Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
close relationships

Romantic Relationship Motivation Types Questionnaire (CMQ) Test

Take the online Romantic Relationship Motivation Types Questionnaire (CMQ) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Romantic Relationship Motivation Types Questionnaire (CMQ) Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand what truly motivates each partner and how it shapes the relationship in just 4 minutes. This 21 item tool supports counseling and research by revealing strengths and pressure points to guide healthier change.
Start Online Test
Questions: 214 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
18,695 views
2,043 completions
1,733 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
4/7
Integrated Regulation (IR)
Measures how strongly relationship behaviors are guided by motives that have been fully internalized and aligned with personal values.
Low integration
Moderate integration
High integration
13.1: Low integration | 3.24.5: Moderate integration | 4.67: High integration
A score of 4 indicates moderate integrated regulation, suggesting your relationship actions are somewhat aligned with your core values but may still be influenced by external reasons at times.
example score
4/7
Identified (I)
Measures the extent to which relationship actions are guided by personally endorsed values and meaning rather than external pressure.
Low identified
Moderate identified
High identified
12.3: Low identified | 2.44.3: Moderate identified | 4.47: High identified
A score of 4 indicates moderate identified regulation, suggesting your relationship efforts are somewhat value-driven, though not consistently grounded in personally endorsed meaning.
example score
4/7
Introjected Regulation (IR)
Measures the extent to which relationship behaviors are driven by internalized obligations, guilt, or the need to maintain self-worth rather than freely chosen motives.
Low introjection
Moderate introjection
High introjection
11.8: Low introjection | 1.93.9: Moderate introjection | 47: High introjection
A score of 4 suggests higher introjected regulation, meaning actions in the relationship are more often influenced by “shoulds,” guilt, or self-respect concerns.
example score
5/7
External Regulation (ER)
Measures how much relationship behavior is driven by external demands, rewards, or fear of negative consequences rather than personal choice.
Low external control
Moderate external control
High external control
11.6: Low external control | 1.73.4: Moderate external control | 3.57: High external control
A score of 5 indicates a high level of external regulation, suggesting relationship actions are often influenced by outside expectations, rewards, or pressure.
example score
4/7
Amotivation (A)
Amotivation reflects how much a person lacks clear, self-directed reasons for their behavior in the relationship.
Low
Elevated
12.71: Low | 2.727: Elevated
A score of 4 falls in the Elevated range, suggesting you may sometimes act in the relationship without feeling clear internal reasons or direction for your actions.
example score
3/7
Intrinsic Motivation (IM)
Intrinsic Motivation measures the extent to which a person engages in the relationship for inherent enjoyment, interest, and personal satisfaction.
Low
Moderate
High
12.8: Low | 2.94.4: Moderate | 4.57: High
A score of 3 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting intrinsic enjoyment is present but not a primary driver of relationship involvement.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Couples in a rough patch
41%OF USERS
Partners who feel stuck or disconnected take it to understand what each person is really motivated by and what is driving tension.
Therapists and counselors
34%OF USERS
Professionals use it as a quick check-in to clarify whether a partner’s efforts come from genuine desire, growth, obligation, or external pressure.
Self-growth partners
25%OF USERS
Couples who want to strengthen a generally good relationship take it to spot what fuels commitment and what could become a hidden risk over time.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Integrated (I)
Integrated (I)
Average
4.7
Normal range
3.85.6
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Identified (I)
Identified (I)
Average
4.5
Normal range
3.75.3
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Introjected (I)
Introjected (I)
Average
3.4
Normal range
2.54.3
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
External (E)
External (E)
Average
4
Normal range
3.14.9
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Amotivation (A)
Amotivation (A)
Average
3.7
Normal range
2.64.8
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Intrinsic Motivation (IM)
Intrinsic Motivation (IM)
Average
3.9
Normal range
3.14.8
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

You are presented with one question and a set of response statements. Your task is to rate the extent to which, in your opinion, each statement reflects reality and to select the corresponding response option. The question is: Why are you currently in a relationship with a partner?
    • Does not apply to reality at all
    • Does not apply to reality
    • Rather does not apply to reality
    • Neither applies nor does not apply
    • Rather applies to reality
    • Applies to reality
    • Completely applies to reality
    • Not true at all
    • Not true
    • Rather not true
    • Neither true nor untrue
    • Rather true
    • True
    • Completely true
    • Completely untrue
    • Untrue
    • Somewhat untrue
    • Neither true nor untrue
    • Somewhat true
    • True
    • Completely true
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Questionnaire on Types of Motivation in Romantic Relationships, CMQ Test

Romantic Relationship Motivation Types Questionnaire (CMQ) Test - Symptoms and Signs

close relationships
self-determination

In clinical and research contexts, understanding what drives partners’ choices can clarify patterns of engagement and strain. The Romantic Relationship Motivation Types Questionnaire (CMQ) is a brief self-report measure designed to characterize reasons for behavior within a romantic relationship.

It consists of 21 items and typically requires about 4 minutes to complete. Respondents rate how well different reasons describe their relationship-related actions, supporting a structured discussion of motivational influences on relationship functioning.

Results from the Romantic Relationship Motivation Types Questionnaire (CMQ) may be used to inform case conceptualization, guide intervention planning, or support research examining links between motivational patterns and relationship outcomes. Interpretation should be integrated with clinical interview data and other relevant measures.

Author: Edward L. Deci, Richard M. Ryan
Literature: Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry. 2000.; Blais, M. R., Sabourin, S., Boucher, C., & Vallerand, R. J. Toward a motivational model of couple happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment