Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Disagree
- Tend to agree
- Mostly agree
- Strongly agree
- Disagree
- Tend to agree
- Agree mostly
- Agree completely
- Disagree
- Agree slightly
- Agree mainly
- Agree completely
Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand why worry feels useful, threatening, or difficult to stop can use the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) Test as a structured self-report measure. This metacognitive beliefs assessment focuses on beliefs about thinking: worry’s usefulness or danger, thought control, monitoring, and cognitive confidence. The result shows how strongly these patterns are endorsed.
What This Assessment Explores
The MCQ-30 questionnaire examines beliefs about thinking and the meaning a person assigns to worry, attention, memory, and unwanted thoughts. The result profile contains five component scales and a Total Score:
- Cognitive Self-Consciousness (CSC), 6-24, shows thought monitoring: Lower monitoring 6-12; Moderate monitoring 13-18; Higher monitoring 19-24.
- Need to Control Thoughts, 6-24, measures control beliefs: Low 6-12; Moderate 13-18; High 19-24.
- Cognitive Confidence, 6-24, measures doubts about cognition: Low doubts 6-11; Moderate doubts 12-17; High doubts 18-24.
- Negative Beliefs (NEG), 6-24, measures danger and uncontrollability beliefs about worry: Low 6-11; Moderate 12-17; High 18-24.
- Positive Beliefs About Worry (POS), 6-24, measures beliefs that worry is useful: Low 6-11; Moderate 12-18; High 19-24.
- Total Score, 30-120, measures overall dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs: Lower 30-59; Moderate 60-89; Higher 90-120.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement presents a belief or experience for a four-point agreement response, from disagreement to strong agreement. The metacognition questionnaire covers thought monitoring, thought control, confidence in memory and attention, and beliefs that worry helps or creates danger. Responses capture personal appraisals, not objective cognitive performance.
Scoring produces five component results and a total profile. Higher values indicate stronger endorsement of the relevant belief pattern, while the total reflects dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs overall. The displayed bands are descriptive categories for lower, moderate, or higher levels.
This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with MCQ-30, but it is not presented as an adaptation or revalidation of the published instrument. The broader metacognitive framework is represented by work from Cartwright-Hatton and Wells, while Spada, Mohiyeddini, and Wells provide further evidence concerning MCQ-30 factor structure and predictive validity. The online questionnaire has no documented local normative standardization.
Current stress, self-awareness, recent experiences, and response style can influence answers, so the online profile is best read as a structured snapshot rather than a diagnosis or fixed trait.
- Wells, A., & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2004). A short form of the metacognitions questionnaire: Properties of the MCQ-30. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 42(4), 385-396. 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00147-5
- Cartwright-Hatton, S., & Wells, A. (1997). Beliefs about worry and intrusions: The Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire and its correlates. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11(3), 279-296. 10.1016/S0887-6185(97)00011-X
- Spada, M. M., Mohiyeddini, C., & Wells, A. (2008). Measuring metacognitions associated with emotional distress: Factor structure and predictive validity of the metacognitions questionnaire 30. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(3), 238-242. 10.1016/j.paid.2008.04.005
Updated: