Social Anxiety Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- No
- Probably not
- Probably yes
- Yes
- No
- Probably no
- Probably yes
- Yes
- No
- Probably not
- Probably yes
- Yes
Social Anxiety Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who feel tense under observation, avoid unfamiliar interactions, or replay conversations may use this social anxiety disorder test to organize those experiences. As a social anxiety test, it helps the respondent examine whether attention, criticism, and social initiative are recurring sources of distress. The result offers a focused starting point for deciding which situations deserve closer self-reflection.
What This Assessment Measures
Items cover observation, evaluation, unfamiliar people, initiative, public speaking, disagreement, and post-event review. As a social anxiety quiz, the result separates avoidance, nervousness, concealment, and rumination.
The displayed dimensions are:
- Expert Situations: Avoidance of Direct Contact (0-18) measures avoidance in evaluative contact; Low 0-3, Moderate 4-9, High 10-18.
- Scale 4 (0-18) measures anxiety about initiative with unfamiliar people; Low 0-6, Moderate 7-10, High 11-18.
- Scale 3 (0-15) measures suppressed emotional expression and hidden nervousness; Low 0-5, Moderate 6-9, High 10-15.
- Scale 2 (0-15) measures rumination and the wish to control evaluative anxiety; Low 0-5, Moderate 6-9, High 10-15.
- Scale 1 (0-21) measures anxiety under observation or attention; Low 0-5, Moderate 6-15, High 16-21.
- Social Anxiety and Social Phobia (0-89) measures general social anxiety and avoidance; Low 0-29, Moderate 30-49, High 50-89.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item uses four ordered responses, from No to Yes, with intermediate choices such as Probably not and Probably yes. Answers are combined into the displayed dimensions and overall index; the result gives ranges and bands, but the response labels do not justify inventing a separate point-by-point weighting.
The closest published basis is OSTSPh (Sagalakova & Truevtsev, 2012), whose themes match avoidance, fear of evaluation, inhibited expression, and rumination. The questionnaire is also conceptually consistent with Clark and Wells’s (1995) cognitive model of social phobia. Grigorieva and Enikolopov (2016) provide relevant evidence on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale and Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale, but that work does not validate this online form.
The result connects reported social anxiety symptoms with the situations that trigger them. Self-report can shift with current stress, self-awareness, and willingness to disclose. The displayed bands organize interpretation, but this questionnaire does not provide population norms or diagnostic thresholds; persistent, impairing difficulties call for broader clinical assessment.
- Sagalakova, O. A., & Truevtsev, D. V. (2012). Questionnaire of Social Anxiety and Sociophobia. Medical Psychology in Russia, 4(15), Article 19.
- Grigorieva, I. V., & Enikolopov, S. N. (2016). Testing Questionnaires “Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale” and “Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale” (Short Version). National Psychological Journal, 1(21), 31-44. 10.11621/npj.2016.0105.
- Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A Cognitive Model of Social Phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social Phobia: Diagnosis, Assessment, and Treatment (pp. 69-93). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Updated: