Autism Masking Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
Autism Masking Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who consciously monitor social behaviour, rehearse interactions, or hide discomfort may use this Autism Masking Test to reflect on how they adapt around others. The result can organise patterns that are easy to overlook in everyday life. As an autism masking assessment, it is most useful for people seeking clearer language for their experiences and a structured starting point for self-reflection.
What This Assessment Explores
The questions focus on camouflaging: changing visible behaviour, copying social signals, rehearsing responses, and learning social rules to appear at ease. They also address the effort behind these actions, including feeling that interaction is performed or discomfort must stay hidden. The resulting profile from this autism masking questionnaire shows which of these camouflaging patterns is most prominent.
The result is organised across four displayed scales:
- Masking (8-56) measures concealment of autistic traits; Lower masking: 8-34, Higher masking: 35-56.
- Compensation (9-63) measures active strategies for managing social difficulties; Lower compensation: 9-27, Higher compensation: 28-63.
- CAT-Q Total Score (25-175) reflects overall camouflaging; Low-moderate masking: 25-90, Elevated masking: 91-175; 100 or higher indicates a pronounced tendency.
- Assimilation (8-56) measures fitting in while concealing discomfort; Low: 8-29, High: 30-56.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each statement uses a seven-point agreement scale from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree. Respondents rate typical behaviour, and the answers are combined into the displayed subscales and total score; higher values represent more frequent or pronounced camouflaging strategies. The bands above provide the catalogue's labels for reading the profile; the total-score threshold marks elevated camouflaging within this result system.
The published CAT-Q is the relevant instrument for these item themes and scoring dimensions. Related qualitative work describes social camouflaging as managing outward presentation, learning social conventions, and adapting behaviour in social contexts. This online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that work, but its displayed scoring has not been established as a standardized or normed administration of the published CAT-Q.
Because it is a self-report profile rather than a diagnostic result, scores can be affected by current stress, memory, self-awareness, and the social settings a person has in mind. Read the pattern across scales alongside lived experience rather than treating one number as definitive; the profile of autistic masking strategies can help organise further self-reflection.
- Hull, Laura, William Mandy, Meng-Chuan Lai, Simon Baron-Cohen, Carrie Allison, Paula Smith, and K. V. Petrides. “Development and Validation of the Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire (CAT-Q).” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 49, no. 3 (2019): 819-833. 10.1007/s10803-018-3792-6
- Hull, Laura, K. V. Petrides, Carrie Allison, Paula Smith, Simon Baron-Cohen, Meng-Chuan Lai, and William Mandy. “Putting on My Best Normal”: Social Camouflaging in Adults with Autism Spectrum Conditions.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 47, no. 8 (2017): 2519-2534. 10.1007/s10803-017-3166-5
Updated: