improved to better support comfort, safety, or equipment needs.
example score
2/5
Growth Orientation (GO)
Measures an employee’s orientation toward learning, development, and openness to change at work.
Low
Moderate
High
01Low23Moderate45High
A score of 2 suggests a moderate growth orientation, with some openness to learning and change but not consistently across situations.
example score
2/5
Health (H)
Assesses the employee’s subjective physical and mental well-being in the work context.
Low
Moderate
High
01Low23Moderate45High
A score of 2 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting mixed or variable well-being with some signs of strain at times.
example score
2/5
Accomplishment (A)
Assesses how successful and accomplished a person feels in meeting their work goals and completing tasks.
Low
Moderate
High
01Low23Moderate45High
A score of 2 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a mixed sense of accomplishment with some goals met but overall satisfaction with results not consistently strong.
example score
3/5
Work Meaningfulness (WM)
Measures how meaningful and important an employee perceives their work to be in their life.
Low meaning
Moderate meaning
High meaning
01Low meaning23Moderate meaning45High meaning
A score of 3 indicates a moderate sense of work importance, suggesting the job feels somewhat meaningful but not consistently central or strongly significant.
example score
2/5
Relationships (R)
Measures how supported and valued an employee feels through connections with colleagues and management at work.
Low support
Moderate support
Strong support
02Low support34Moderate support5Strong support
A score of 2 suggests limited perceived support and fewer strong workplace connections compared with higher scores.
example score
2/5
Engagement (E)
Measures how absorbed and interested an employee feels in their work activities, reflecting motivation and flow-like engagement.
Low
Moderate
High
01Low23Moderate45High
A score of 2 indicates moderate engagement, suggesting some interest in work tasks but limited sustained absorption or flow.
example score
12/20
Externally Comparable (EC)
This scale measures how objective conditions (e.g., health, physical environment, and economic security) influence perceived job satisfaction.
Low
Moderate
High
49Low1014Moderate1520High
A score of 12 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting objective conditions are generally adequate but may include some areas that limit overall satisfaction.
example score
10/15
Internal Social and Need Fulfillment Well-Being (ISaNFWB)
Measures perceived support, sense of purpose, and progress toward goals at work as reflected in relationships, meaning, and achievement.
Low
Moderate
High
37Low811Moderate1215High
A score of 10 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting generally adequate relationships, meaning, and goal progress with some areas that may benefit from additional support or clarity.
example score
7/10
Internal Affective-Needs Well-Being (IANWB)
Measures the intensity of positive emotions and engagement an employee experiences in their work activities.
Low
Moderate
High
24Low57Moderate810High
A score of 7 indicates a moderate level of affective-need internal well-being, suggesting generally positive emotions and interest at work with some room to increase engagement.
example score
30/45
Overall Employee Subjective Well-Being Index (OESWBI)
Measures an employee’s overall subjective well-being at work, combining satisfaction, positive functioning, and workplace-related emotional experience.
Low well-being
Moderate well-being
High well-being
920Low well-being2133Moderate well-being3445High well-being
A score of 30 indicates moderate subjective well-being, suggesting generally stable functioning at work with some areas that may still benefit from support or improvement.
example score
3/5
Positive Emotions (PE)
Measures how often an employee experiences joy, pleasure, and other positive feelings in everyday work life.
Low
Moderate
High
01Low23Moderate45High
A score of 3 indicates a moderate level of positive emotions at work, suggesting a generally positive mood with room to strengthen day-to-day enjoyment.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

HR and People Ops
41%OF USERS
They use it to quickly gauge employee well-being, spot stress hotspots, and track the impact of new HR initiatives.
Team Leaders and Managers
34%OF USERS
They take it to understand morale and engagement in their teams and decide where support or workload changes are needed.
Employees in pulse checks
25%OF USERS
They complete it during workplace surveys to reflect how they feel at work and signal what helps or hurts their day-to-day experience.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Economic Security (ES)
Average
3.4
Normal range
2.93.9
min.
1
max.
5
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Physical Environment (PE)
Average
2.3
Normal range
1.62.9
min.
0
max.
5
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Growth Mindset (GM)
Average
2.9
Normal range
23.8
min.
0
max.
5
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Health (H)
Average
2.2
Normal range
1.33.1
min.
0
max.
5
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Achievement (A)
Average
1.6
Normal range
0.82.4
min.
0
max.
5
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
The importance of work (Tiow)
Average
3.3
Normal range
2.73.9
min.
0
max.
5
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Relationships (R)
Average
2.2
Normal range
1.43
min.
0
max.
5
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Engagement (E)
Average
3.4
Normal range
2.74
min.
0
max.
5
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Visually comparable (Vc)
Average
9.1
Normal range
6.711.4
min.
4
max.
20
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Social and needs-related internal (Sani)
Average
11.3
Normal range
9.613
min.
3
max.
15
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Affective-need internal (Ai)
Average
5.6
Normal range
4.17
min.
2
max.
10
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Composite Indicator of an Employee's Subjective Well-Being (CIoaESW)
Average
27.1
Normal range
22.531.7
min.
9
max.
45
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Positive emotions (Pe)
Average
3.4
Normal range
2.64.2
min.
0
max.
5
Majority
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
CLEAR ANSWERS TO COMMON QUESTIONS

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this well-being test measure?
This well-being test measures employee subjective well-being across nine domains based on the PERMA+4 model: positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning, accomplishment, physical health, economic stability, loneliness, and negative emotions. Each domain is scored independently, giving a detailed profile of what is supporting or undermining flourishing at work.
How long does it take and how many items are included?
Completion typically takes about 5–10 minutes. The questionnaire covers all nine PERMA+4 domains and each item should be rated based on typical experience at work rather than a single unusual day.
Who should take a well-being test like this one?
It is designed for employees who want to understand which aspects of their work life are supporting or draining their well-being. HR teams and occupational psychologists also use it to benchmark employee flourishing across teams, identify disengagement risk, and evaluate the effectiveness of workplace wellness initiatives.
How are the results of a well-being assessment interpreted?
Each domain score indicates how strongly that element of the PERMA model is present in a person's work experience. Low scores on specific domains — such as meaning or relationships — point to targeted areas for intervention. Results are subjective indicators of current flourishing, not a clinical diagnosis.
What is the difference between the PERMA model and the PERMA+4 model?
The original PERMA model by Seligman covers five domains of psychological well-being: positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishment. The PERMA+4 extension adds four workplace-relevant domains — physical health, economic stability, loneliness, and negative emotions — that research consistently identifies as significant drivers of employee flourishing and life satisfaction.
Can this well-being questionnaire be used to track change over time?
Yes. Repeated administration using the same instructions allows the instrument to detect meaningful shifts in subjective well-being across PERMA+4 domains. It is particularly useful for evaluating the impact of coaching, therapy, or organizational wellness programs when measured before and after an intervention.
Is this test suitable for organizational use?
Yes. Organizations use the PERMA+4 framework to measure employee well-being at scale, identify teams at risk of burnout or disengagement, and prioritize resource allocation for workplace wellness. Aggregated domain scores provide HR and leadership with actionable, evidence-based data for workforce planning.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Employee Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire, PERMA+4 Test

The well-being test is a multi-dimensional self-report instrument built on Seligman's PERMA model and extended with four additional domains — physical health, economic stability, loneliness, and negative emotions — to produce a comprehensive profile of how employees are flourishing at work. Each domain yields an independent score, revealing precisely where subjective well-being is strong and where it is being undermined by specific workplace or personal factors.

Why Take a Well-Being Test

Workplace wellness programs often rely on broad satisfaction scores that cannot identify which specific domain — meaning, engagement, relationships, or physical health — is driving distress or disengagement. A structured well-being assessment based on the PERMA model gives organizations and individuals actionable, domain-specific data rather than a single number that obscures the real picture.

A well-being questionnaire like this one is used by HR teams, occupational psychologists, and coaches to benchmark employee well-being, identify at-risk groups, and track the impact of workplace interventions over time. For individuals, results provide a clear starting point for understanding what is draining energy and what is already supporting flourishing in their work life.

What the Assessment Measures

  • Positive Emotions (P) — the frequency of positive emotions such as joy, gratitude, and contentment experienced in the work context, a core indicator of subjective well-being.
  • Engagement (E) — the degree of absorption and involvement in work tasks, including experiences of flow and intrinsic motivation.
  • Relationships (R) — the quality of social connections at work, including perceived support, trust, and belonging within teams.
  • Meaning (M) — the extent to which work is experienced as purposeful and aligned with personal values, a key driver of long-term psychological well-being.
  • Accomplishment (A) — perceived progress toward meaningful goals and a sense of achievement in one's professional role.
  • Physical Health, Economic Stability, Loneliness, Negative Emotions (+4) — four additional domains that extend the original PERMA model to capture material and physical factors known to significantly influence employee flourishing and life satisfaction.

Who This Assessment Is For

The well-being test is appropriate for employees, managers, and HR professionals who want a structured, evidence-based snapshot of how individuals or teams are thriving at work. Organizations use it to measure the impact of wellness initiatives, identify disengagement risk, and prioritize where to direct support resources. Coaches and occupational psychologists use the PERMA+4 well-being assessment during intake to map the specific domains driving burnout, low motivation, or reduced performance. The questionnaire is straightforward to complete — respondents simply rate how often they experience each described state — and requires no prior knowledge of positive psychology.

Clinical Validity and Use in Practice

The PERMA+4 framework extends Seligman's validated PERMA model with four empirically supported additional domains, producing a richer and more ecologically valid measure of employee well-being than single-dimension scales. Research using PERMA-based instruments consistently shows strong associations between domain scores and outcomes including job performance, absenteeism, burnout, and life satisfaction. Results should be interpreted as indicators of current subjective well-being and are most useful when reviewed alongside job role context, recent life events, and organizational data. Repeated administration using consistent instructions allows the instrument to track meaningful change over time, making it a practical tool for evaluating the effectiveness of workplace wellness programs.

Author: ed-diener, martin-e-p-seligman
Literature: Seligman, M. E. P. Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press. 2011.; Donaldson, S. I., & Donaldson, S. I. The positive functioning at work scale: Psychometric assessment, validation, and measurement invariance. Journal of Well-Being Assessment. 2021.; Donaldson, S. I., Donaldson, S. I., McQuaid, M., & Kern, M. L. The PERMA+4 short scale: A cross-cultural empirical validation using item response theory. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology. 2023.
Test Question Form
You Might Also Like
Subjective Well-Being Assessment
This measure is designed to support a structured appraisal of perceived lif…
Start Test
School Subjective Well-Being Questionnaire
This questionnaire is designed to assess students’ perceived well-being in…
Start Test
Subjective Well-Being Scale
This measure is used to obtain a brief self-report snapshot of current emot…
Start Test
Popular tests
Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI)
This self-report measure is used to assess narcissism as a personality trai…
Start Test
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS)
This measure is used to rapidly quantify the current severity of obsessive…
Start Test
CRAFFT Screening Test (CRAFFT 2.1)
This brief screening measure is designed to identify potential alcohol and…
Start Test
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
This measure is commonly used to quickly screen for the presence and severi…
Start Test
Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)
This self-report measure is used to assess occupational burnout symptoms in…
Start Test
Adolescent Anxiety Questionnaire
This measure is designed to support a brief appraisal of anxiety symptoms a…
Start Test
Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI)
This self-report measure assesses individual differences in the originality…
Start Test
Horne–Ostberg Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ)
Circadian preferences influence typical patterns of alertness and sleep tim…
Start Test
Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI)
This measure is designed to assess attitudes toward women, including both o…
Start Test
Internalized Misogyny Scale (IMS)
This measure is designed to assess internalized negative beliefs and stereo…
Start Test
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10)
This self-report measure assesses the degree to which individuals appraise…
Start Test
Impulsive Behavior Scale (SUPPS-P)
Impulsivity is a multidimensional construct that is often assessed with bri…
Start Test
Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol, Revised (CIWA-Ar)
This rating scale is used to rapidly assess the severity of alcohol withdra…
Start Test
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
This measure provides a brief self-report assessment of current or typical…
Start Test
Light Triad Scale (LTS)
This self-report measure assesses prosocial personality tendencies and orie…
Start Test
Suicidal Ideation Scale
In clinical settings, the Suicidal Ideation Scale is used to structure an i…
Start Test
Body Dysmorphic Disorder Scale (BDD-D)
This brief self-report measure is designed to screen for and quantify distr…
Start Test
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
This measure is a brief self-report inventory used to screen for anxiety sy…
Start Test
Differential Test of Perfectionism
This instrument is used to screen for perfectionism-related attitudes and t…
Start Test
Locus of Control Scale
This measure assesses generalized expectancies regarding the degree to whic…
Start Test
New Apathy Scale
This brief self-report measure is used to screen for apathy-related symptom…
Start Test
Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ)
This measure assesses individual differences in alexithymia, including diff…
Start Test
Social Intelligence Scale
This brief self-report measure is designed to support rapid screening of in…
Start Test
Fear Test
This measure is designed to evaluate individual differences in fear-related…
Start Test
Neuroticism Level Scale
The measure is intended for brief screening of an individual’s propensity t…
Start Test
Aggressiveness Indicators Screening Questionnaire
This screening tool is designed to quickly identify behavioral indicators a…
Start Test
Comments
Leave a Comment