Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
flexibility

Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) Test

Take the online Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
In just two minutes, the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) Test uses nine questions to explore how flexibly you respond to difficult thoughts and feelings. Your result can highlight tendencies toward acceptance or avoidance, offering a practical starting point for self-reflection and more intentional action.
Questions: 92 minutes
Acceptance and Action Questionnaire: test ticket with numbers
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
35,856 views
3,366 completions
2,854 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,854 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Acceptance and ActionAaA
Assesses psychological flexibility versus rigidity, indicating how much a person avoids or accepts internal experiences while continuing goal-directed action.
example score43/63
43/63Mixed flexibility/avoidanceexample score
9 – 26Higher flexibility
27 – 44Mixed flexibility/avoidance
45 – 63Higher rigidity/avoidance
A score of 43 falls in the mixed flexibility/avoidance range, suggesting a moderate tendency to resist or avoid difficult thoughts and feelings at times while still sometimes staying engaged in actions aligned with goals.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Anxiety and stress strugglers
41%OF USERS
People who feel overwhelmed by anxious thoughts or stress take it to see how much they avoid uncomfortable feelings and what might help them stay on track with goals.
Therapy and ACT clients
34%OF USERS
People already in therapy use it to track psychological flexibility over time and pinpoint where they get stuck in avoidance.
Self-improvement goal seekers
25%OF USERS
People working on habits, confidence, or performance take it to understand whether fear or discomfort is steering their choices more than their values.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Acceptance and Action ScaleAaAS
You?
Average48.8
Typical rangeTypical41.7 – 55.9
Possible9 – 63
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Never
    • Very rarely
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Almost always
    • Always
    • Never
    • Very rarely
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Almost always
    • Always
    • Never
    • Very rarely
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Almost always
    • Always
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) Test - Description and methodology of the test

flexibility
cbt
openness to experience
tpo

People who want to understand how they respond when anxiety, sadness, self-criticism, or uncertainty appears may find the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ) Test useful. It is intended for readers examining whether difficult inner experiences narrow their behavior or can be noticed while responsibilities and chosen actions continue. For self-reflection, this psychological flexibility test can provide a focused profile for more deliberate action.

What This Assessment Measures

These items explore action under uncertainty, responsibilities during anxiety or depression, attitudes toward feelings, recognition of negative judgments as reactions, and comparisons with other people's coping. Together, they examine whether difficult inner experiences narrow behavior or can be noticed without controlling every choice.

The main result themes are:

  • Action under uncertainty indicates whether doubt or distress interrupts responsibilities and chosen behavior.
  • Emotional openness indicates whether feelings are allowed without being treated as dangerous or requiring immediate control.
  • Perspective-taking indicates whether negative evaluations are seen as reactions rather than objective facts.

The questionnaire examines experiential avoidance as an experiential avoidance questionnaire using Acceptance and Action: 9-63. Higher scores indicate greater psychological inflexibility and avoidance of unpleasant internal experiences; lower scores indicate greater flexibility and capacity to accept them. Result bands are Higher flexibility 9-26, Mixed flexibility/avoidance 27-44, and Higher rigidity/avoidance 45-63.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each statement uses seven ordered response options, from Never to Always. Respondents rate how often each statement applies, covering action, anxiety, responsibility, feelings, self-evaluation, and coping. This format samples related situations rather than measuring one immediate mood.

The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (Hayes et al., 2004), an early measure of experiential avoidance within the psychological flexibility framework. The later AAQ-II study by Bond et al. (2011) examined a revised measure of the same broad construct. This online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with those measures, not an adaptation or identical version of either.

The displayed score offers an acceptance and action assessment: higher results reflect greater psychological inflexibility and avoidance, while lower results reflect greater flexibility and willingness to allow internal experiences.

The result is interpreted through the catalogue's displayed bands; no clinical cutoff or norm should be claimed unless it is documented for this exact questionnaire. Because responses depend on current stress, self-awareness, and response style, the result is best used as a structured prompt for reflection rather than a clinical conclusion.

Author: Kelly G. Wilson, Kirk D. Strosahl, Steven C. Hayes
Literature:
  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., Polusny, M. A., Dykstra, T. A., Batten, S. V., Bergan, J., Stewart, S. H., Zvolensky, M. J., Eifert, G. H., Bond, F. W., Forsyth, J. P., Karekla, M., & McCurry, S. M. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record, 54(4), 553-578. 10.1007/BF03395492
  • Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42(4), 676-688. 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment