Loyalty Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly agree
Loyalty Test - Description and methodology of the test
Employees and managers deciding whether a role still fits can use this loyalty test to examine the match between current work priorities, career aims, and commitment to one organization. The result helps frame questions about staying, contributing, and identifying with the employer, making an employee commitment assessment a practical starting point for reflection before a workplace decision.
What This Assessment Explores
The scales separate work values from organizational attachment, giving this workplace loyalty questionnaire a clear structure. Together, they show whether motivation centers on work, professional mastery, staying, participation, pride, or responsibility:
- Work Loyalty (15-75) shows work’s importance and willingness to take on extra effort: Low 15-38; Moderate 39-57; High 58-75.
- Professional Loyalty (15-75) measures development and career focus: Low 15-50; Moderate 51-63; High 64-75.
- Disloyal Behavior (5-25) contrasts readiness to leave with adherence to norms: Low commitment 5-13; Moderate commitment 14-18; High commitment 19-25.
- Organizational Involvement (5-25) measures participation and effort for success: Low engagement 5-14; Moderate engagement 15-19; High engagement 20-25.
- Pride in the Organization (5-25) reflects pride, reputation, and perceived superiority: Low pride 5-15; Moderate pride 16-20; High pride 21-25.
- Organizational Loyalty (15-75) summarizes attachment, responsibility, and contribution: Low 15-45; Moderate 46-57; High 58-75.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement uses a five-point agreement format, moving from strong disagreement to strong agreement, with a middle option for uncertainty. The items address work centrality, professional development, willingness to stay, participation, reputation, responsibility, and pride. Responses are combined into six displayed scale results, but the online version does not document item weighting or reverse-scoring; answer choices alone therefore cannot reconstruct a points formula.
Baranskaya’s Loyalty Measurement Method (2011) offers a conceptual comparison because it treats loyalty as multidimensional. Meyer and Allen’s three-component commitment model, along with the extension tested by Meyer, Allen, and Smith in 1993, offers a second conceptual comparison for the organizational themes. These works do not make the questionnaire an adaptation of their published instruments or validate its scores.
As a workplace loyalty assessment, the result is best read in context: working conditions, team identification, role fit, current pressures, honesty, and self-awareness can affect responses. The displayed low, moderate, and high bands are the questionnaire’s result categories for interpreting each score. The result cannot by itself establish a diagnosis or explain every employment decision.
- Baranskaya, S. S. (2011). Loyalty Measurement Method. Psychological Studies, 4(15). 10.54359/ps.v4i15.867
- Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89. 10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
- Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to Organizations and Occupations: Extension and Test of a Three-Component Conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551. 10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
Updated: