Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
figurative thinking

Thought Flow Questionnaire Test

Take the online Thought Flow Questionnaire Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Thought Flow Questionnaire Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand how you think and visualize, including self-talk and stress shifts, in about 6 minutes. 29 quick items deliver a clear profile to guide therapy, coaching, or learning support.
Start Online Test
Questions: 296 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
32,346 views
2,980 completions
2,584 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
6/10
Stress-Related Intensification (SRI)
Measures how much a person’s inner dialogue with an imagined interlocutor tends to intensify under stress.
Low
Moderate
High
24: Low | 57: Moderate | 810: High
A score of 6 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not extreme tendency to engage an imagined inner interlocutor as stress increases.
example score
7/10
Self-Narration (SN)
Measures how often a person engages in internal self-narration or storytelling in their stream of thought.
Low
Moderate
High
24: Low | 57: Moderate | 810: High
A score of 7 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a fairly frequent habit of telling yourself stories without it being consistently dominant.
example score
5/10
Internal Imagery (II)
Measures how frequently and how vividly you experience internal visual images during contemplation.
Low imagery
Moderate imagery
High imagery
24: Low imagery | 57: Moderate imagery | 810: High imagery
A score of 5 suggests a moderate level of internal imagery, with visual images appearing sometimes and with average vividness.
example score
14/25
Uncontrolled Responses (UR)
Measures how often internal dialogue reactions arise automatically and feel hard to regulate.
More controllable
Mixed control
More uncontrollable
511: More controllable | 1218: Mixed control | 1925: More uncontrollable
A score of 14 falls in the Mixed control range, suggesting a moderate frequency of automatic internal responses that are sometimes manageable and sometimes spontaneous.
example score
9/15
Interlocutor (Significant Other) (IO)
Measures how often a person mentally addresses an imagined interlocutor who represents a significant person in their life.
Infrequent
Occasional
Frequent
37: Infrequent | 811: Occasional | 1215: Frequent
A score of 9 falls in the Occasional range, suggesting periodic inner addressing to a significant person without it being a dominant feature of thought flow.
example score
15/20
Internal Debates (ID)
Measures how often a person experiences internal disputes and self-directed discussions in their stream of thought.
Low
Moderate
High
49: Low | 1014: Moderate | 1520: High
A score of 15 falls in the High range, suggesting frequent inner debates and a strong tendency toward internal analysis and self-reflection.
example score
25/40
Conversational Partner (Non-Significant) (CPS)
Measures how often a person engages in inner dialogue with an imaginary, non-significant interlocutor (e.g., fictional characters).
Low
Moderate
High
818: Low | 1929: Moderate | 3040: High
A score of 25 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting occasional inner dialogues with fictional or non-significant imagined interlocutors.
example score
109/145
Overall Intensity of Thought Flow (OIoTF)
Measures how frequent and vivid a person experiences inner speech and spontaneous mental imagery overall.
Low
Moderate
High
2967: Low | 68106: Moderate | 107145: High
A score of 109 falls in the High range, suggesting a notably active thought stream with frequent and vivid inner speech and imagery.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Therapy and coaching clients
41%OF USERS
People in counseling or coaching who want to map their self-talk, mental imagery, and how these shift under stress to tailor strategies that fit their thinking style.
Researchers and clinicians
34%OF USERS
Psychology researchers and mental health professionals who need a quick measure of internal dialogue and visualization for studies, screening, or treatment planning.
Curious self-reflectors
25%OF USERS
Individuals interested in self-understanding who want to learn whether they think in words, stories, debates, or vivid images and how that affects focus and mood.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Intensification in Stress (IiS)
Intensification in Stress (IiS)
Average
6
Normal range
4.97.2
min.
2
max.
10
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Stories to Yourself (StY)
Stories to Yourself (StY)
Average
4.2
Normal range
3.25.2
min.
2
max.
10
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Internal images (Ii)
Internal images (Ii)
Average
4.9
Normal range
3.76.2
min.
2
max.
10
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Uncontrollable responses (Ur)
Uncontrollable responses (Ur)
Average
18.8
Normal range
15.622
min.
5
max.
25
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Significant Other (SO)
Significant Other (SO)
Average
9.2
Normal range
7.311
min.
3
max.
15
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Inner Conflicts (IC)
Inner Conflicts (IC)
Average
15.4
Normal range
13.217.6
min.
4
max.
20
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Interlocutor (insignificant) (I()
Interlocutor (insignificant) (I()
Average
28.9
Normal range
24.133.8
min.
8
max.
40
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Overall intensity of the thought flow (Oiottf)
Overall intensity of the thought flow (Oiottf)
Average
109.6
Normal range
91.8127.5
min.
29
max.
145
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Never
    • Very rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often
    • Never
    • Very rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often
    • Never
    • Very rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Stream of Consciousness Questionnaire Test

Thought Flow Questionnaire Test - Symptoms and Signs

figurative thinking
thinking style

This measure is designed to characterize how individuals organize their internal stream of thought, with attention to the form of inner speech and imagery. The Thought Flow Questionnaire samples common patterns of internal dialogue and monologue, including narrative self-talk and imagined interpersonal exchanges. It is a 29 items self-report instrument that typically takes about 6 minutes to complete.

Content focuses on qualitative features of internal communication and the vividness and frequency of mental imagery, including perceived changes under stress. The Thought Flow Questionnaire may be used to inform case formulation and to support research on cognitive style; it is not intended to serve as a standalone diagnostic tool. Originally attributed to Aaron T. Beck.

Author: Aaron T. Beck
Literature: Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology. 2015.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment