Interpersonal Sensitivity Measure (IPSM) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Completely true of me
- Partly true of me
- Somewhat/partly untrue of me
- Not at all true of me
- Very true
- Somewhat true
- Somewhat untrue
- Not at all true
- Completely true
- Partly true
- Somewhat/partly untrue
- Not at all true
Interpersonal Sensitivity Measure (IPSM) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People seeking a structured way to reflect on social experiences may find the Interpersonal Sensitivity Measure (IPSM) Test useful for personal reflection. This interpersonal sensitivity questionnaire examines sensitivity to others’ reactions and emotional involvement across interpersonal situations and relationships, rather than a single type of interaction. Its profile can clarify which aspects of interpersonal sensitivity stand out and provide a focused starting point for self-observation.
What This Assessment Explores
These statements focus on moments when another person’s opinion, feelings, or closeness carries weight. They address rejection, criticism, approval, separation, conflict, concern about hurting others, and lingering thoughts after disappointment. The IPSM questionnaire groups responses into a pattern of sensitivity to interpersonal situations, relationships, others’ reactions, and emotional involvement.
These four displayed dimensions organize the profile:
- Fear of Rejection (6-24) measures concern about judgment or non-acceptance and insecurity about disclosure: Low 6-11; Moderate 12-17; High 18-24.
- Dependence on Others' Evaluations (9-36) measures the importance of approval and fear of criticism: Low dependence 9-17; Moderate dependence 18-26; High dependence 27-36.
- Interpersonal Sensitivity Scale (22-88) measures susceptibility to others’ reactions and emotional involvement: Lower sensitivity 22-44; Moderate sensitivity 45-66; Higher sensitivity 67-88.
- Interpersonal Worry (7-28) measures anxiety about conflict, separation, or losing closeness: Low 7-13; Moderate 14-21; High 22-28.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item presents four ordered response options, moving from completely or very true through partly true or untrue to not at all true. The respondent selects the response option that best fits their experience; the submitted responses generate the displayed scale results.
Responses generate four displayed results. Their ranges and bands classify the profile, but the questionnaire does not specify each answer's point value. Because this interpersonal sensitivity assessment is self-report, current mood, recent conflict, memory, and openness can affect responses.
The closest published source is Interpersonal Sensitivity Measure (IPSM; Boyce & Parker, 1989). This is a separate online questionnaire; its wording, norms, reliability, and scoring cannot be transferred from the published IPSM. Harb et al. (2002) examined the IPSM in social anxiety disorder, and Boyce et al. (1993) studied its specificity in non-melancholic depression. Those findings provide context for the construct, not validation of this separate questionnaire.
Interpret the profile as interpersonal tendencies in the situations covered by the items, including reactions to judgment, approval, separation, and conflict. The displayed bands are descriptive categories for this questionnaire, not established clinical thresholds.
- Boyce, P., & Parker, G. (1989). Development of a scale to measure interpersonal sensitivity. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 23(3), 341-351. 10.1177/000486748902300320
- Harb, G. C., Heimberg, R. G., Fresco, D. M., Schneier, F. R., & Liebowitz, M. R. (2002). The psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Sensitivity Measure in social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(8), 961-979. 10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00125-5
- Boyce, P., Hickie, I., Parker, G., Mitchell, P., Wilhelm, K., & Brodaty, H. (1993). Specificity of interpersonal sensitivity to non-melancholic depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 27(2), 101-105. 10.1016/0165-0327(93)90082-U
Updated: